Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Federal Rules"

Found 13 documents with this tag

DOJ-OGR-00006754.jpg

The image shows a page of a legal document, possibly a court transcript or a section from a case file. The text on the document is dense and discusses matters related to evidence and testimony in a legal context. It mentions concepts such as "relevance", "admissibility", and references to specific laws or regulations, like "Federal Rules of Evidence". There are no visible people or locations on this page, and it appears to be a formal, professional document intended for legal proceedings or review. The text is black on a white background, with the text size varying but generally small, indicative of official documents meant for careful reading.

DOJ-OGR-00006349.jpg

The image displays a printed document with numerous lines of text. The font is standard, and the print quality appears to be good. At the top left corner, there's a footer with text that includes a date, page number, and possibly some reference or case number: "December 2013, Page 47, 64819/2013." The visible content of the document seems to relate to legal matters as indicated by the text which references court cases and statutes such as "Rule 15(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." The overall style of the image is informational and formal.

DOJ-OGR-00026704.jpg

The image displays a form with multiple sections of printed text and checkboxes. It appears to be an official document from the Department of Justice, specifically related to "Federal Rules of Procedure" based on the visible text at the top left corner. The form includes fields for personal information such as name, address, and contact details, as well as spaces for signatures. There are also sections with checkboxes that seem to pertain to legal matters, possibly indicating options for legal representation or other procedural decisions. Some of the boxes have been checked, but due to the resolution, it's difficult to read the specific choices made on this form. The background is plain and white, which contrasts with the black text, making it clear that this document is intended for serious legal purposes.

DOJ-OGR-00021463.jpg

The image shows a document with various texts on it. It appears to be a legal or official notice due to the formal language and layout. The visible text mentions "AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS" and refers to sections of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The document is titled with "NOTICE OF AMENDED ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE," and it includes page numbers indicating that this is a multi-page document. There are redacted areas within the text, suggesting sensitive or confidential information has been obscured for privacy. The overall style of the image is formal and informational, typical of legal notices or court documents.

DOJ-OGR-00021108.jpg

The image is of a document with printed text and handwritten notes on it. The top right corner has a red stamp that reads "DRAFT" and below it, the date "December 2017" is written in blue ink. The text includes references to sections of laws such as "8 U.S.C. ยง 1158(b)(6)" and mentions "Federal Rules of Evidence." Handwritten notes are visible on the left side, with phrases like "cannot do that" and "is not relevant here," suggesting someone's annotations or commentary regarding the content of the document. The overall appearance of the image is formal and suggests a legal or official context.

DOJ-OGR-00020612.jpg

The image is a scanned document titled "Case No: 1:02-cv-05650" with the word "DISTRICT COURT" above it. The document appears to be a legal filing or court order, featuring numbered paragraphs and redacted text, indicating sensitive information has been obscured. The visible part of the first paragraph mentions "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" and refers to "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment." The case number is repeated at the top right corner with a barcode underneath.

DOJ-OGR-00002865.jpg

The image is a scanned document with a header that includes the address "105 W. B Street" and appears to be a page from an official court case file or legal report. The body of the text is focused on discussing the admissibility of expert testimony in court, specifically referring to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. It mentions that the witness's proposed opinion would not assist the trier of fact, and therefore it should be excluded from the trial. There are signatures at the bottom of the document, indicating approval or validation by authorized parties. The style of the image is typical for legal documents, with formal text and professional layout.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt

The document is an email notification regarding a notice of voluntary dismissal in case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA "Doe v. Trump et al" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, has voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit against all defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that this case involves some sort of controversy or conflict involving Donald Trump and/or his associates, but the specific details are not provided in this summary.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt

This document discusses a legal case involving the dismissal of charges against a plaintiff named Jane Doe against defendants including Donald Trump. The case is titled "Doe v. Trump et al" and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York under case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA. The court documents indicate that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the charges against all defendants. The document is marked "Privileged - Redacted" and includes instructions for public access users regarding downloading copies of documents for free or at a fee.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt

The document discusses a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case filed against Donald Trump and others. The plaintiff(s) have dismissed the action against all defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This dismissal was filed by Jane Doe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA, and document number 15.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt

The document discusses a legal case involving Jane Doe and Donald Trump, among others. The case was voluntarily dismissed against all defendants according to a notice of voluntary dismissal filed by Meagher, Thomas on November 4th, 2016. The communication is confidential and intended only for the addressee, with unauthorized use or disclosure being strictly prohibited.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714.txt

This document discusses proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The author, Paul G. Cassell, a law professor at the University of Utah and a federal district court judge, argues that crime victims should be more fully recognized within these rules. He suggests several specific changes to ensure that victims are treated with fairness and respect throughout the criminal justice process.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635.txt

The article discusses the importance of treating crime victims fairly in the criminal process by integrating them into federal rules of procedure. The author argues that current proposed amendments to these rules are inadequate and recommends broader measures for fully protecting crime victims' rights. The focus is on the Sixth Amendment and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and how they relate to victim participation in the legal system.