Documents tagged "Decision"
Found 10 documents with this tag
EFTA00009016-p-017.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned page of text, possibly from an official document or report given the context and layout. It has numbered sections with headings like "Reasons for Decision" which suggests it is part of a legal, administrative, or formal decision-making process. The visible text includes phrases such as "What was the issue in dispute?" indicating that the page discusses matters relevant to conflict resolution or case assessment. There are also numbers such as "20" and "15", possibly indicating page numbers or section numbers within a larger document. The quality of the image is somewhat faded and there's an indication of handwritten notes on the page with the number "49" visible in one corner.
DOJ-OGR-00006889.jpg
The image displays a document with printed text on its pages. The visible part of the page contains text that appears to be discussing legal matters and possibly court proceedings, as there are phrases like "Defendant's Motion" and "Judge's Decision." There is also a reference to case numbers and a date. The document has headers and footers with different colors and styles, suggesting it might be part of a formal legal report or a court proceeding document. However, the resolution of the image prevents me from providing specific details about the content beyond what can be inferred from this description.
DOJ-OGR-00006258.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a physical document, possibly a letter or a report. The text is partially legible but shows that the document may contain information related to a specific case, decision, or legal matter. The visible parts of the text include words such as "Case" and "Decision" followed by dates. There are also mentions of a party or parties involved in the case, with names like "WILLIAM" and "THE MORLEY COMPANY". The document is structured with headings and paragraphs, which suggests it could be an official or formal type of correspondence. The style of the image is straightforward, focusing on capturing the content of the paper.
DOJ-OGR-00026054.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text on it. The text is partially obscured and includes various paragraphs with headings such as "Summary of Decision" and "Reasons for Decision." There are also references to dates and case numbers, like "August 12th, 2019" and "File No: A-375-18." The document appears to be a legal or administrative decision, possibly from a court proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021929.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly an official form or notice given the header and layout. The top of the page has text that is partially obscured but includes "United States District Court" and seems to reference an Order or Decision from a court case or proceeding. Below this header, there are lines for information such as docket number, date filed, and other details related to the legal document. There's also space provided for signatures, indicating that this form requires acknowledgment or approval by certain parties. The visible text is too small to read clearly in its entirety, but it seems to be a formal legal document with standard sections for court orders or decisions.
DOJ-OGR-00021894.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document page, with a focus on the title and the first paragraph. The title reads "P. The District Court's Decision to Dismiss New Trial Motion from new trial motion from defendant" in bold font. Below this, there is a paragraph that starts with a sentence mentioning that the court has reviewed certain filings and evidence submitted by the parties involved in a legal proceeding. However, the rest of the text is too small to read clearly. The photograph appears to be taken under indoor lighting conditions, as indicated by the shadow cast on the right side of the document. The paper looks like standard photocopy or printer paper, and there are no people or identifiable locations visible in the image.
DOJ-OGR-00021811.jpg
The image displays a document titled "P. The District Court of New York's Decision to Dismiss the Motion." It appears to be an official legal document discussing court proceedings related to a specific case in New York. The text includes references to "Plaintiff," "Defendant," and various legal points and arguments that are typical in such documents. The font is formal, suggesting the gravity of the legal context. There are no visible people or other objects aside from the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
The image is a photograph of what appears to be an official document with red text and black borders at the top and bottom. The visible text includes phrases such as "DATED", "DECISION NO.", "APPELLANT", and "DATE OF JUDGMENT", suggesting that this is a formal legal or administrative notice. There are handwritten notes in red ink on the document, with the words "Received Decision" visible among them. The photo is taken at an angle where the text is partially obscured by shadows and glare from overhead lighting, making some of the details difficult to read. The document's background is a muted grey tone, possibly due to the paper's color or lighting conditions when the photograph was taken.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028654.jpg
The image displays a document with a title that reads "Year of Decision US Policy toward Iran in 2013" by James L. Jones Jr. The date at the top is indicated as February 7, 2013. Below the title and date, there's an affiliation stated as "Non-Resident Senior Fellow - Brookings Institution" for James L. Jones Jr. The document appears to be a formal text with headings, likely outlining policy decisions or discussions from that year. The font is standard, indicating a professional setting such as academia or government work. There are no visible images of people or specific locations within the text block shown in the image.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt
The document discusses a statement made by Disney CEO Bob Iger regarding President Trump's decision to rescind an Obama-era program that allowed young undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States. Iger described this decision as "cruel" and "misguided," and expressed his concern for the futures of these individuals.