Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

PreviousDocument #6226Next

DOJ-OGR-00025545.jpg

Why This Matters

The image displays a document titled "Scientific Program Update" with a date of December 2019.

AI-Generated Summary

The image displays a document titled "Scientific Program Update" with a date of December 2019. The document is marked as "Confidential" and contains redacted sections where personal names and possibly contact information were originally present. There's also an indicator that the original email was sent on December 2, 2019, from someone in the department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at a university medical center. The document is likely related to administrative matters within a scientific research or conference setting.

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00025545.jpg

Related Documents

EFTA00025010-p-4.jpg

The image is of a document with various sections and fields filled out, possibly an application form or official paperwork. It contains some text, numbers, dates, and checkboxes. There are also blank areas where additional information would be written. The layout includes headers, subheadings, and lines for the applicant to fill in their details. At the bottom right corner of the document, there's a watermark that reads "CONFIDENTIAL," indicating the sensitivity or classification level of the content. The photo itself is taken at an angle, with part of the document's top left corner visible and the rest following the curvature of the paper.

applicationformid+3 more

EFTA00020517-p-1.jpg

The image shows a document from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The upper part of the document is obscured by a black rectangle with white text that reads "INVESTIGATION" followed by a date in December 2014. Below this, there's an address line indicating the location of the investigation. The rest of the content on the document is redacted with black lines to obscure information. The top right corner has a small section labeled 'Date:' which also appears to be redacted. There are no visible people in the image, and the focus is solely on the text within the FBI document.

Federal BureauFederalBureau+5 more

EFTA00009116-p-083.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned copy of a document, which seems to be a list of points related to an investigation. The first point visible is "And they are saying that there was no reason to believe that this thing happened at the time it did". The text is typed in black ink on white paper, with some parts blurred out, likely for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document has a formal layout, suggesting it may be of legal or professional nature. The image quality is not very high, making some parts difficult to read clearly.

formlistid+4 more

EFTA00009116-p-062.jpg

The image shows a black and white document that appears to be an interview schedule or script for a news segment or discussion panel. At the top of the page, there are redacted names where the person's name is replaced with "MR" or "MRS," followed by what seems to be their last name, indicating male or female speakers. The text contains topics and questions for each speaker, including issues related to public opinion on political matters, potential for compromise in discussion, and personal reactions. There are numbers next to the names, which might refer to the order of appearance or some other categorization. The document also has redacted phone numbers, indicating a need for confidentiality around these details.

orderscheduleid+5 more

EFTA00009116-p-043.jpg

The image is a black and white photograph of a handwritten note on lined paper. The writing is slightly difficult to decipher due to the angle at which the photo was taken. The text includes phrases such as "the state," "December 2017," and "it's always something." There are several lines crossed out with what appears to be red ink, indicating corrections or deletions. At the bottom of the page, there is a signature, but it is not clear who signed the document. The quality of the image suggests that it may have been taken quickly or without proper lighting, resulting in the text being somewhat blurry and obscured.

Decembernotehandwritten+5 more