Documents tagged "Research"
Found 59 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00006879.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with text, possibly from an official report or publication. The top portion of the text includes what appears to be a title and a date, but it's partially obscured by the camera flash reflection on the surface. The visible text also mentions "Fundamental Research" in one part, suggesting that the content relates to research activities or funding. There are no people or other significant objects visible within the image. The style of the document seems formal and academic.
DOJ-OGR-00006861.jpg
The image shows a printed document with a title at the top that reads "Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: Delays, Non-Disclosure and Partial Disclosure - What the Research Tells Us and Implications for Practice." The text is in black ink on white paper. It appears to be an academic or professional paper, as indicated by its formal language and structure. There are no people visible in the image; it focuses solely on the document.
DOJ-OGR-00006723.jpg
The image you've provided is a photograph of printed text that appears to be a document page from a report or an article. Due to the quality and angle of the photo, it is challenging to read all the details, but I can observe that there are several paragraphs with headings and subheadings. The visible text includes phrases like "Fundamental Research" and "Advanced Technology Development," suggesting that the document may be related to research activities or technological advancements. The page also contains tables and lists, indicating a structured presentation of information.
DOJ-OGR-00005936.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with text on it. The title of the document reads "Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: Delays, Non-Disclosure and Partial Disclosure - What the Research Tells Us and Implications for Practice". Below the title are two paragraphs of text that appear to be an introduction or summary, but the details of their content are not clear due to the resolution and angle of the photograph. The document seems to be a professional paper or report focusing on the issue of child sexual abuse disclosures and its implications in practical settings.
DOJ-OGR-00002554.jpg
The image displays a document, presumably of an official or legal nature, with various sections and paragraphs numbered from "I" to "XVI." The section at the top is labeled as "XV" and deals with "Disclaimer Clause in Research Agreements." This indicates that the content is related to contractual matters involving research. However, due to the image's resolution and size, specific details such as names or sensitive information are not clear enough to be transcribed accurately. The document is structured like a formal legal text with headings, subheadings, and numbered paragraphs, suggesting it is intended for professional use in a business or government context.
DOJ-OGR-00025756.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of an electronic document, possibly an email printout. The visible content includes a header with the sender's name and address, "Rep James Pence" from "Pence@pence.in". There are also red annotations pointing out certain parts of the text: one annotation highlights the name "Dr. Pence" in the body of the message, suggesting it may be significant to whoever made the annotations. The text is too small and blurred for a detailed read, but there's mention of "University Research" and "Health Psychology", indicating that the email might be related to academic or medical research activities.
DOJ-OGR-00025586.jpg
The image is a scanned document with redacted text and signatures. It appears to be a letter or form of some kind, possibly related to research as indicated by the title "Research Ethics Review" at the top. The redacted sections suggest that personal information or sensitive content has been removed for privacy reasons. The layout includes lines for recipients' names and addresses, followed by a body of text which is not fully visible due to redaction. There are also date fields labeled "Date" and "Subject," though these areas are blank in the image. The document is printed on standard white paper, and there are no visible images or graphics besides the text.
DOJ-OGR-00025563.jpg
The image shows a document with text that appears to be an official update related to research. The document is titled "Research Update" and includes a date of April 2013. It references a list of staff, one of whom has their name underlined, indicating they are no longer part of the team. Additionally, it mentions a location: "TNTH." At the bottom of the image, there is a signature in black ink, presumably from the person who authored or approved the document. The style of the image suggests it's a scanned copy of a printed document, with some marks and stains on the paper that are visible due to the scanning process.
DOJ-OGR-00025536.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "Research Observation Dates" at the top. It appears to be a table that includes fields such as "Dates" and "Observations". There is also visible text indicating "To: TNG", which could suggest an address or recipient of this document. The specific contents within the cells are not clear due to the image's resolution and quality. The background is plain, with no additional context or people visible in the frame.
DOJ-OGR-00025535.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with some redacted areas where text has been obscured for privacy. The document is titled "Scientific Research Update" and includes a date at the top right corner that seems to say "2015-07-08". There is also an address section, likely intended for sending mail, but it is not filled out in this instance. The overall style of the image is informational, resembling an official or professional document.
DOJ-OGR-00008725.jpg
The image is a document containing text with an overlaid watermark. The text appears to be from the "Institute of Medicine Committee on Sleep Medicine and Research," as indicated by the header at the top of the page. The title of the section shown in the image reads "Sleep Disorders in Adults." There are numbered points listed under this section, suggesting a list or outline format, but the specific contents of these points are not fully visible due to the resolution and angle of the photo. The watermark across the text is a light gray color with some form of text repeated diagonally, possibly indicating copyright information or the name of the publishing entity. The document itself has a formal layout typical of official reports or academic publications.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033420.txt
The document discusses how a potential recession and increasing regulatory threats could increase pressure on Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon in 2019. The slowing economy may lead to people looking for scapegoats, which could further fuel arguments that these tech giants are too big and need to be reined in. The document also mentions recent congressional hearings involving the CEOs of Google, Twitter, and Facebook and ongoing investigations into data privacy practices by the Federal Trade Commission.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033395.txt
The document discusses how a slowing economy and increasing regulatory threats could make it difficult for tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon in 2019. The biggest tech companies have already made billions of dollars in profits and benefited from major tax cuts, but next year is unlikely to be better financially for them. They have also been dogged by scandals that have left many questioning their positive role in society. If the economy starts to slip, 2019 could be worse for these companies. The document mentions Google CEO Sundar Pichai who has agreed to testify before Congress and lawmakers pushing for a federal privacy law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033220.txt
President Trump has promised to increase defense spending with support from key members of Congress. If a large multiyear plan is approved, it would represent a significant reversal from the weakest trend in defense spending in the past 50 years. The details of Trump's first Pentagon budget will form part of the overall budget he'll submit to Congress in late February or early March. The actual funding request for the current fiscal year must be completed by April 30, and Trump's blueprint for the Pentagon budget could set the baseline for defense spending for at least the next four years. Senator John McCain argues that the US has underinvested in the military for several years and calls for a $640 billion defense budget for fiscal year 2018, which is $58 billion above the current budget baseline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032992.txt
In this email exchange, Lawrence Krauss, director of The Origins Project at Arizona State University, expresses concern over President Trump's approach to science and space exploration. Jeffrey E. writes back, suggesting that Krauss's concerns are misplaced and that Trump will actually decimate climate change through his support for verifiable projects. The email also mentions a NASA bill aimed at landing on Mars.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032812.txt
The document is an email from Lawrence Krauss to Jeffrey E. regarding the investigation of Rubenfeld at Yale for conduct with female law students. The investigation was initiated before Kavanaugh's nomination to the high court and focused on his conduct, particularly with female law students. Rubenfeld stated that he did not know what he is alleged to have said or done and that the allegations were not of the kind that would jeopardize his position as a long-tenured member of the faculty. The email emphasizes the confidential and privileged nature of the information contained within.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032716.txt
The document shows a series of email exchanges between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E. The conversation revolves around the topic of publishing trash, with Krauss seeking advice from Jeffrey on how to handle this situation. The email thread indicates that Krauss has cancelled his flight to Chile and is now in Portland. At one point, Jeffrey suggests that Krauss should distinguish himself from Trump. It seems like there's a sense of urgency or concern in the conversation, as Lawrence mentions that he needs Jeffrey's feedback on the letter and that they are contacting students and postdocs. The email chain also includes attachments such as an image named "image002.png".
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt
Lawrence Krauss, a professor at Arizona State University, wrote to Jeffrey E. expressing concern about the impact of Trump's budget cuts on science and human space exploration. He mentioned that the proposed cuts will decimate real science, particularly particle physics, and end funding for him personally. He also criticized Trump's focus on big and showy projects like rocket size rather than supporting science itself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032520.txt
The document is a series of emails between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E. discussing politics and science. Lawrence Krauss expresses his disappointment with the current administration's approach to supporting science, stating that it is all about "the size of the rocket" rather than contributing to scientific progress. He also mentions that he is the Director of The Origins Project at ASU and a Foundation Professor in the School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department. Jeffrey E. shares an article from The Washington Post regarding NASA's budget and its aim to land on Mars, but Lawrence Krauss responds with further criticism of the administration's policies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt
Lawrence Krauss is the Director of The Origins Project at Arizona State University and a Foundation Professor in the School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department. He expressed concerns about President Trump's focus on space exploration, stating that it was not contributing to science but rather serving as an opportunity for glory. In response, Jeffrey E. sent Krauss an article from The Washington Post about President Trump signing a NASA bill aimed at landing on Mars.