Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Brian"

Found 5 documents with this tag

EFTA00008920-p-01.jpg

The image shows a document with various texts and markings that are partially obscured due to blackouts. The title of the document is "Civil Action No." followed by a number, indicating it's from a legal proceeding in a court. There are also headings such as "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" and "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK." The name "Brian Stelter" appears on the document, but it is blacked out, suggesting that this could be part of sensitive or private information. The bottom right corner features a stamp or mark indicating "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIALITY." The overall style of the image suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, possibly involving a person whose name is redacted due to confidentiality. The document appears to have been used or handled, as indicated by creases and marks.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt

In this email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and multiple individuals, they discuss scheduling a weekend golf trip with friends at the Trump course in Palm Beach. Additionally, they touch on topics related to aviation, such as an interest in a Hawker 800 XP plane and possible partnerships for acquiring an aircraft in a depressed market. The key people involved include Jeffrey Epstein, Jack Goldberger, Brian Baker from JPMorgan, Joel, and Steve Hanson.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031764.txt

The document discusses an investigation into Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy for allegedly trying to sell government influence. The focus of the investigation includes a plan to extradite a Chinese dissident and claims that Broidy sought $75 million in exchange for ending a Malaysian government corruption probe. It is also mentioned that there are ongoing investigations related to the Trump administration's ties with foreign officials, such as the one involving former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030229.txt

The email discusses the use of paid sources by journalists and refers to the PCC Code for Editors. The sender mentions Maz as a particularly devious person who can pay for information, but notes that criminals cannot sell their stories unless it is in the public interest. It also highlights a loophole where witnesses may be paid if the case involves a bent detective.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030222.txt

The document discusses the topic of voluntary rules in terms of arranging for a cessation of crap articles/stories etc and redress from newspapers. Kevin Maxwell is mentioned as someone who can provide more protection and redress if individual(s) involved in approaches from newspapers are employees or have any form of contractual relationship with the target. Ross Gow states that Maz, an editor, can pay for people, stories, and documents but cannot pay a convicted criminal unless it's in the public interest. The document references the PCC Code for Editors and its prohibition on witness payments in criminal trials.