Documents tagged "Indeed"
Found 7 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028965.txt
The document is a letter from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to John Zucker, Assistant Legal Counsel for ABC's Office of Legal Counsel, regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The lawyer represents Jeffrey Epstein and believes that the airing of the interview will be grossly negligent or worse because the accusations made by Jane Doe 3 are uncorroborated, have been refuted by other credible evidence, and were previously considered immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in a pending litigation. The lawyer also mentions that Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with an FBI investigation into Mr. Epstein eight years ago.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028928.txt
The document is a letter from Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. to John Zucker of the Office of Legal Counsel regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The author represents Jeffrey Epstein and expresses concern about the potential broadcast of accusations made by Jane Doe 3, who is known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 Weinberg argues that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations would be grossly negligent or worse, as they are uncorroborated allegations from over a decade ago that have been refuted by other evidence and were deemed immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in ongoing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026650.txt
The email discusses the influence of private equity (P-E) in the incoming administration. Key people include Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman, and attorney Jay Clayton who will lead the SEC. The president-elect has also met with heads of other P-E firms such as Carlyle Group and KKR. A major focus for P-E is carried interest taxation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025978.txt
The document discusses risk parity funds and the potential risks associated with them, specifically in relation to bond-equity correlation. It provides a scenario tool for investors to assess what relative moves in bonds and equities could catalyze significant deleveraging by rules-based risk parity funds running vol target overlays. The document also suggests buying seasonal oil dips via bullish X-market risk reversals, leveraging both commodity strategists' 'buy the dip' view and equity strategists' bullish outlook on the Oil & Gas sector.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.txt
The document is a response from Virginia Giuffre in a court case where Alan Dershowitz has asked for clarification or relief from a confidentiality order regarding her deposition. The deposition contains sensitive information about Giuffre's experiences as a minor victim of sexual trafficking, and she supports the confidential nature of the deposition being provided to law enforcement to investigate the crimes committed against her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014084.txt
The document is related to a court case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 who are filing a response in opposition to a motion for leave to file a supplement to a reply in support of a motion for limited intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs claim that an affidavit submitted by Jane Doe #3 in support of an unrelated pleading does not prove anything against them, and accuse Dershowitz of hiding the truth about his activities. They also point out that Dershowitz has failed to provide specific evidence to contest Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite claiming in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations are false.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.