Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

PreviousDocument #2510Next

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032974.txt

Why This Matters

This document discusses a publication of an article about stocks in the New York Times.

AI-Generated Summary

This document discusses a publication of an article about stocks in the New York Times. The conversation includes people such as Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey E., who work at JEE. It mentions that the article has been published on the NYT website and encourages sharing it on social platforms. The email is marked confidential and may contain attorney-client privileged information.

Document Content

File Type: TXT

View File

Related Documents

EFTA00020517-p-2.jpg

The image is a scanned document with numerous redacted sections, which means parts of the text have been deliberately obscured for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks are typically used to conceal sensitive information like names, addresses, and personal details from public view. As the content of the redacted areas has been intentionally hidden, it's not possible to provide specifics about the visible text or any people, locations, or significant objects within those sections. The document appears to be official in nature, possibly a legal or governmental record, given the formality and structure of the layout.

formrecordid+13 more

EFTA00009116-p-075.jpg

The image is a scanned document with printed text on it. The content of the text includes a list and some questions. At the top of the document, there's a handwritten note that says "Thank you for coming to my house!" There's also a number 14 listed in the upper right corner, possibly indicating a page number or item number from a larger list. The document appears to be discussing topics related to planning and development, as indicated by phrases such as "planning area" and "long-term plan." The writing is somewhat difficult to read due to the handwriting and quality of the scan.

Thanknotelist+3 more

EFTA00009116-p-072.jpg

The image shows a page of handwritten notes with numbered points. The first point is about the lack of support for an issue and mentions that it has been raised before. The second point discusses how a conversation is necessary to resolve the situation because it affects many people. There's a reference to a "Friday 26th" meeting in which it was decided that the person writing these notes will be responsible for handling the matter, as well as an indication that they learned about this responsibility at that meeting. The third point discusses how there has been no progress or action despite promises made at previous meetings. The fourth point mentions that this is a critical issue and must be addressed immediately. There's also mention of "The New Beach Policy" which may be the subject matter of these notes. The final point states that the person writing the notes will discuss this with someone on Monday, and there are instructions to contact them immediately if they don't receive an update by that time.

The New Beach PolicyFridayNew+9 more

EFTA00009116-p-046.jpg

The image is a black and white photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten text. The page appears to be a list of questions or prompts, possibly for an interview or survey, as indicated by phrases like "Why did Phil do it?" and "What made you take off your shirt?" There are also some personal anecdotes described such as meeting someone in New York City at the World's Fair. The paper is partially cut off on the right side, so not all of the text is visible.

New York CityPhilNew+10 more

EFTA00009116-p-003.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with printed text. The print is too small and blurry to read the content clearly, but it appears to be organized into paragraphs and numbered sections or points. There are some lines crossed out in red marker, indicating that certain parts have been removed or edited. On the top right corner, there's a date "14 FEB 85" written in black ink, suggesting that this document is dated February 14th from a year indicated by the "85," although the specific year cannot be determined due to the small text size and resolution of the image. The overall style of the image suggests it's a photograph or scan of a physical document with visible handwritten annotations.

Februaryhandwritten14 FEB 85+11 more