Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Defendant"

Found 66 documents with this tag

EFTA00009116-p-050.jpg

The image displays a black and white photocopy of a typed document with handwritten notes. The text is organized into numbered sections, suggesting it could be an outline or a list of questions or topics for discussion. There are references to "Defendant" and "Court," indicating that the content might pertain to a legal context such as court proceedings or prepping for a trial defense. The document appears to be a mix of typed text with handwritten corrections or annotations.

EFTA00008998-p-08.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document with typed text on it. The focus is not sharp, and the text is not fully legible due to the quality and angle of the photo. However, it seems to be some sort of legal or official document, possibly related to a court case or investigation, as indicated by the references to "victim" and "defendant" in the visible text. The document is on paper with visible lines that suggest it could have been typed on a typewriter or printed out from a computer with some sort of template. The background behind the document is nondescript and does not provide any additional context about the situation or location where this document was photographed.

EFTA00008920-p-68.jpg

The image is a scanned document with printed text and handwritten notes. The content of the document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by phrases such as "defendant" and "victim," though specific details are redacted in places. Handwritten annotations include questions and comments on the printed text, suggesting an analysis or discussion about its contents. The overall style of the image is that of a formal document with additional commentary added manually.

EFTA00008744-p-001.jpg

The image displays a document with printed text and handwritten markings. The text refers to legal proceedings involving a person named "Defendant's Name." The document is titled "NOTICE OF HEARING" and includes details about the nature of the hearing, which is related to "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit." The visible information indicates that this is an official court-related document, possibly regarding a criminal matter (as suggested by the term "criminal appeal"). The handwritten markings appear to be obscuring or crossing out certain parts of the text, which could indicate sensitive information being redacted for privacy or security reasons.

EFTA00008708-p-4.jpg

The image displays a handwritten page with notes that appear to be related to a legal case or court proceedings. The writing is somewhat messy and includes references to "Case No.", "Defendant", and "Plaintiff", which suggests the context of a lawsuit. There are also sections labeled 1 through 5, possibly indicating points or topics being addressed in the notes. Additionally, there's mention of a phone call schedule and some redacted text, likely to protect sensitive information. The page is numbered at the bottom right corner, indicating that it is part of a larger document or series of pages.

EFTA00008708-p-3.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it. The text is too small and blurry to read clearly, but it seems to contain questions or prompts related to a legal case. It mentions something about the "defendant" and asks for information about their activities during a certain time period. There are references to specific dates and times, as well as requests for explanations of certain events or actions. The writing style is informal, suggesting that this could be notes from an interview or brainstorming session rather than a formal legal document.

EFTA00008631-p-75.jpg

The image is a photograph of what appears to be a court transcript or a similar official document from a legal proceeding. The text within the document includes sections labeled "Q" (for question) and "A" (for answer), with various exchanges between individuals who are identified as "Judge," "Defendant," "Prosecutor," and "Witness." This suggests that the document records a trial or similar legal event where witnesses were questioned by both prosecution and defense. Some of the names have been redacted for privacy purposes. The specific content of the questions and answers is not clearly visible due to the resolution and angle of the photograph.

EFTA00001499-p-1.jpg

The image shows two pieces of paper lying on a tiled floor. The left paper appears to be a form with several checkboxes and lines for writing, though the content is not entirely clear due to the resolution. The right paper also seems to contain text, but it's partially obscured; only the top section with headers such as "Case Number" and "Defendant(s)" is visible, suggesting it might be related to a legal case or court proceedings. There are no people in the image. The style of the photo is candid and informal, likely taken quickly without much attention to composition.

DOJ-OGR-00007471.jpg

The image displays a page from a document with a focus on written text. The text appears to be related to legal proceedings or court decisions, given the presence of phrases such as "Defendant's Motion" and references to sections within law. There are also headings that mention terms like "RESPONSE" and "DISCUSSION." The style is formal and professional, typical of official documents used in legal settings. The text is printed in black ink on a white background, with the document's layout including margins and lines for clarity.

DOJ-OGR-00007427.jpg

The image shows a printed document with several paragraphs of text. The document appears to be an official court document, as indicated by the bold header and footer text that is partially obscured by the paper's edge. The visible portion of the text includes phrases like "Plaintiff," "Defendant," "Motion to Compel Discovery," and "Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss," which suggests legal proceedings are being discussed. There is no image of a person or specific location within this document. The page number "7" is visible at the bottom right corner, indicating that this is part of a larger set of documents.

DOJ-OGR-00007308.jpg

The image is a digital reproduction of an official document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The text appears to be legal in nature, possibly from a court proceeding given the references to evidence and questioning, as well as the use of terms like "Defendant" and "Plaintiff." At the bottom right corner of the page, there's a signature, indicating that it has been reviewed or verified by an individual associated with the legal proceedings. The quality of the image is somewhat low, making some text difficult to read, and parts are obscured by handwritten notes in red ink.

DOJ-OGR-00007299.jpg

The image is a digital screenshot of a document with text that appears to be a court record or legal transcript. The text is structured into numbered lines, indicating various points or items listed in the document. Due to the resolution and quality of the image, it's difficult to read all the details, but there are terms visible such as "Motion", "Defendant", and "Plaintiff", suggesting a legal context. The text is dense and formatted in a way that suggests it could be part of a formal legal proceeding or court case.

DOJ-OGR-00007111.jpg

The image is a digital document with text that appears to be a legal or official paper, possibly related to a court case or legal proceedings given the context of "Case No." and numbered paragraphs with titles such as "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" and mentions of laws and statutes. The specific details are not clear due to the resolution of the image. The text is black on a white background, typical of printed documents or digital scans. There are no visible people, locations, or objects that can be discerned from this description.

DOJ-OGR-00007102.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document or transcript, possibly related to legal proceedings or court records, as suggested by the presence of what seems like case numbers and docket identifiers at the top. The content is predominantly text, which includes headers such as "Defendant" followed by sections labeled with numbers from 10-29. The text itself is too small and blurry to read clearly, but it's structured into columns that may represent different aspects or witnesses in a legal case. There are no visible images of people or locations, and the overall quality of the image suggests it was taken from an electronic source without proper focus on the content.

DOJ-OGR-00007056.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly a legal or official paper with dense text. The content includes lines like "Docket No: 2018-CA-457," "Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," and "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment." There is a signature on the bottom right corner of the document, indicating it may have been signed by someone in an official capacity, such as a judge or a party involved in the proceedings. The image has a grayscale color scheme and the text is too small to read clearly without zooming in.

DOJ-OGR-00006889.jpg

The image displays a document with printed text on its pages. The visible part of the page contains text that appears to be discussing legal matters and possibly court proceedings, as there are phrases like "Defendant's Motion" and "Judge's Decision." There is also a reference to case numbers and a date. The document has headers and footers with different colors and styles, suggesting it might be part of a formal legal report or a court proceeding document. However, the resolution of the image prevents me from providing specific details about the content beyond what can be inferred from this description.

DOJ-OGR-00006675.jpg

The image displays a document from the "United States District Court for the Western District of Washington". The main focus is on a section titled "Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint" which appears to be related to the "Federal Court Case No. C96-1348P". There are names and contact information listed at the bottom, including addresses for several individuals or parties involved in the case. The document is in black and white, and there's a watermark or logo that includes the phrase "U.S. District Court" followed by "Western District of Washington" at the top center.

DOJ-OGR-00006561.jpg

The image displays a document with numbered points and text. The first point is "The Government Failed to Prove that the Defendant Knew his Role was Illegal". It's likely this document contains legal arguments or rulings from a court proceeding, as indicated by references to case laws such as "U.S. v. Edmondson, 965 F.2d 1078 (7th Cir. 1992)" and discussions of criminal activity like "the illegal distribution" and "possession with intent to distribute". The text is black against a white background, suggesting it's a standard letter or legal document.

DOJ-OGR-00006544.jpg

The image is a digital document with a plain background and a header that includes the page number and possibly a reference number or docket number. It contains several paragraphs of text which appear to be part of an official legal or administrative document. The font is typical for professional documents, and the layout suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, given the references to "Defendant" and discussion about evidence and testimony. There are no visible images or graphics within the document; only text is present.

DOJ-OGR-00006402.jpg

The image is a scanned document with text on it, which appears to be a section of a legal or formal document given the context and formatting such as numbered sections and headers. The visible text includes a heading that reads "VII. Before Entering Evidence or Argument the Defendant's Counsel Intends to Raise Objections and/or Motions," followed by a sub-section titled "Motion in Limine No. 14." There is also an indication of page number at the bottom right corner, which suggests this document may be part of a larger document set or book. The text is dense with black ink on a white background, and there are no images or illustrations within the visible portion of the scanned document.

Page 1 of 4Next