Documents tagged "Rule"
Found 18 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00007188.jpg
The image shows a printed page with black text on it. It appears to be a legal document or formal statement, as indicated by the reference to "Rule" and what seems to be the discussion of case law or rules of evidence. The content is dense and consists primarily of text, without any images or diagrams. The style of the image is straightforward and informational, typical for official documents or court proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00007156.jpg
The image displays a document with text that appears to be from a legal proceeding or a court case, as indicated by the header text at the top. The document contains lines of text in black font on a white background. There are sections with numbered items, suggesting a list or enumerated points related to the proceedings. Additionally, there's a reference to "Rule 47" which is commonly associated with court procedures. The text also mentions terms like "motion," "court records," and "document," further indicating the legal context of the document.
DOJ-OGR-00006916.jpg
The image displays a printed document with several paragraphs of text. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings or governmental matters, as it references "Rule 50" and the "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California." There are also some names mentioned, such as "Karen Manno" and "Judge Vince Chhabria." Additionally, there is a reference to a case from "2014." The text is on lined paper with a blue line visible at the bottom, suggesting it might be a standard notebook or notepad used for official notes.
DOJ-OGR-00006775.jpg
The image displays a page of what appears to be a legal document or court proceedings. The text is dense and contains references such as "Rule 26(a)," suggesting it's related to civil litigation in the United States. There are sections marked with headings like "DISCOVERY COMPLETED BY THE PARTIES" and subsections that detail various discovery-related matters. The background is a plain gray color, typical for legal documents or printed text.
DOJ-OGR-00006349.jpg
The image displays a printed document with numerous lines of text. The font is standard, and the print quality appears to be good. At the top left corner, there's a footer with text that includes a date, page number, and possibly some reference or case number: "December 2013, Page 47, 64819/2013." The visible content of the document seems to relate to legal matters as indicated by the text which references court cases and statutes such as "Rule 15(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." The overall style of the image is informational and formal.
DOJ-OGR-00002518.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of an official document with a focus on legal or regulatory information. The document contains a section titled "Rule 17a-5(d)" and includes the date December 28, 1934. There is visible text that discusses certain aspects related to books, records, and other accounting practices required for registered broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The image also shows a page number ("Page 5") at the bottom left corner.
DOJ-OGR-00021564.jpg
The image is a blurry and low resolution photograph of what appears to be an official document with printed text. The document has a header that includes the title "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure" followed by the number 26. The body of the text is dense, suggesting it contains legal statutes or regulations. There are visible page numbers indicating this image shows pages 1 through 4. Due to the low quality and blurriness of the photo, the specific content of the text is difficult to read.
DOJ-OGR-00021062.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a section titled "17 CFR Part 205" printed at the top right corner. Below the title, there is a list of text entries, each beginning with a number and followed by a phrase or sentence in capital letters. The visible numbers and phrases include "Rule 204(b)," "Rule 204(e)," and "17 CFR 205.2." There are no people or significant objects other than the text on the document. The quality of the image is somewhat low, making it difficult to read certain parts of the text clearly.
DOJ-OGR-00020968.jpg
The image is a digital representation of a printed document with a gray background and black text. At the top, there is a header containing information that seems to be related to the case number "03-07674" and the page number "158." The main body of the text appears to discuss a legal matter, specifically mentioning "Rule 902(b)," which refers to rules of evidence in the context of court proceedings. The document includes references to witness testimony, with phrases such as "witness is credible," and it also touches on issues like the credibility of hearsay statements by witnesses. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects outside of the text itself; the focus is solely on the printed content.
DOJ-OGR-00002865.jpg
The image is a scanned document with a header that includes the address "105 W. B Street" and appears to be a page from an official court case file or legal report. The body of the text is focused on discussing the admissibility of expert testimony in court, specifically referring to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. It mentions that the witness's proposed opinion would not assist the trier of fact, and therefore it should be excluded from the trial. There are signatures at the bottom of the document, indicating approval or validation by authorized parties. The style of the image is typical for legal documents, with formal text and professional layout.
DOJ-OGR-00014591.jpg
The image shows a scanned document with handwritten notes on it. The document appears to be of a legal or official nature, as suggested by the header that mentions "Rule 107" and the footer with text and numbers that are partially obscured. There is visible text within the body of the document, but the words are too small to read clearly in this description. The handwritten notes on the page seem to be related to the content of the document, possibly indicating underlined or highlighted sections for further review. The style of the image suggests it was taken with a camera aimed at a physical document, and there is some reflection visible on the surface, likely from overhead lighting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt
The document discusses a legal case involving Jane Doe and Donald Trump, among others. The case was voluntarily dismissed against all defendants according to a notice of voluntary dismissal filed by Meagher, Thomas on November 4th, 2016. The communication is confidential and intended only for the addressee, with unauthorized use or disclosure being strictly prohibited.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026248.txt
The document discusses a memorandum containing classified information provided to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in relation to its oversight activities. The committee has voted to disclose this memorandum publicly and has forwarded it to the President, arguing that releasing it would serve the public interest. The White House expresses concern about the potential negative impact of unilateral release of classified information by the Legislative Branch, which raises significant separation of powers concerns.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025143.txt
The document discusses the relationship between intelligence and parasites in Africa. It suggests that while parasite load has a negative effect on individual intelligence in both Africa and the US, it also has a positive effect on biological diversity and genetic selection for certain groups. The author notes that hominids have always emerged from Africa due to its high genetic variability, which is especially true for smaller organisms like parasites. This leads to the observation that migration tends to follow the pattern of moving from tropics to temperate to arctic regions, with rare exceptions such as salamanders. The author also notes that while many studies show a strong tendency for whites in the US to live in healthy environments and blacks in inferior habitats, it is important to consider the broader environmental factors at play when studying intelligence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.txt
The U.S. Supreme Court has lowered the standard for proving insider trading involving tipping family or friends in the case of Salman v. U.S. The court held that a gift of inside information to a family or friend is sufficient to prove insider trading tipping liability, even if there is no valuable quid pro quo exchange. This narrows the previous requirement under Newman that required proof of pecuniary benefit or similarly valuable personal benefit. It will likely embolden the government to bring more similar cases as it becomes easier for them to prove a "gift" to a "friend" than a financial gain.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017830.txt
The document discusses the legal proceedings related to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. It focuses on the jurisdictional issues concerning certain defendants and their connections to the United States. The court rules that some claims against individual defendants are dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, while plaintiffs are entitled to jurisdictional discovery regarding defendant Privatbank's activities in the United States from 1992-1998. Additionally, the court grants summary judgment on certain claims related to sovereign immunity and international law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013796.txt
The document provides praise for the book "The 4-Hour Workweek" by Tim Ferriss. The book discusses alternative ways of working and living that allow people to have more time for personal pursuits, such as travel and hobbies. It includes quotes from various experts and figures in business and self-help fields who endorse the concepts presented in the book.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.