Documents tagged "No"
Found 437 documents with this tag
EFTA00009016-p-096.jpg
The image displays a black and white document with printed text on lined paper. The text appears to be from a legal proceeding or testimony given under oath, as indicated by the phrase "Under Oath" near the top of the page. Below that heading are numbered paragraphs containing questions and answers. One question reads: "Q Did you ever have any discussions with Mr. Philips about whether it is really appropriate for someone in his position to be attending meetings at the home of a lobbyist? A No, not really." The document also contains handwritten annotations in blue ink. These annotations include underlining certain words and phrases, making corrections or additions, and crossing out some text. There's a checkmark next to one of the handwritten changes, which might indicate approval or agreement with the amendment. The quality of the image is not high-resolution, making it difficult to read all the fine details.
EFTA00009016-p-049.jpg
The image displays a handwritten list of questions on lined notebook paper with visible creases and scrawls that suggest it has been handled extensively. The text is difficult to decipher due to its informal writing style and the quality of the handwriting, but the phrases "What's their name?" and "No longer available" are discernible, suggesting inquiries about a person or status. The paper appears to be aged, possibly indicating it was used for note-taking or interview questions at some point in time.
EFTA00009016-p-047.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper with the title "Page 26" at the top. The writing appears to be an interview transcript, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: How long have you lived here? A: Since I was born." and questions related to work experience, personal experiences, and other life-related topics. The handwriting is neat, with some words crossed out or altered. There are no visible texts apart from the interview transcript and page number. No people, locations, or significant objects other than the text are discernible in this image.
EFTA00009016-p-043.jpg
The image displays a handwritten page with text that appears to be a list of questions and answers related to a specific topic. The writing is in black ink on what looks like a piece of notebook paper. There are various lines with question numbers followed by the word "Yes" or "No," indicating responses to inquiries. The questions seem to be part of an interview or survey format, though the exact context or content of the questions is not clear from the image alone.
EFTA00009016-p-037.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with handwritten notes and text. The paper is numbered "25" at the top left corner, suggesting it's part of a series or set. The text on the page is too small and blurry to read clearly, but from what can be seen, there are various lines of writing which seem to include phrases like "I think" and "No matter how much," indicating that the content might be related to someone's thoughts or opinions about a particular topic. The document has notches at the top right corner, possibly for easy page-turning or organization purposes. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects other than what is described.
11_12_25-page-3.png
The image displays an email interface with a view of an unread message. The sender's name is blurred out for privacy, but the subject line appears to be "RE: High". There are several lines of text in the body of the email visible, suggesting a conversation or exchange of information, but the content is too small to read clearly. No people or locations are identifiable from this image due to the close-up view and focus on the email interface. The significant objects in this context include the email message itself and possibly the user's inbox layout depending on the level of detail visible in the image.
EFTA00008920-p-65.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with visible handwriting and typed text on it. At the top of the page, there's a section labeled "Date" followed by numbers "01/25/97," indicating that the date is January 25, 1997. The handwriting seems to be in black ink and includes words like "Yes," "No," "Yes," and "No," suggesting a pattern of questioning or answering. There's also typed text with lines drawn through some portions of it, which makes it difficult to read the full content. Additionally, there are various numbers such as "20," "15," "10," and "8," but without more context, their significance is unclear. The page has a yellowish hue, typical for aged paper or photocopied documents.
EFTA00008920-p-64.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes that appear to be related to an interview conducted by the FBI on December 17th, 2019. The focus of the notes seems to be the questioning about emails, specifically whether the subject mentioned checking emails before or after certain events. There are multiple questions listed and answered with "Yes" or "No." The document appears to be a legal record, possibly from a criminal investigation or court proceeding, given the context provided by visible text on the page.
EFTA00008920-p-08.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a structured format that includes numbered questions and corresponding answers. Due to the resolution and angle of the scan, some words are not entirely legible. The visible parts of the text include phrases such as "Yes" and "No", indicating responses to inquiries. There is also some handwritten text on the document, including corrections or annotations. At the bottom right corner, there seems to be a signature followed by some illegible text, likely identifying an individual associated with the content of the document. The background is predominantly white, making the printed black text and markings stand out prominently.
EFTA00008920-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and markings that are partially obscured due to blackouts. The title of the document is "Civil Action No." followed by a number, indicating it's from a legal proceeding in a court. There are also headings such as "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" and "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK." The name "Brian Stelter" appears on the document, but it is blacked out, suggesting that this could be part of sensitive or private information. The bottom right corner features a stamp or mark indicating "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIALITY." The overall style of the image suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, possibly involving a person whose name is redacted due to confidentiality. The document appears to have been used or handled, as indicated by creases and marks.
EFTA00008892-p-22.jpg
The image appears to be a digital capture of an official document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the context. The main focus is on a section that includes handwritten annotations in red ink. These annotations are primarily corrections and notes, likely made by someone reviewing the document. The text is partially visible and seems to include phrases such as "Deposition Date" and "Redacted for Privacy." There's also a reference to "Court Order No. 15-CV-2467" indicating that this document might be related to case number 15-CV-2467 in court proceedings. The style of the image suggests it has been scanned or photographed and shared through an electronic medium, given the slight blurriness and shadows around the edges, which are common with digital captures rather than printed documents.
EFTA00008863-p-2.jpg
The image appears to be a digital screenshot with various elements that are partially obscured by black rectangles, indicating that information is being censored or redacted. The text and details within the black boxes are not legible due to the obstruction. There seems to be some form of interface or software application visible around these blacked-out sections, but it's difficult to discern any specific content without further context. No people, locations, or distinct objects can be confidently identified due to the heavy redaction in the image.
EFTA00008744-p-085.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with multiple questions and answers listed on it. The questions seem to pertain to an event or situation where individuals are being interviewed or questioned. Due to the low resolution of the image and the quality of the scan, some words are difficult to read, but the text includes phrases like "Answer: No" and "Answer: Yes." There's a visible date at the top right corner that says "09/14/2018." The document has been redacted with black lines across various parts of it, obscuring some information. Additionally, there is a handwritten note in black ink on the bottom left that reads, "Q: How many times was he seen at her house? A: 5." The overall style of the image suggests an official or legal context for these questions and answers.
EFTA00008744-p-060.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with some form of interview or written testimony. There are lines of text that include a question and an answer, suggesting a conversation or questioning process. The specific content is not clear due to the quality of the image, but we can discern the presence of people's names and phrases such as "Yes" and "No" in relation to questions posed, indicating responses during this conversation. The text has been redacted in some areas, which is typically done to conceal sensitive information or private details.
EFTA00008744-p-051.jpg
The image shows a page of typed text on a document, which appears to be a legal transcript from an interview or deposition given by an individual named "Kathleen". The document is numbered at the bottom left corner with "31" and includes headers for sections such as "Q" and "A". There are several lines crossed out in black marker throughout the text, indicating portions that have been redacted or deemed sensitive. Additionally, there's a handwritten note on the page saying "No redactions - not related to case" with an arrow pointing downwards towards the text, suggesting instructions for handling this document.
EFTA00008744-p-047.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten content and several questions and answers. The person whose responses are provided is identified as "John" on the line at the top. The document appears to be an interview transcript, given the format of question numbers followed by corresponding answers. The text is redacted in multiple places across the document, obscuring certain details that would normally be visible. There are also a few visible phrases such as "Yes," "No," and what seems to be a name "William." At the bottom right corner of the image, there's a portion of text that is too small to read clearly.
EFTA00008744-p-026.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes, possibly from an interview or meeting due to the presence of questions and answers. There's some redacted text in black squares indicating sensitive information has been obscured. The visible portions include phrases like "Yes" and "No" which suggest responding to yes/no questions. The rest is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a structured conversation with follow-up questions and answers. There are no people or locations identified within the image.
EFTA00008744-p-006.jpg
The image appears to be a page from an official document, possibly legal or investigative in nature, given the context and style of the text. The majority of the content is redacted with black lines covering words and phrases that were presumably written here before being obscured. The visible parts include some question numbers (such as "Q: 20") and statements like "Yes" and "No," suggesting that this could be a section where individuals are asked to confirm or deny certain statements or questions relevant to the investigation. The quality of the image is low, with a faded and slightly blurry appearance, making it challenging to discern the text clearly.
EFTA00008716-p-26.jpg
The image displays a text document with a question and answer format. The question at the top reads: "Q: Were you aware of the presence of our buys or devices in Mr Epstein's estate search house and foundation?" Below the question, there are two possible answers labeled as "A" and "B." Answer A states: "No, I did not know about that." Answer B states: "Yes, I have been informed and/or aware of our buys or devices in Mr Epstein's estate search house and foundation." The text is written in a straightforward manner with no embellishments or graphics, focusing solely on the question and answers presented.
EFTA00008708-p-4.jpg
The image displays a handwritten page with notes that appear to be related to a legal case or court proceedings. The writing is somewhat messy and includes references to "Case No.", "Defendant", and "Plaintiff", which suggests the context of a lawsuit. There are also sections labeled 1 through 5, possibly indicating points or topics being addressed in the notes. Additionally, there's mention of a phone call schedule and some redacted text, likely to protect sensitive information. The page is numbered at the bottom right corner, indicating that it is part of a larger document or series of pages.