Documents tagged "Judicial"
Found 4 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
The document is an email notification regarding a notice of voluntary dismissal in case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA "Doe v. Trump et al" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, has voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit against all defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that this case involves some sort of controversy or conflict involving Donald Trump and/or his associates, but the specific details are not provided in this summary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt
This document discusses a legal case involving the dismissal of charges against a plaintiff named Jane Doe against defendants including Donald Trump. The case is titled "Doe v. Trump et al" and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York under case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA. The court documents indicate that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the charges against all defendants. The document is marked "Privileged - Redacted" and includes instructions for public access users regarding downloading copies of documents for free or at a fee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt
The document discusses a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case filed against Donald Trump and others. The plaintiff(s) have dismissed the action against all defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This dismissal was filed by Jane Doe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA, and document number 15.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.