Documents tagged "Privileged"
Found 85 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt
The document discusses a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case filed against Donald Trump and others. The plaintiff(s) have dismissed the action against all defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This dismissal was filed by Jane Doe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA, and document number 15.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032306.txt
The document discusses an inquiry from the WSJ regarding a case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. The conversation includes several individuals, including Michael Miller from Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Jeffrey E., and Darren Indyke. They are all discussing deadlines and the need for comments on behalf of Epstein. It appears to be a sensitive legal matter, as indicated by the frequent use of phrases like "privileged" and "confidential information."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032304.txt
This document is a forwarded email chain regarding an inquiry from The Wall Street Journal about a case involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Michael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, has been CC'd on the emails as he is likely to be involved in responding to the WSJ's inquiries. Joseph Palazzolo, a staff reporter from The Wall Street Journal, is asking for a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein and expects to have the story online within a couple of hours.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt
This document appears to be an email chain discussing the attorney-client privilege, with several key figures mentioned including Martin G. Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Darren Indyke. The topic of a book by Patterson is also discussed in relation to the need for an immediate counter narrative and potential strategies such as going public and using social media efforts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails discussing the publication of a book by Patterson in August. The main concern is about competing book or documentary projects before that time frame. Trump is suggested as an opportunity for an immediate counter narrative, which would involve becoming an anti-Trump voice and going public with a message. A strategic plan involving the individual's public identity, philanthropic activities, media allies, and social media efforts is also recommended.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032233.txt
The document is an email exchange between a reporter from ABC News investigative unit, Martin G. Weinberg, and Jeffrey Epstein's team member Kathy Ruemmler regarding the former President Clinton's connection to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The reporter expresses interest in understanding the case better and requests a meeting with Kathy Ruemmler to discuss the subject off-the-record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.txt
The document discusses a lawsuit filed by Katie Johnson against Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in federal court in California alleging that they raped her in 1994. The lawsuit was forwarded to Jeff Epstein with the question of whether he would like to speak or offer a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein. It is mentioned that Reuters wants to make sure the story is fair before publishing and are looking for comments from Mr. Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032063.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing a news article about a federal judge ordering a hearing in a lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump raped a woman when she was 13 years old. The recipients include Michael Miller, Jeffrey E. (jeevacation@gmail.com), and Reid Weingarten, among others. One recipient, Darren Indyke, is mentioned as the sender of one email in the chain, although his role or involvement is not clear from the text provided. The email chain also includes a disclaimer stating that the information is confidential and may be attorney-client privileged, indicating legal significance to the content being discussed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt
The document discusses a hearing in Donald Trump's rape lawsuit case, with attorney Martin G. Weinberg mentioning revisions to the opposition by DKI and providing two attachments: "Privileged - Redacted" and "HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032062". The message is marked as "attorney-client privileged" and it's intended only for the use of the addressee, and it contains confidential information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt
The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Jay Lefkowitz, discussing a series of questions about Epstein's life and activities. The questions focus on topics such as his involvement with the Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation, his business clients, time spent in prison, social life changes, relationships with individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell, reactions to his conviction, thoughts on his sentence, charity initiatives, and personal side of the story. The document mentions that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt
This email exchange involves journalist Alexandra Wolfe asking for an interview with Jeffrey Epstein to discuss his science foundation and the impact of his conviction on his business and social life. The emails were forwarded by Jay Lefkowitz, who was cc'd in one of them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt
The document is a forwarded email from an attorney named Darren K. Indyke, who forwards a Google Alert about Jeffrey Epstein to another person. The alert mentions various topics related to Epstein, including his connection to Trump and Charles Kushner, as well as the possibility of certain tapes involving them. The document emphasizes the confidential nature of its contents and warns against unauthorized use or disclosure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031729.txt
The document contains a series of emails between Tonja Haddad Coleman and Dan Christensen regarding a story about Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss the timeline of events related to Epstein's legal matters and his association with Donald Trump. There is also mention of a flight, suggesting that some travel may be involved in relation to this matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt
This document discusses a lawsuit filed in federal court in California against Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump alleging rape in 1994. The person forwarding the information is asking for comments from Mr. Epstein or on his behalf, and mentions that Reuters News is planning to publish a story about the suit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.txt
This is a sensitive legal document discussing a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump for alleged rape in the mid-1990s. A reporter is seeking comment from Jeffrey Epstein or his attorney to ensure fairness in reporting on the suit, which has been filed in federal court in California. The information is considered privileged and confidential, intended only for the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.txt
The Miami U.S. Attorney's Office has recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case and reassigned it to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta. The Justice Department is under a deadline for prosecutors to confer with the victims' attorneys in an effort to settle the case, but former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta broke the law when he concealed a plea agreement from more than 30 underage girls who had been sexually abused by Epstein. AG nominee Barr pledged to look into the handling of the Epstein case if confirmed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt
The document contains emails discussing a project called Terramar, with mentions of key figures such as Jep and Indyke. There is also reference to an ex-teen prostitute filing a lawsuit in relation to billionaire sex slaves, along with the date September 21, 2015. The communication is intended for specific recipients and contains confidential information that should not be shared or used without authorization.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031418.txt
The document appears to be an email chain discussing the "TERAMAR PROJECT". G Maxwell is mentioned as a key person in the conversation, and there are references to privileged information being shared. The content of the emails suggests that they may be discussing sensitive or confidential matters related to the project.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.txt
This email discusses the Jeffrey Epstein case and its handling by the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office. The office has recused itself from the case and it is now under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, overseen by Byung J. "BJay" Pak. The Justice Department has a deadline to confer with the victims' attorneys on the case, which involves issues related to their rights as well as those of Epstein's alleged underage victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.txt
The Miami U.S. Attorney's Office has recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case, and it has been reassigned to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta. The Justice Department is still under a deadline for prosecutors to confer with victims' attorneys in an effort to settle the case. The case involves allegations that Epstein sexually abused underage girls in Palm Beach.