Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

PreviousDocument #817Next

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt

Why This Matters

The document is a forward of an email containing fact checking questions for a New York Magazine story.

AI-Generated Summary

The document is a forward of an email containing fact checking questions for a New York Magazine story. The main person mentioned in the questions is Michael Wolff and his experiences with Jeffery E. Yablon. Key topics include the square footage of their Manhattan home, working habits, paparazzi presence, tech entrepreneurs, wealth levels, challenges of philanthropy, future of super-rich fortunes, inheritance, advising on charitable initiatives, and an investment in New York Magazine.

Document Content

File Type: TXT

View File

Related Documents

EFTA00020517-p-2.jpg

The image is a scanned document with numerous redacted sections, which means parts of the text have been deliberately obscured for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks are typically used to conceal sensitive information like names, addresses, and personal details from public view. As the content of the redacted areas has been intentionally hidden, it's not possible to provide specifics about the visible text or any people, locations, or significant objects within those sections. The document appears to be official in nature, possibly a legal or governmental record, given the formality and structure of the layout.

formrecordid+13 more

EFTA00009116-p-072.jpg

The image shows a page of handwritten notes with numbered points. The first point is about the lack of support for an issue and mentions that it has been raised before. The second point discusses how a conversation is necessary to resolve the situation because it affects many people. There's a reference to a "Friday 26th" meeting in which it was decided that the person writing these notes will be responsible for handling the matter, as well as an indication that they learned about this responsibility at that meeting. The third point discusses how there has been no progress or action despite promises made at previous meetings. The fourth point mentions that this is a critical issue and must be addressed immediately. There's also mention of "The New Beach Policy" which may be the subject matter of these notes. The final point states that the person writing the notes will discuss this with someone on Monday, and there are instructions to contact them immediately if they don't receive an update by that time.

The New Beach PolicyFridayNew+9 more

EFTA00009116-p-046.jpg

The image is a black and white photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten text. The page appears to be a list of questions or prompts, possibly for an interview or survey, as indicated by phrases like "Why did Phil do it?" and "What made you take off your shirt?" There are also some personal anecdotes described such as meeting someone in New York City at the World's Fair. The paper is partially cut off on the right side, so not all of the text is visible.

New York CityPhilNew+10 more

EFTA00008998-p-16.jpg

The image displays a document with printed text on it, which appears to be a news article related to court proceedings involving the State of New York. The document is black and white, and there are two columns of text visible in the captured portion. The style of the text suggests an official or formal publication, possibly from a legal or governmental source. There's no image of people, locations, or significant objects other than the printed document itself.

New YorkStateNew+7 more

EFTA00008998-p-12.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten annotations on the side. The document appears to be a formal letter or report, as indicated by the layout and the presence of headings and subheadings. There are visible texts such as "INTRODUCTION", "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL", "STATES PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL INHUMANE OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT", and a reference to New York as a location. The annotations suggest that the document has been reviewed or used for discussion in a meeting or legal context. There are no people visible in the image.

New YorkNewYork+8 more