Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Affidavit"

Found 5 documents with this tag

EFTA00008920-p-71.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document with some blacked-out sections, suggesting that sensitive information has been redacted. The visible parts show what seems to be an affidavit or statement from an individual who is identified as a witness for the prosecution in a court case, likely related to a criminal investigation or trial. There are checkboxes and spaces for answers next to questions about the witness's identity, their knowledge of the subject matter, and whether they would like the opportunity to read any questions aloud. The name of the person making the statement is redacted, as well as other details that could potentially reveal personal information or compromise the legal process. The document has a formal layout with headers and numbered paragraphs, indicating it is an official court document.

EFTA00008744-p-075.jpg

The image is a scanned document, primarily textual with a few handwritten annotations. It appears to be an official form or report, possibly from a legal or law enforcement context given the content and format. The top of the document includes various sections with headers such as "AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE" and "AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT FOR THE INFANT CHILD." The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to consist of questions (labeled Q) followed by answers (labeled A). The handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain words or phrases, which could indicate redaction, correction, or emphasis. There's also a handwritten note on the right side that says "See page 10" next to what appears to be a date "7/3/2011." The document is filled with lines and text in a structured format, typical of formal written records, suggesting it could be part of an investigation or legal proceedings where evidence and statements are documented.

DOJ-OGR-00020769.jpg

The image is a document with visible text, which appears to be an email or message containing information that seems to be related to a legal case or court proceedings. The page number "74" is indicated at the top of the document, suggesting it is part of a larger set of documents. The text mentions references such as "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" and discusses evidence and arguments pertaining to a motion in a legal case. There are also various terms like "Affidavit," "Plaintiff," "Defendant," and "Motion," which are common in legal contexts. The text is dense with information and reads from the top left downwards towards the bottom right of the image.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt

The document discusses an incident in which a female aide to a Republican senator leaked the Anita Hill affidavit, revealing a conversation among Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson. The three men were discussing charges brought by Anita Hill that had been ignored by the Judiciary Committee. In this conversation, they jokingly acknowledged the truth of Professor Hill's allegations.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017830.txt

The document discusses the legal proceedings related to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. It focuses on the jurisdictional issues concerning certain defendants and their connections to the United States. The court rules that some claims against individual defendants are dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, while plaintiffs are entitled to jurisdictional discovery regarding defendant Privatbank's activities in the United States from 1992-1998. Additionally, the court grants summary judgment on certain claims related to sovereign immunity and international law.