Documents tagged "Rather"
Found 9 documents with this tag
EFTA00004800-p-06.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document with multiple pages stapled together. The focus is on the content of the document rather than its surroundings. There are several pictures and sections of blacked-out text within the document, suggesting that it might contain sensitive or private information that has been redacted for privacy. The style of the image is realistic and documentary, capturing a physical object with an emphasis on textual details that have been intentionally obscured.
EFTA00003951-p-42.jpg
The image you've provided is not of a real object or scene, but rather it appears to be a blacked out rectangle with a white border. This kind of image might typically represent an area that has been censored in order to protect sensitive information or privacy, such as in the context of redacted documents. There is no visible text, people, locations, or significant objects discernible within this blackened area, as it's entirely obscured by a solid color.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033587.txt
The message involves an investigative reporter from Fox News who is seeking to contact Jeffrey Epstein through his attorney Martin Weinberg. The reporter wants to inquire about Epstein's ties with both the Clintons and Donald Trump. This communication takes place between two individuals, one being a journalist and the other being a lawyer, reflecting their professional roles in this situation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt
This document contains a series of emails between an investigative reporter at Fox News and Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. The reporter is interested in speaking with Epstein about his ties to the Clintons and Donald Trump and is trying to arrange a phone interview or email exchange through Weinberg.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt
The document appears to be a forwarded message between Martin Weinberg and Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. The sender, an investigative reporter for Fox News, is requesting information about Epstein's ties to the Clintons and Donald Trump. They are hoping to arrange a call or email exchange with Epstein through his attorney.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt
The document is an email exchange between Alan Dershowitz and Malia Zimmerman of FoxNews.com regarding a media inquiry about Jeffrey Epstein's involvement with the Clinton Global Initiative. The email contains attachments, including a screenshot of a passage related to the topic.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029234.txt
The document discusses a conversation between Jeffrey E. and Lawrence Krauss about an article they both read, which argues against fanaticism. They also discuss the role of religion in people's lives and how fanaticism can be dangerous regardless of whether it is religious or secular. Noam Chomsky is also mentioned as someone who agrees with Krauss on this point but differs on some other topics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028931.txt
The document is an email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss discussing the dangers of secular religions like nationalist fanaticism compared to astrology. They also discuss how irrational beliefs should be confronted with argument and evidence while treating the believers respectfully, even if it's challenging at times.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.