Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Hill"

Found 5 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt

A man who attended military school with Donald Trump came out in his defense and shared a bombshell truth about him. However, the author of this information failed to mention that Peter Ticktin's law license has been suspended twice for unethical practice of law. This makes him an unfit character witness for Trump. The man who lived with Trump 50 years ago also drops another bomb on him.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030967.txt

In the email exchange between J and Steve Bannon, J expresses dissatisfaction with Powell's statement during a press conference regarding interest rates and past economic data. J suggests that the numbers used to make decisions are not relevant to today's economy due to technological advancements. The discussion revolves around Trump considering firing Fed Chief Powell after the latest interest rate hike, as reported by The Hill.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028965.txt

The document is a letter from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to John Zucker, Assistant Legal Counsel for ABC's Office of Legal Counsel, regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The lawyer represents Jeffrey Epstein and believes that the airing of the interview will be grossly negligent or worse because the accusations made by Jane Doe 3 are uncorroborated, have been refuted by other credible evidence, and were previously considered immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in a pending litigation. The lawyer also mentions that Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with an FBI investigation into Mr. Epstein eight years ago.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028928.txt

The document is a letter from Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. to John Zucker of the Office of Legal Counsel regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The author represents Jeffrey Epstein and expresses concern about the potential broadcast of accusations made by Jane Doe 3, who is known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 Weinberg argues that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations would be grossly negligent or worse, as they are uncorroborated allegations from over a decade ago that have been refuted by other evidence and were deemed immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in ongoing litigation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt

The document discusses an incident in which a female aide to a Republican senator leaked the Anita Hill affidavit, revealing a conversation among Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson. The three men were discussing charges brought by Anita Hill that had been ignored by the Judiciary Committee. In this conversation, they jokingly acknowledged the truth of Professor Hill's allegations.