Documents tagged "County"
Found 21 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00006693.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a gray background and various texts and fields that are partially obscured by the watermarked letters "IM" repeating throughout the page. The visible texts include place names like "Minnesota County" and possibly other words or phrases, but they are cut off or obscured, making it difficult to read the content accurately. The style of the image suggests it could be a standard office document or form, but without clearer text or more context, it's challenging to provide further details.
DOJ-OGR-00006426.jpg
The image is a document with visible text that appears to be related to a court proceeding, specifically a "JUDGMENT STATEMENT" from the District Court for Maricopa County in Arizona. The names and specific details are redacted, but there are references to defendants, plaintiffs, and case numbers. There's mention of a jury trial resulting in a verdict, as well as monetary awards or judgements for certain parties involved in the case. The document has been altered with redacted information to prevent identification.
DOJ-OGR-00026603.jpg
The image is a scanned document from the Saint Louis County Department of Revenue. It contains various sections such as 'Date' and 'License #'. The most prominent section includes a list with headings like 'Address', 'Make/Model', 'VIN', and 'Fee Due' along with corresponding columns for entry. The document appears to be a form or application related to vehicle registration or taxation, and it has been processed by the department as indicated by their stamp at the bottom right corner.
DOJ-OGR-00023000.jpg
The image displays the cover page of a report from the Department of Justice. At the top of the page, there is a logo consisting of an eagle and the American flag. The title "OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY" is prominently displayed in bold lettering. Below this, the document's subject matter is identified as an "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT". Further text indicates that it pertains to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for the year 2016-2017. The document is dated November 2018. There are no visible people or locations within this image; the focus is on the textual information and the logos related to the United States government agencies involved.
DOJ-OGR-00021877.jpg
The image is a scanned document titled "MANDATE" at the top. The document appears to be an official court mandate with sections filled out for a case that involves a defendant named John Doe and a prosecutor. It references criminal cases in New York City, specifically District Attorney's Office, Bronx County, Criminal Court. There are two signatures at the bottom of the page, one appearing to be from "Honorable John J. Walsh" and another by an individual whose name is partially obscured, indicating their status as a peace officer or similar official role. The document includes various lines with checkmarks next to each item, suggesting that certain options have been selected. There are also barcodes and handwritten annotations on the document.
DOJ-OGR-00021703.jpg
The image appears to be a digital photograph of a printed document. The document has a header with the word "Page" followed by a number "15" and below that, there is a reference to "County Library and Museum Board Minutes December 8, 2009". This suggests that the document contains minutes from a meeting of a county library and museum board, dated December 8, 2009. The text within the image is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be structured with headings and possibly paragraphs or bullet points related to the topics discussed at the meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00021523.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of an official document, specifically what seems to be a letter or notice from the office of a public official. The document is dated October 2018 and includes signatures at the bottom. There are references to "Florida State Attorney's Office" and "Palm Beach County," suggesting that this document is related to legal proceedings in Palm Beach County, Florida. The content of the text is not fully legible due to the image quality and angle, but it indicates a formal communication with a reference number, possibly indicating its file or case number.
DOJ-OGR-00031001.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper with printed text on it. At the top, there is a header that reads "Sarasota County Sheriff's Office" followed by a phone number. The central portion of the document has a bold title that states "Incident Report." Below this title is an area where personal information should be filled out, including name and address fields; however, these details are redacted with black lines. There is also some text in the lower half that appears to provide additional information about the incident report, but it is too small to read clearly. The paper has a white background with black ink used for printing.
DOJ-OGR-00008673.jpg
The image is a screenshot of a document, specifically page 257 from the record of proceedings for a court case involving Darrin Robert White and the County of Los Angeles. The document contains several lines of text detailing legal matters related to the case. It appears to be an official document with a formal structure and layout typical of legal records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033218.txt
The document discusses a visit by President Trump to Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach and its impact on air travel. Flight restrictions will be in place when the President is in town, and there will be designated gateway airports for arrivals and departures. The document also mentions specific dates and times of the visit as well as information about TSA-designated gateways at different airports.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031533.txt
The explosion centered around Baylor University's football program and its handling of a rape trial involving a former player, Sam Ukwuachu. The trial sparked controversy and criticism about the university's culture towards sexual assault, leading to scrutiny from Texas Monthly and other media outlets. This led to a crisis for the school, particularly for Coach Art Briles and Drayton McLane Jr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt
This document discusses a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and his connection to high-level politicians. The writer suggests that there may be an opportunity to use Epstein's relationship with former President Clinton as a way to attack the Trump administration, specifically Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta who was involved in the case. They argue that the federal government overstepped its bounds by intruding into what should have been a local matter and criticize the current backlash against those who made decisions at the time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt
This document is an email conversation between multiple people regarding Jeffrey Epstein and a deal he made with the federal government for a previous case. The participants include Matthew Hiltzik, Michael Wolff, J (possibly Jeffrey Epstein himself), and Ken Starr. The topic of discussion centers around the public's perception of Epstein's connection to high-ranking politicians and how it might affect the narrative surrounding his case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt
The email conversation discusses a possible line in an article that acknowledges Jeffrey Epstein's wrongdoing and mentions his connection to the Clintons. It also refers to his association with the Trump administration official who dealt with the case. The discussion highlights Epstein's role as a friend of former President Clinton and points out that he is connected to high levels of federal government, which could lead to anger surrounding the former president. Additionally, it references Ken Starr's critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting that his offense was quintessentially local in nature but treated as a state offense by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030105.txt
This document discusses the outcome of a court case involving Farooq Bajwa, an Orange County entrepreneur who sued Emirates NBD, one of the Middle East's most prominent banks. A federal jury found that the bank did not commit fraud or steal technology from Mr. Bajwa's company InfoSpan, which had claimed damages of half a billion dollars. The case was widely reported on by the media and has implications for business partnerships in the tech sector.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030101.txt
The document is an email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. regarding a press report about a federal jury's decision on a case involving Middle East bank and Orange County entrepreneur Farooq Bajwa. The LA Times was the first to report on the verdict, which was decided in favor of the bank. The bank has been accused of stealing technology from Irvine firm after their partnership collapsed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030098.txt
The document is about a federal jury decision regarding a Middle East bank and an Orange County entrepreneur. The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. A federal jury decided that the Emirates NBD did not commit fraud or steal technology from InfoSpan, an Irvine firm. This case involved millions of dollars in damages and ended with a partnership collapse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.txt
The document discusses Jeffrey Epstein, a former Palm Beach resident who pleaded guilty in 2008 to two prostitution-related charges involving underage girls. It is revealed that Epstein paid three women $5.5 million to settle lawsuits related to the underage-sex allegations. The settlements were reached after years of speculation about the amount Epstein paid to his accusers. Attorneys Bradley Edwards and Jack Scarola are also mentioned in the document as representing some of the young women who sued Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026005.txt
A federal jury decided that one of the Middle East's most prominent banks did not commit fraud and steal technology from an Irvine firm. The Dubai-based bank argued it cancelled a partnership because the Orange County company couldn't produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an established company, not one with little to no track record. The jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and theft of trade secrets. High-profile attorneys on both sides argued in this two-week trial that involved dueling accusations of fraud levied by high-profile attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt
In this email, Anne Boyles is informed about items for the August 11 Town Council Meeting by Kathleen Ruderman. Among the approved items are SPR 14-2007 and 5-2008, as well as an item on infrastructure of large homes. However, an appeal by Brindell regarding 144 Wells Road should not be included in the agenda. There are also two additional items to be added: EAR Amendments and Zoning Study Items.