Documents tagged "Northern District"
Found 26 documents with this tag
EFTA00005578-p-8.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a header that reads "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE." The date on the document is partially obscured but seems to end with "July 29th," and there is a line for information about the party served which has been redacted or marked out with a black line. At the bottom of the image, there's an address that includes "Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division" and contact information with a phone number. The document has a formal appearance typical of legal correspondence.
DOJ-OGR-00006953.jpg
The image shows a document from the United States District Court for California's Northern District. It appears to be an official court order or decision, with various sections including the title "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA" and several paragraphs of text that are likely part of a legal proceeding. The document is dated December 2017, as indicated by the year visible at the top right corner. It's not possible to discern specific details about the case or the contents of the document due to its resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00006916.jpg
The image displays a printed document with several paragraphs of text. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings or governmental matters, as it references "Rule 50" and the "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California." There are also some names mentioned, such as "Karen Manno" and "Judge Vince Chhabria." Additionally, there is a reference to a case from "2014." The text is on lined paper with a blue line visible at the bottom, suggesting it might be a standard notebook or notepad used for official notes.
DOJ-OGR-00006684.jpg
The image displays a scanned document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The document contains details such as case numbers, titles, and names associated with court actions. It includes information about a hearing scheduled on March 31st in room C-204 at the federal courthouse in Amarillo. The background is primarily textured white, indicating that this might be an internal or official document rather than something intended for public viewing.
DOJ-OGR-00006587.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document titled "United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division" at the top. The document appears to be an official court form with preprinted fields and instructions. It includes lines for information such as the title of the case, nature of suit code, civil action number, case status, and other details typically found in legal documents. There is also a section titled "CASES" with columns for case number, style of case, term, docketed by, and filed date. The form has been partially filled out; however, the specific details are not clearly visible due to the resolution of the image.
DOJ-OGR-00006517.jpg
The image displays a document with text that appears to be a court case docket from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The names listed on the document include "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" and an individual named "CATHLEEN MURPHY." The case number is clearly visible, along with other procedural identifiers such as a reference to "GOVERNMENT MOTION." There are also dates, locations (e.g., San Francisco), and the names of attorneys associated with the case. The style of the document is formal and utilitarian, typical for legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00006172.jpg
The image is a document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings or official matters within the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The specific content of the text is not entirely clear due to the resolution and size of the image, but it includes headings and paragraphs that are likely part of a decision, order, or court filing. There are also visible page numbers indicating this is only one part of a larger document set. The top right corner has an embossed seal which typically represents the authority of the court, in this case, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
DOJ-OGR-00026678.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes and markings. It appears to be an official form with printed headings, including "Northern District of Georgia United States Court" at the top left corner. The form has sections labeled with various terms such as "Plaintiff," "Defendant," "Action Number," and "Date Filed." These sections are outlined with red lines to highlight them, possibly for review or correction purposes. There is also handwritten text that seems to be instructions or annotations related to the form's completion. The document appears to be from a legal or court context, given the nature of its content and layout.
DOJ-OGR-00025915.jpg
The image appears to be a document from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The text is partially obscured, but it mentions "Rebecca J. Riebe" and includes a handwritten signature that might belong to someone named "Robert M. Dawson." The document seems to be a letter or notification sent by one party to another regarding court proceedings, as indicated by phrases like "your presence at the above hearing."
DOJ-OGR-00021993.jpg
The image is a close-up of a document with the header "United States District Court" followed by "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio" at the top. There's a line indicating that this case has been assigned to a specific judge, which is not clearly visible in this part of the image. The text includes case numbers and other legal terminology, but specific details are too small to read. The style of the document suggests it's an official court form or notice with formal formatting and structure.
DOJ-OGR-00021971.jpg
The image is a document titled "United States District Court Northern District of California". There's a line that says "Notice of Pleading" and the date "10/29/15". Below that, there are names including "Tova Noel", "Andrew Wa", and "Wa", each in their own line.
DOJ-OGR-00021942.jpg
The image displays a form titled "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas" with various sections containing checkboxes and instructions related to court procedures. There is text indicating that this is an official document from the federal judicial system, specifically for a district court within Texas. The visible part of the form includes options for parties to select if they are seeking relief or have filed certain types of documents in the case. However, due to the resolution and angle of the image, specific details such as names, case numbers, and other personal or sensitive information may not be clearly readable.
DOJ-OGR-00021886.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document, specifically a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The title "ORDER" is prominently displayed at the top in bold letters. Below the title are the names of the judge and the case number. The text within the document is related to a legal matter involving the U.S. Department of Justice, NASA, and SpaceX. There is no visible text that would identify any individuals or locations other than those mentioned in the context of the court order.
DOJ-OGR-00021824.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document titled "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit". The top right corner features a barcode with numbers beneath it, likely for tracking purposes. Below the title, there's a section labeled "Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas", indicating the origin of the appeal. The document appears to be an official court filing, possibly related to a legal case appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. It includes details such as a case number and sections titled 'Docketed' and 'Filed' with corresponding dates.
DOJ-OGR-00021750.jpg
The image displays a section of a document, which appears to be an official court order from the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The text is redacted in various parts, including sensitive information such as names and contact details. However, visible portions show that it's related to a case number and includes standard legal language. There are no people or significant objects other than what appears to be a court seal at the top left corner of the document.
DOJ-OGR-00021506.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be a formal legal notice. The document is titled "NOTICE OF SUBPOENA" and includes the date of September 12, 2008. It refers to an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding a matter between two entities: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Microsoft Corporation. The notice outlines instructions for responding to the subpoena, indicating that the recipient is required to produce certain documents and provide testimony related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
The image is of a printed document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings. The visible text mentions "United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas" and includes references to "Plaintiff" and "Defendants." It also refers to the filing of an amended complaint and the scheduling of a case management conference. There are no people, locations, or significant objects besides the text in the image. The document is presented on a piece of paper with lines that indicate a formal structure for legal documentation.
DOJ-OGR-00008870.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois" and a subheading "Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber" at the top. Below this, there is a list titled "Plaintiffs' Witness List" which includes names such as "Jane Doe" and other fictitious names often used in court documents to protect privacy. The document has visible redactions, with lines drawn through certain parts of the text, likely to obscure sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. The background is a standard white paper, and there's no additional context provided beyond what can be read from the text on the document itself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.txt
The Miami U.S. Attorney's Office has recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case and reassigned it to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta. The Justice Department is under a deadline for prosecutors to confer with the victims' attorneys in an effort to settle the case, but former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta broke the law when he concealed a plea agreement from more than 30 underage girls who had been sexually abused by Epstein. AG nominee Barr pledged to look into the handling of the Epstein case if confirmed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.txt
This email discusses the Jeffrey Epstein case and its handling by the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office. The office has recused itself from the case and it is now under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, overseen by Byung J. "BJay" Pak. The Justice Department has a deadline to confer with the victims' attorneys on the case, which involves issues related to their rights as well as those of Epstein's alleged underage victims.