HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031118.txt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031118.txt
Why This Matters
The document discusses an Oscar diary written by Peggy Siegalli, which describes her experiences attending the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences' ticket pick-up for the 85th Oscar telecast.
AI-Generated Summary
The document discusses an Oscar diary written by Peggy Siegalli, which describes her experiences attending the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences' ticket pick-up for the 85th Oscar telecast. She mentions notable people such as Norman Jewison, Steven Spielberg, Tom Cruise, Paula Wagner, Jessica Chastain, and Harvey Weinstein. The document also references a party hosted by Jeffrey Katzenberg and discusses various topics related to Hollywood, including film awards and actors' chances of winning Oscars.
Document Content
File Type: TXT
View FileRelated Documents
EFTA00009116-p-078.jpg
The image is a grayscale photocopy of a document with handwritten notes and annotations. The document appears to be an official letter or report, possibly related to legal proceedings given the context of phrases like "Motion for Extension of Time" and references to case numbers and filings. The text includes numbered paragraphs (1-26) and is dense with information, discussing various points that seem to pertain to a specific court proceeding. There's a handwritten note in one section pointing out something as "Interesting." The bottom part of the document has additional notes written across it. The writing is legible but not entirely clear due to the angle and quality of the photocopy. The style of the image suggests it is meant for informational or historical purposes, capturing a moment in time related to legal proceedings or documentation.
EFTA00009116-p-053.jpg
The image shows a page from what appears to be an official document or report, possibly related to legal proceedings given the context provided by some of the texts. The page is numbered "Page 25" at the top right corner. The text on the page includes bullet points with questions and answers that seem to be part of a formal interview or deposition session. The visible text includes phrases such as "What time did you leave for the airport?," "How long have you known so-and-so?," "What happened when you arrived at the restaurant?," and so on. The questions are followed by answers which are not fully visible in the image provided. There is also a note or comment at the bottom of the page that says "What's the big deal here? I don't see anything in the record about what happened to make you so upset." This statement suggests a line of questioning focused on understanding the emotional state of an individual involved in the proceedings. The image is a photograph or scan, and its quality is not high, with some text being obscured by shadows and distortions typical of photocopies or scans that are not optimally lit or aligned for clarity.
EFTA00009116-p-017.jpg
The image shows a sheet of paper with handwritten notes and questions. At the top, there is text that reads "PAGE 1," suggesting this is the first page of information. The note contains various bullet points and question numbers like "Q32" and "Q33," indicating they are part of a series or a list. There's also a mention of "criteria" and "what I said," which implies that these notes pertain to specific responses or statements. Additionally, there is a line at the bottom with the word "Feeling," followed by a question mark, indicating an emotional response or a reflection on feelings associated with the content of the questions.
EFTA00008998-p-18.jpg
The image shows a legal document with text. The text at the top of the page reads "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION" followed by "IN THE MATTER OF: JOEL R. KEISLING'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY." There are various numbered paragraphs and headings, indicating that this is a structured legal filing. The document appears to be in black ink on white paper with visible page numbers.
EFTA00008920-p-36.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with a list of questions and answers handwritten on it. The writing appears to be related to an interview or discussion about someone's experiences or opinions, given the context provided by the visible text. Specific details about the questions and answers are not clear due to the angle and focus of the photograph. There is a mention of a specific date in March, but the full year is not visible. The paper has some lines crossed out with a pen, which could indicate corrections or edits made during the process of transcribing the information.