Documents tagged "confidential"
Found 145 documents with this tag
EFTA00025010-p-4.jpg
The image is of a document with various sections and fields filled out, possibly an application form or official paperwork. It contains some text, numbers, dates, and checkboxes. There are also blank areas where additional information would be written. The layout includes headers, subheadings, and lines for the applicant to fill in their details. At the bottom right corner of the document, there's a watermark that reads "CONFIDENTIAL," indicating the sensitivity or classification level of the content. The photo itself is taken at an angle, with part of the document's top left corner visible and the rest following the curvature of the paper.
EFTA00009116-p-083.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned copy of a document, which seems to be a list of points related to an investigation. The first point visible is "And they are saying that there was no reason to believe that this thing happened at the time it did". The text is typed in black ink on white paper, with some parts blurred out, likely for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document has a formal layout, suggesting it may be of legal or professional nature. The image quality is not very high, making some parts difficult to read clearly.
EFTA00009116-p-062.jpg
The image shows a black and white document that appears to be an interview schedule or script for a news segment or discussion panel. At the top of the page, there are redacted names where the person's name is replaced with "MR" or "MRS," followed by what seems to be their last name, indicating male or female speakers. The text contains topics and questions for each speaker, including issues related to public opinion on political matters, potential for compromise in discussion, and personal reactions. There are numbers next to the names, which might refer to the order of appearance or some other categorization. The document also has redacted phone numbers, indicating a need for confidentiality around these details.
EFTA00009116-p-001.jpg
The image displays a page with printed text, which appears to be an official document or report due to its formal layout and use of numbered sections. The top right corner has the page number "30" indicating that this is one of many pages in the document. The title "Appendix" suggests that this section contains additional information related to the main body of the report. Section 5 of the appendix lists four questions with their corresponding answers, all of which have been redacted or obscured by black marks, making them unreadable for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This is a common practice in official documents where sensitive information must be hidden from public view. At the bottom of the page, there is a footnote labeled "32" with an associated letter "A". However, the content of this footnote is also redacted and not visible. The overall style of the image suggests it is a digital photograph or scan of a physical document, possibly intended for legal or historical archival purposes.
EFTA00009016-p-078.jpg
The image shows a handwritten page with a list of items, each labeled with a letter from A to F and numbered from one to twelve. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle with "CONFIDENTIAL" written in white at the top. Some visible text includes phrases such as "Answers and responses," "no longer have access to my account," and "Did you know that when you use your bank card?" Additionally, there are words like "questions," "problems," "customer support representative," "unauthorized charges," and "dispute." The page appears to be a list of common concerns or issues customers might have with banking services, possibly intended as a guide for customer service representatives.
EFTA00009016-p-038.jpg
The image is a black and white photograph of what appears to be a handwritten page from an interview transcript. The document contains various pieces of information, including numbered questions (e.g., "Question: What happened to you when you were at work on Monday?") and answers typed in a different font. Some parts of the text are obscured by a redacted section marked with a black rectangle and lines through it, indicating that sensitive or confidential information has been removed from the document for privacy reasons. The visible text includes phrases like "I didn't know if I was going to be able to work today" and other statements related to personal experiences at work. At the bottom of the page, there is a question number 26 followed by an answer that seems to relate to a discussion about the witness's feelings or concerns during the described event. The image does not provide any additional context or background details about the interviewer or interviewee, nor does it reveal their identities or affiliations.
EFTA00008920-p-77.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a header at the top that reads "Letterhead" followed by the word "Confidentiality" highlighted in bold. Below this, there's some handwritten text that seems to be crossed out and obscured, making it difficult to read. The background is white, and the handwriting is black ink. There are no visible people or locations within the image, and the only significant object is the document itself.
EFTA00008920-p-46.jpg
The image shows a document with a list of questions on it. The document appears to be related to an investigation or interview, as indicated by the presence of questions such as "What was your relationship with [REDACTED]?" and other inquiries that seem to delve into personal relationships and events. There are also sections where answers have been redacted, which implies confidentiality in certain areas. The document has a header at the top, possibly containing the title or subject matter of the interview or investigation.
EFTA00008920-p-35.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text, which appears to be a form or checklist. The writing is in black ink on a light background. There are lines through some sections and words, indicating they have been crossed out, possibly as part of the process being documented. The visible text includes phrases like "interview summary" and what seems to be questions or prompts related to an interview or assessment session. There are also numbers next to each line, likely for checking off completed items. The image has a personal or confidential feel due to the nature of its content.
EFTA00008920-p-34.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes across it. The document appears to be a form or survey of some sort with sections numbered and questions listed below each number. There are lines for answers, but they have been redacted or obscured with black marks. At the top right corner of the page, there's a watermark that says "Confidential" in an italicized font. The text is too small to read, and any discernible information has been intentionally concealed.
EFTA00008920-p-32.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with redacted information across the entire page. It looks like an official form or report, possibly from a government agency or institution. The redactions are done in a way that covers entire lines and sections of text, ensuring sensitive information is not disclosed. The visible parts show headings such as "Q: 1" and a question at the bottom, but the content is obscured by black marks to maintain privacy or confidentiality. The document also contains a date stamp near the top, though it's difficult to read due to redaction.
EFTA00008920-p-28.jpg
The image is a scanned document with a series of questions and answers related to a legal case. The text on the paper has been redacted, covering up sensitive information and keeping it confidential. The layout suggests that this could be part of a deposition or an interview transcript where each question is followed by its corresponding answer, but the content is not visible in this image due to the redaction.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-10.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document with a table containing questions and answers related to a legal proceeding or investigation. The document appears to be a transcript of testimony given by a person named "Randall A. Cunningham" to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 15, 2004. The handwriting is visible, suggesting that the responses were written out during the interview. There are lines drawn through certain text, indicating that it has been redacted or removed for confidentiality purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and markings that are partially obscured due to blackouts. The title of the document is "Civil Action No." followed by a number, indicating it's from a legal proceeding in a court. There are also headings such as "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" and "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK." The name "Brian Stelter" appears on the document, but it is blacked out, suggesting that this could be part of sensitive or private information. The bottom right corner features a stamp or mark indicating "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIALITY." The overall style of the image suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, possibly involving a person whose name is redacted due to confidentiality. The document appears to have been used or handled, as indicated by creases and marks.
EFTA00008892-p-17.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with several areas redacted, typically done to obscure sensitive information such as personal details or confidential data. At the top of the page, there is some text that appears to be a title or heading, but it's obscured by the redaction marks. Below this, the name "Mr. John Smith" is visible, suggesting it could be an application form or similar document where names are required for identification purposes. The address and date fields are also partially redacted; however, you can see that they refer to a location in New York City on February 15th, but the year is obscured. There's no context provided about the purpose of the document or why it has been redacted, as this would typically be determined by any additional information not visible in the image.
EFTA00008870-p-1.jpg
The image shows a printed document with various sections of text and checkboxes. At the top left corner, there is a watermark that reads "CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER" followed by more text in smaller font. Below this disclaimer, there's a header containing contact information including names, titles, addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers, and email addresses. The document appears to be structured for record-keeping or data collection purposes as indicated by the rows of checkboxes accompanied by blank spaces that presumably would hold printed names. There is also a red barcode with a white number underneath it, suggesting this might be a reference or tracking number for the document.
EFTA00008863-p-3.jpg
The image shows a document from Federal Express, commonly known as FedEx. It is an invoice titled "Federal Express Record" with the company's logo at the top left corner. The document is printed on paper and includes various fields such as shipment date, recipient name, billing information, and totals for shipping charges. There are redacted sections where certain details have been obscured to maintain privacy or confidentiality. A yellow highlighter has been used to emphasize a specific area of the invoice, although it's not clear from this angle what is being highlighted.
EFTA00008744-p-117.jpg
The image displays a list of questions and answers that are written on paper. The paper appears to be an official document, possibly related to a legal or administrative proceeding given the structure and content. The questions are numbered from one to twelve, with each question followed by an answer. Some text is redacted with black lines, indicating sensitive information has been obscured for privacy or confidentiality reasons. There is no visible person in this image, and it does not provide specific locations or other significant objects beyond the written material.
EFTA00008744-p-110.jpg
The image you've sent appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with typed text on it. However, the text is heavily redacted or obscured by black marks, making it impossible to read any specific content. There are visible numbers and lines indicating the structure of the document, possibly a list or notes. The redaction suggests that this could be sensitive information or an official document where confidentiality is crucial.