Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Summary Judgment"

Found 10 documents with this tag

DOJ-OGR-00007111.jpg

The image is a digital document with text that appears to be a legal or official paper, possibly related to a court case or legal proceedings given the context of "Case No." and numbered paragraphs with titles such as "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" and mentions of laws and statutes. The specific details are not clear due to the resolution of the image. The text is black on a white background, typical of printed documents or digital scans. There are no visible people, locations, or objects that can be discerned from this description.

DOJ-OGR-00007092.jpg

The image displays a page of printed text with various lines and phrases crossed out. The document appears to be a legal proceeding or court document, as indicated by the formal language and structure. There are references to statutes and legal proceedings such as "Motion for Summary Judgment" and mentions of a case number. The text is dense and includes citations and explanations regarding rules and regulations. The page itself has numbered lines on the left margin, suggesting it's part of a larger document or transcript.

DOJ-OGR-00007056.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly a legal or official paper with dense text. The content includes lines like "Docket No: 2018-CA-457," "Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," and "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment." There is a signature on the bottom right corner of the document, indicating it may have been signed by someone in an official capacity, such as a judge or a party involved in the proceedings. The image has a grayscale color scheme and the text is too small to read clearly without zooming in.

DOJ-OGR-00026538.jpg

The image is a photograph of a printed document with multiple pages placed on top of each other, showing only the topmost page clearly. The document appears to be related to a court case, as indicated by terms like "Defendant," "Plaintiff," and "Motion for Summary Judgment." There are also references to evidence, such as Exhibit A, B, C, D, and E. The text is black on white paper with various handwritten annotations in red ink; these include words like "objection" and "motion granted/denied" near specific sections of the document, suggesting that this page has been reviewed or marked during a legal proceeding.

DOJ-OGR-00022023.jpg

The image displays a document titled "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK." The text is formal and legal in nature. It mentions a case captioned "COUNSEL," followed by the names of counsel involved in the case: "Michael J. Sternberg, ESQ." There are references to court proceedings such as "Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," indicating a legal decision made by the court. At the bottom, there is an order dated April 13, 2018, which states: "SO ORDERED." The document is signed and contains stamps and codes typically found on official court documents.

DOJ-OGR-00021307.jpg

The image you've provided appears to be a digital representation of a document, possibly an official report or a legal case summary. It features printed text that is partially obscured by the watermark "Confidential" diagonally across it. The visible text includes a heading and what seems to be paragraphs with lines such as "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" followed by a date, indicating an action or event related to legal proceedings. There are also references to a court case number, a judge's name, and a location. Due to the watermark and text being cut off at the edges, it's not possible to provide more detailed information about the content of the document.

DOJ-OGR-00020769.jpg

The image is a document with visible text, which appears to be an email or message containing information that seems to be related to a legal case or court proceedings. The page number "74" is indicated at the top of the document, suggesting it is part of a larger set of documents. The text mentions references such as "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" and discusses evidence and arguments pertaining to a motion in a legal case. There are also various terms like "Affidavit," "Plaintiff," "Defendant," and "Motion," which are common in legal contexts. The text is dense with information and reads from the top left downwards towards the bottom right of the image.

DOJ-OGR-00020612.jpg

The image is a scanned document titled "Case No: 1:02-cv-05650" with the word "DISTRICT COURT" above it. The document appears to be a legal filing or court order, featuring numbered paragraphs and redacted text, indicating sensitive information has been obscured. The visible part of the first paragraph mentions "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" and refers to "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment." The case number is repeated at the top right corner with a barcode underneath.

DOJ-OGR-00020589.jpg

The image displays a document with visible text and sections. At the top of the page, there is a date "December 2016" and a location indicator that reads "Austin, Texas." Below this information, there's a title or section heading that says "COURT OF APPEALS." The central part of the document contains text which appears to be related to legal proceedings or case details. It includes various checkboxes with accompanying text such as "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," suggesting a list of options or responses related to court actions. The text is too small and blurry to read in detail. The overall appearance of the document suggests it might be from a legal case file, possibly a motion filed within a court system. The style of the image is that of a standard photograph taken of a physical piece of paper.

DOJ-OGR-00011744.jpg

The image appears to be a digital scan of a document with handwritten notes on it. The content of the text is not fully clear due to the angle and quality of the image, but there are several paragraphs with lines through them, indicating they have been crossed out or deleted. In addition, there are annotations made in blue ink, including underlines, circles, and a numbering system starting at "3" and going up to "28." The document seems to be related to some form of legal proceedings or official notes, as suggested by the reference to "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" and other phrases that are typically found in court documents.