Documents tagged "Bradley"
Found 10 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
The document is an email conversation between a certified paralegal and others, discussing the service of papers to individuals named Maxwell, Wexner, and Trump. The focus is on whether these individuals have been personally served or if it was someone at their location who accepted the papers on their behalf. The context of the emails suggests that this relates to a legal matter involving Jane Doe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030624.txt
The document discusses a request from The Mail on Sunday for comment regarding an article about Mr Bradley Edwards' claim against Mr Jeffrey Epstein. The topic of the article includes allegations made by Virginia Roberts and other young women who say they were underage victims of Mr Epstein, as well as claims that Mr Epstein attempted to intimidate Mr Edwards and his clients into retracting their claims. Additionally, it is mentioned that Virginia Roberts has stated her intention to testify about a sexual encounter with Prince Andrew at the age of 17, and that she was flown to London for this purpose. The article also mentions an address book containing contact information for several men who Ms Roberts says were involved in sex trafficking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030622.txt
The document is an email chain discussing a request from The Mail on Sunday for comment regarding a case involving Mr Bradley Edwards and Mr Jeffrey Epstein. It mentions the involvement of young women who allege they were underage when their encounters with Epstein took place, as well as claims by one woman that she was instructed to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17. The article also references an address book containing contact information for other men involved in Epstein's alleged sex trafficking ring.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030620.txt
Jeffrey Epstein is the subject of an article in The Mail on Sunday regarding a lawsuit filed by Bradley Edwards against him for allegedly intimidating witnesses and attempting to intimidate his clients into retracting their claims. The witness list includes several young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr. Epstein. One of the witnesses intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr. Epstein and instructed to have sex with Prince Andrew, and another witness claims to have been flown to a dinner for President Clinton along with two other young women. The deadline for comment on this matter is noon ET Saturday.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030618.txt
The document discusses a legal case involving Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein, with allegations of sexual abuse and intimidation against underage women. There is also mention of Prince Andrew's involvement in the case. The case has been scheduled for a jury trial, and there are witnesses listed who claim to be victims of Epstein's actions. Additionally, it is mentioned that Mr Edwards had contact information of other men from an address book belonging to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029315.txt
This document lists the names and contact information of attorneys at the law firm MPanish in West Palm Beach, Florida. The attorneys are organized alphabetically by last name and include partners, shareholders, paralegals, and other legal professionals from various states and jurisdictions. It also includes a letter that discusses a case involving Bradley Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021824.txt
This document is a rough draft transcript of the deposition in the case of Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz. The key people involved are the attorneys for the parties, including Jack Scarola representing Edwards and Cassell, Sigrid McCawley representing Virginia Roberts from Boies Schiller & Flexner, and Joni Jones from the Utah Attorney General's Office. The deposition is being held at a location in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on October 16th, 2015.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014037.txt
The article discusses whether crime victims should have rights during criminal investigations, focusing on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and its applicability before criminal charges are filed. The authors argue that if victims do not have rights during investigations, many will never receive any protection or support from the legal system. They also address a recent memorandum by the Justice Department contending that the CVRA does not extend rights to crime victims until formal charges are filed. The article is published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, with authors Paul G. Cassell, Nathanael J. Mitchell, and Bradley J. Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.