Documents tagged "Moreover"
Found 7 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031736.txt
The author expresses concern about an American president visiting Saudi Arabia for a summit meeting with Arab and Islamic state leaders, suggesting that this is not appropriate unless the president holds a high-ranking position such as Caliph. The author also criticizes the lack of transparency and potential exploitation by the United States regarding its relationship with Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the author raises concerns about the new Caliph's intentions towards Israel, indicating that he wants to empower it more and potentially leave Arab lands behind.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt
This document discusses a statement made by Jeffrey Epstein regarding his conviction for soliciting underage girls for prostitution. The conversation involves Lawrence Krauss and Rebecca Watson who are providing feedback on the statement. It seems that Epstein is being portrayed as an easy target and that there may be no clear victims in this case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030895.txt
The document discusses a statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein's actions and the aftermath. Lawrence Krauss expresses his belief that everyone involved was a victim and states that there was no happy resolution or consequences for these activities. He also believes that Jeffrey Epstein is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him, but has served time in prison for something determined as inappropriate. It's unclear if the masseuses were truly victims or not since they may have been aware of what they were doing and already participating in similar activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt
The document discusses whether it is possible for a sitting president to be indicted in the United States. It points out that there have been six instances where this question has been addressed through internal memos and briefs filed in litigation, and the government's position on the matter is not as clear-cut as often presented. The most recent opinion on the matter came from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in 2000, but it is not binding on state prosecutors. The document argues that these issues are not foreclosed and highlights the complexity of criminal proceedings against presidents and vice presidents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt
This document discusses the U.S.-Iranian diplomatic relationship regarding their nuclear program. The author argues that offering a final nuclear agreement to Iran is not the best strategy as it fails to recognize the complexity and multifaceted nature of the Iranian nuclear program, which requires piecemeal negotiations and incremental progress. Additionally, the author notes that if the U.S. were to offer Iran a final deal, Tehran has the right to contest and negotiate its provisions, and the international community is unlikely to support further sanctions or military action until Iran's objections are taken into account.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025978.txt
The document discusses risk parity funds and the potential risks associated with them, specifically in relation to bond-equity correlation. It provides a scenario tool for investors to assess what relative moves in bonds and equities could catalyze significant deleveraging by rules-based risk parity funds running vol target overlays. The document also suggests buying seasonal oil dips via bullish X-market risk reversals, leveraging both commodity strategists' 'buy the dip' view and equity strategists' bullish outlook on the Oil & Gas sector.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.