Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Protect"

Found 3 documents with this tag

EFTA00004663-p-045.jpg

The image displays a plastic sleeve containing what appears to be a document with some information obscured by black rectangles, likely to protect personal data or sensitive information from being read in this context. The background is neutral and nondescript, allowing the focus on the document within the sleeve. There are no visible texts, people, locations, or significant objects that can be described beyond what has been obscured by the black rectangles.

EFTA00004477-p-039.jpg

The image shows a document with several sections of blacked out information, presumably to protect sensitive data. The visible parts include words like "TOP SECRET" and "NATO FORCE COMMANDER" at the top, suggesting that this could be a military or national security-related paper. There are lines on the right side that are cut off by the frame of the image, indicating it may have been cropped for the photograph. The document is partially obscured by plastic, which also has some blacked out sections, reinforcing the need for secrecy around this information.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt

The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.