DOJ-OGR-00026639.jpg
DOJ-OGR-00026639.jpg
Why This Matters
The image appears to be a screenshot of a computer application with an open document.
AI-Generated Summary
The image appears to be a screenshot of a computer application with an open document. The document is titled "Request for Correction" and includes various fields such as "Correction Type," "Corrected Information," and "Date/Time of Error." There's also text that seems to be indicating the recipient or addressee of the correction request, though it's not fully visible in the image provided. The layout suggests a form designed for data entry and tracking.
Document Preview
Related Documents
EFTA00009116-p-078.jpg
The image is a grayscale photocopy of a document with handwritten notes and annotations. The document appears to be an official letter or report, possibly related to legal proceedings given the context of phrases like "Motion for Extension of Time" and references to case numbers and filings. The text includes numbered paragraphs (1-26) and is dense with information, discussing various points that seem to pertain to a specific court proceeding. There's a handwritten note in one section pointing out something as "Interesting." The bottom part of the document has additional notes written across it. The writing is legible but not entirely clear due to the angle and quality of the photocopy. The style of the image suggests it is meant for informational or historical purposes, capturing a moment in time related to legal proceedings or documentation.
EFTA00008920-p-65.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with visible handwriting and typed text on it. At the top of the page, there's a section labeled "Date" followed by numbers "01/25/97," indicating that the date is January 25, 1997. The handwriting seems to be in black ink and includes words like "Yes," "No," "Yes," and "No," suggesting a pattern of questioning or answering. There's also typed text with lines drawn through some portions of it, which makes it difficult to read the full content. Additionally, there are various numbers such as "20," "15," "10," and "8," but without more context, their significance is unclear. The page has a yellowish hue, typical for aged paper or photocopied documents.
EFTA00008920-p-45.jpg
The image shows a document with redacted information across its entirety. The redactions are made using black lines to obscure text and images within the document. There is no visible text that is not obscured by these lines, rendering it impossible to discern any specific content from this image.
EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.
EFTA00008892-p-22.jpg
The image appears to be a digital capture of an official document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the context. The main focus is on a section that includes handwritten annotations in red ink. These annotations are primarily corrections and notes, likely made by someone reviewing the document. The text is partially visible and seems to include phrases such as "Deposition Date" and "Redacted for Privacy." There's also a reference to "Court Order No. 15-CV-2467" indicating that this document might be related to case number 15-CV-2467 in court proceedings. The style of the image suggests it has been scanned or photographed and shared through an electronic medium, given the slight blurriness and shadows around the edges, which are common with digital captures rather than printed documents.