HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021824.txt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021824.txt
Why This Matters
This document is a rough draft transcript of the deposition in the case of Bradley J.
AI-Generated Summary
This document is a rough draft transcript of the deposition in the case of Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz. The key people involved are the attorneys for the parties, including Jack Scarola representing Edwards and Cassell, Sigrid McCawley representing Virginia Roberts from Boies Schiller & Flexner, and Joni Jones from the Utah Attorney General's Office. The deposition is being held at a location in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on October 16th, 2015.
Document Content
File Type: TXT
View FileRelated Documents
EFTA00009116-p-072.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes with numbered points. The first point is about the lack of support for an issue and mentions that it has been raised before. The second point discusses how a conversation is necessary to resolve the situation because it affects many people. There's a reference to a "Friday 26th" meeting in which it was decided that the person writing these notes will be responsible for handling the matter, as well as an indication that they learned about this responsibility at that meeting. The third point discusses how there has been no progress or action despite promises made at previous meetings. The fourth point mentions that this is a critical issue and must be addressed immediately. There's also mention of "The New Beach Policy" which may be the subject matter of these notes. The final point states that the person writing the notes will discuss this with someone on Monday, and there are instructions to contact them immediately if they don't receive an update by that time.
EFTA00009116-p-053.jpg
The image shows a page from what appears to be an official document or report, possibly related to legal proceedings given the context provided by some of the texts. The page is numbered "Page 25" at the top right corner. The text on the page includes bullet points with questions and answers that seem to be part of a formal interview or deposition session. The visible text includes phrases such as "What time did you leave for the airport?," "How long have you known so-and-so?," "What happened when you arrived at the restaurant?," and so on. The questions are followed by answers which are not fully visible in the image provided. There is also a note or comment at the bottom of the page that says "What's the big deal here? I don't see anything in the record about what happened to make you so upset." This statement suggests a line of questioning focused on understanding the emotional state of an individual involved in the proceedings. The image is a photograph or scan, and its quality is not high, with some text being obscured by shadows and distortions typical of photocopies or scans that are not optimally lit or aligned for clarity.
EFTA00009016-p-084.jpg
The image is a photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The paper appears to be a lined notepad with the top left corner folded over as if it were taken from a notebook or legal pad. The text is a list of questions and answers related to a topic that seems to involve a personal injury case. The questions are posed in blue ink, and the responses follow underneath them. There are 19 numbered entries, indicating a structured interview or questionnaire format. A significant portion of the text is obscured by the angle at which the image was taken, but the visible parts include phrases like "case", "truck", "right side", "not hurt as bad as I thought", and a few more pieces of information related to personal injuries and legal matters. The overall style of the document suggests it might be from an interview or deposition in a legal proceeding.
EFTA00009016-p-047.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper with the title "Page 26" at the top. The writing appears to be an interview transcript, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: How long have you lived here? A: Since I was born." and questions related to work experience, personal experiences, and other life-related topics. The handwriting is neat, with some words crossed out or altered. There are no visible texts apart from the interview transcript and page number. No people, locations, or significant objects other than the text are discernible in this image.
EFTA00009016-p-028.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a focus on questions and answers related to a legal case or investigation. The text is printed over a background that resembles lined paper typically used for notetaking. Due to the resolution, some words are not clearly legible, but one can discern phrases such as "question", "answer", and what seems to be a series of questions likely posed during an interview or deposition. The document has been numbered at the bottom left corner with '27', indicating that this is page 27 from a larger set.