HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011170.txt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011170.txt
Why This Matters
The document provides statistics related to Brexit sentiment from Twitter on June 23rd, 2016.
AI-Generated Summary
The document provides statistics related to Brexit sentiment from Twitter on June 23rd, 2016. A total of 302,113 tweets were collected between 12 AM CEST and 11 PM CEST that day. Of these tweets: * 157,075 tweets had a positive sentiment. * 93,305 tweets had a negative sentiment. * 51,750 tweets had a neutral sentiment. The document also includes examples of specific tweets with various sentiments and locations.
Document Content
File Type: TXT
View FileRelated Documents
EFTA00009116-p-046.jpg
The image is a black and white photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten text. The page appears to be a list of questions or prompts, possibly for an interview or survey, as indicated by phrases like "Why did Phil do it?" and "What made you take off your shirt?" There are also some personal anecdotes described such as meeting someone in New York City at the World's Fair. The paper is partially cut off on the right side, so not all of the text is visible.
EFTA00009116-p-038.jpg
The image is a photograph of a handwritten document with the heading "For that the U.S. Justice Department believes that India was involved in the assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi" followed by a list numbered from 1 to 26, with text underneath each number. The text under each point is too small and blurry to read clearly. There are also some visible texts at the top right corner of the page, but they're not entirely legible due to the angle of the photo and the quality of the image.
EFTA00009116-p-013.jpg
The image appears to be a black and white photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten notes. The writing is somewhat difficult to read due to the angle and the quality of the photo. There are several lines of text, some of which seem to be crossed out or obscured. The visible content includes words like "Day", "Club", and what appears to be a question mark followed by a series of phrases that may represent questions or statements. There's also a mention of "language" towards the end of the visible text. The paper has several numbered lines, suggesting it might have been used for an interview or some kind of structured discussion.
EFTA00009016-p-096.jpg
The image displays a black and white document with printed text on lined paper. The text appears to be from a legal proceeding or testimony given under oath, as indicated by the phrase "Under Oath" near the top of the page. Below that heading are numbered paragraphs containing questions and answers. One question reads: "Q Did you ever have any discussions with Mr. Philips about whether it is really appropriate for someone in his position to be attending meetings at the home of a lobbyist? A No, not really." The document also contains handwritten annotations in blue ink. These annotations include underlining certain words and phrases, making corrections or additions, and crossing out some text. There's a checkmark next to one of the handwritten changes, which might indicate approval or agreement with the amendment. The quality of the image is not high-resolution, making it difficult to read all the fine details.
EFTA00009016-p-049.jpg
The image displays a handwritten list of questions on lined notebook paper with visible creases and scrawls that suggest it has been handled extensively. The text is difficult to decipher due to its informal writing style and the quality of the handwriting, but the phrases "What's their name?" and "No longer available" are discernible, suggesting inquiries about a person or status. The paper appears to be aged, possibly indicating it was used for note-taking or interview questions at some point in time.