Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

PreviousDocument #1496Next

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030406.txt

Why This Matters

The email discusses an interview with Steve Bannon on Nieuwsuur.

AI-Generated Summary

The email discusses an interview with Steve Bannon on Nieuwsuur. The key topic of the conversation is whether Donald Trump actively promoted the theory that Barack Obama was not born in the US and therefore not a legitimate President. The sender agrees with the recipient's opinion that Bannon should not defend this stance, and they plan to pass on this message. Additionally, there is mention of the interview being "fun" and a reminder about the confidentiality of the communication.

Document Content

File Type: TXT

View File

Related Documents

EFTA00032998-p-5.jpg

The image shows a postcard that appears to be used for voting purposes. The postcard is addressed to "J. Epstein" and includes handwritten notes on the front side. There's also a stamp visible in the upper right corner with the words "Election Mail." The text on the postcard, partially obscured by handwriting, mentions "Important Election Reminders" and provides dates of "Nov 3, 2020" and "Dec 8, 2020." Additionally, there's a red stamp indicating that the postcard is to be sent "Return Service Requested." The handwriting includes some initials next to the name "J. Epstein" on the front of the postcard, possibly indicating the sender or recipient's confirmation.

Election MailImportant Election RemindersReturn Service Requested+19 more

EFTA00025010-p-3.jpg

The image shows a page from an official document that appears to be a form of certification. It includes various fields filled out with handwritten text and signatures. The visible portions of the text describe a person's qualifications or achievements, mentioning "Age 65" and "Certified Specialist in Business Communication." There are sections titled "Professional Development," "Additional Information for Certification," and "Signatures." The document also contains some kind of certification number or ID at the top right corner. The overall style is formal, typical of official documents used for professional accreditation.

Certified SpecialistofficialAge 65+7 more

EFTA00020517-p-2.jpg

The image is a scanned document with numerous redacted sections, which means parts of the text have been deliberately obscured for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks are typically used to conceal sensitive information like names, addresses, and personal details from public view. As the content of the redacted areas has been intentionally hidden, it's not possible to provide specifics about the visible text or any people, locations, or significant objects within those sections. The document appears to be official in nature, possibly a legal or governmental record, given the formality and structure of the layout.

formrecordid+13 more

EFTA00009116-p-095.jpg

The image displays a page with written content on it. There are several lines of text organized into questions and answers, suggesting that the document might be part of an interview or survey record. The questions and answers appear to be related to communication skills or personal opinions as evidenced by phrases like "communication is not about talking" in one answer. On the top right corner, there is a black mark through a line, possibly indicating deletion or correction. Additionally, there are numbers next to some of the text, which could indicate page numbers or question numbers. The document has a lined paper appearance and has been printed or handwritten with dark ink on lighter paper.

Additionallyrecordid+2 more

EFTA00009116-p-091.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with printed text that has been heavily redacted, where large parts are obscured by black ink to prevent their reading. There is a date in the top left corner: "SEP 16 '92". The visible portions suggest it could be related to some sort of official document or report, as indicated by words such as "questions" and "answer", but without further context, the exact nature of the document remains unclear. The image itself appears to have been taken with a smartphone or camera, given the quality and angle of the shot.

reportofficialevent+3 more