Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Likewise"

Found 5 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt

This document discusses a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and his connection to high-level politicians. The writer suggests that there may be an opportunity to use Epstein's relationship with former President Clinton as a way to attack the Trump administration, specifically Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta who was involved in the case. They argue that the federal government overstepped its bounds by intruding into what should have been a local matter and criticize the current backlash against those who made decisions at the time.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt

This document is an email conversation between multiple people regarding Jeffrey Epstein and a deal he made with the federal government for a previous case. The participants include Matthew Hiltzik, Michael Wolff, J (possibly Jeffrey Epstein himself), and Ken Starr. The topic of discussion centers around the public's perception of Epstein's connection to high-ranking politicians and how it might affect the narrative surrounding his case.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt

The email conversation discusses a possible line in an article that acknowledges Jeffrey Epstein's wrongdoing and mentions his connection to the Clintons. It also refers to his association with the Trump administration official who dealt with the case. The discussion highlights Epstein's role as a friend of former President Clinton and points out that he is connected to high levels of federal government, which could lead to anger surrounding the former president. Additionally, it references Ken Starr's critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting that his offense was quintessentially local in nature but treated as a state offense by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt

The document discusses whether it is possible for a sitting president to be indicted in the United States. It points out that there have been six instances where this question has been addressed through internal memos and briefs filed in litigation, and the government's position on the matter is not as clear-cut as often presented. The most recent opinion on the matter came from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in 2000, but it is not binding on state prosecutors. The document argues that these issues are not foreclosed and highlights the complexity of criminal proceedings against presidents and vice presidents.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029448.txt

This document discusses the concept of self-deception and its potential impact on leaders like President Barack Obama. It highlights that even intelligent individuals can fall prey to self-deception, which can have far-reaching consequences. The author points out two mistakes made by Obama in his early presidency, one with immediate negative effects and another that took eight years to mature. The text emphasizes the importance of recognizing and overcoming self-deception to make sound decisions as a leader.