Documents tagged "Privileged"
Found 85 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028968.jpg
The image displays an email interface with a partially obscured view of the content. There's a header that reads "Privileged - Confidential" indicating the nature of the communication. The sender's name is redacted for privacy, but it appears to be a corporate or professional address. The subject line contains text that is blurred out, and there's a short message visible at the bottom of the screen which seems to relate to legal matters. The overall style suggests this image might have been taken from an email application on a computer screen, given the presence of scrollbars and the typical layout of email clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt
The document discusses a book by Patterson that could be published in August, which presents some time frame issues for the recipients. They are advised to pursue a competing book or documentary after that, and to consider Trump as an opportunity to make their story about something other than themselves while framing their own narrative. It is suggested that they go public with an op-ed, television interview, and social media efforts, and that a strategic plan involving their public identity, philanthropic activities, and development of media allies should be put in place.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails between Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding a case involving someone named Jane Doe. The conversation includes topics such as the scheduling of depositions for Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Trump, service on Maxwell, and an emergency protective order. It is not clear from this summary who Mr. Trump or Ms. Maxwell are, but they may be parties involved in the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033503.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of service on two individuals named Maxwell and Trump, who are likely defendants in a legal case. The names are redacted to maintain confidentiality. The emails also reference Jane Doe as a plaintiff or witness in the case. Jacquie Johnson appears to be a paralegal at Burman Critton Lutier & Coleman, and Jessica Cadwell is another individual involved in the discussion. The content of the emails suggests that efforts are being made to obtain information from these individuals for legal purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of legal proceedings involving a person named Jane Doe and another individual. Key people in the conversation include Jessica Cadwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Jacquie Johnson, and Maxwell. The conversations take place between August 11 and 12, 2009, and refer to efforts to serve legal documents on various individuals involved in the case. The location of these emails is West Palm Beach, FL.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032975.txt
The document is an email conversation between Jeffrey E. and Darren Indyke about updates on a business matter. It mentions the use of checks for payments but suggests that wires might be more convenient due to time differences and travel schedules. The communication also includes some personal information, indicating a close relationship between the individuals involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt
The document involves several people discussing business-related topics. Etienne Binant and Lang Caroline are mentioned as important contacts. Trump's presence in the discussion suggests a potential political angle to their work. The focus is on making an impact on young, talented individuals in the art industry by supporting them directly rather than through galleries, which allows them to reach a broader audience.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt
In this email exchange from February 2017, Jeffrey E. and Etienne Binant discuss the status of a project they are working on together. They mention that they have been busy due to Trump's activities, but they are now ready to start on the project. They also discuss the importance of going directly to the source for their artists, as galleries can help them reach a broader audience. It is suggested that Jeffrey E. should go to LA or Berlin in order to meet with some of these artists in person.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032892.txt
The email conversation involves several people discussing an inquiry from the WSJ about a Jane Doe case involving Trump and Epstein. The email chain includes Michael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Darren Indyke, Joe Palazzolo, a staff reporter at the WSJ, and Jeffrey E. Jeevacation@gmail.com. It appears that they are discussing how to respond to the inquiry from the WSJ regarding the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032861.txt
The email discusses attorney-client privilege and mentions a book being published about Patterson. The author suggests using Trump as an opportunity to create a counter narrative to the book and offers advice on how to handle public appearances. There is also a mention of creating a strategic plan involving philanthropic activities, media allies, and social media efforts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032657.txt
The document is an email between Darren Indyke and Jeffrey Epstein, with information about their law firm, contact details, and confidentiality notices. The content of the emails appears to be sensitive or confidential, given the presence of attorney-client privilege notices and references to "inside information".
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032496.txt
The document is a private email exchange between Darren Indyke and Jeffrey Epstein, with legal and confidential information about financial matters being discussed. The communication emphasizes the attorney-client privilege and confidentiality of the contents within the message. It also mentions the location of the sender, which is New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt
In an email from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein, Indyke mentions a conversation he had with Etienne Binant regarding the mode of payment for a transaction. Binant suggests using wires and having an online code for payments. Indyke responds that checks are more cumbersome but can be used if necessary. The email emphasizes the importance of confidentiality and attorney-client privilege in their communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt
In this email exchange, Darren Indyke and Etienne Binant discuss financial matters such as using wire transfers instead of checks for payments, organizing everything online through an internet code, and possibly implementing a "checks and balances" control with a cap on wiring powers. They also discuss the need for someone to keep track of receipts and inventory before shipping proofs to each other.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032467.txt
The document is about various people discussing financial matters, particularly the process of activating accounts and accessing internet banking. The key individuals mentioned in the conversation are Darren Indyke, Jeffrey E., Etienne Binant, Lang Caroline, and Arianna Cali. The context of the discussion involves making sure that necessary steps have been taken to start the ball rolling on financial matters, such as providing access to internet banking and keeping track of progress with artists' work.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt
The document is a series of email exchanges between several individuals regarding an update on an account/wire and internet banking access. Key people mentioned include Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein, Etienne Binant, and Caroline Lang. The discussions touch upon topics such as art fairs or shows, artists' studios and homes, supporting great artists, galleries, the importance of being at the source for talented individuals, and making a difference in their ecosystem.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt
The document is an email exchange between two individuals, Miller and Jeffrey E., discussing confidential information that may be privileged or contain inside information. The content of the emails is not disclosed due to confidentiality and legal privilege. Both parties emphasize the importance of protecting the information contained in their communications.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032339.txt
The email contains information about an article in the Daily Mail which discusses a woman who made allegations of sexual assault against both Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein when she was 13 years old. The sender expresses skepticism about the veracity of these claims, suggesting that the story might be fabricated. The recipient of the email is advised to handle this information with care due to its sensitive nature.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt
This document discusses a legal case involving the dismissal of charges against a plaintiff named Jane Doe against defendants including Donald Trump. The case is titled "Doe v. Trump et al" and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York under case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA. The court documents indicate that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the charges against all defendants. The document is marked "Privileged - Redacted" and includes instructions for public access users regarding downloading copies of documents for free or at a fee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032331.txt
The document contains an email exchange between two individuals, with one individual asking the other for assistance on a matter related to Jeffrey Epstein. The recipient of the email is a lawyer at a law firm in New York City. The sender of the original message is Michael Miller from House Oversight and the topic of the discussion is not specified in this summary. The email contains a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case involving Donald Trump and others, but it's unclear how this relates to Jeffrey Epstein or the assistance being requested.