Documents tagged "Salman"
Found 8 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032989.txt
The document is an email exchange between two people discussing a third person named Masa, who is facing resistance due to controversy. The sender suggests contacting Nathan Myhrvold or bin Salman as potential sources of information on Masa. The recipient is Landon Thomas Jr., a financial reporter for the New York Times.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032643.txt
The document discusses a scandal involving US President Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman. The author refers to tweets from the famous Saudi opposition figure @mujtahidd which suggest that there is evidence of the US supporting MBS over his rival, Mohammad bin Nayef (MBN) after Trump's visit to SA. The author also mentions that past US administrations avoided strife within GCC due to America's interests being upheld with a harmonious GCC. However, this changed under Trump's administration. The document also refers to a private yacht and several boxes of cash ($1bn USD) which were discreetly delivered during Trump's visit to SA in May 2017.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031684.txt
This email discusses the provenance of Salvator Mundi, a painting by Leonardo da Vinci that is the last known in private hands. In 2013, Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev purchased the painting for $127 million through his art dealer, Swiss businessman Yves Bouvier. Before Bouvier, the painting was owned by New York City-based gallerist Robert Simon, who found it at an estate auction in New Orleans in 2005 and paid just $10,000 for it. The email also mentions a conversation about Donald Trump overruling Congress on Yemen and the relationship between Rybolovlev and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt
The document appears to be an email conversation between J (jeevacation@gmail.com) and Michael Wolff regarding the possible involvement of MBS (Mohammad bin Salman, crown prince of Saudi Arabia) in a real estate transaction involving a Russian individual who sold him a painting for $450 million when it was only worth $1.5 million. The email also mentions that J's information may be confidential or attorney-client privileged and is intended only for the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt
The document discusses the relationship between President Trump and Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (MBS) in relation to Yemeni conflicts, as well as a potential financial link between them through an expensive art sale. The author suggests that there may be corruption or illegal activities involved in these dealings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030804.txt
The email discusses several topics including a Russian oligarch, Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman, journalists inquiring about Trump dealings, erotic massage by women for money, and concerns about receiving a congressional subpoena. The sender mentions the need for a team in place and suggests speaking to reporters with prepared responses. The information contained in the email is confidential and intended only for the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023644.txt
Prince Mohammed bin Salman is the Deputy Crown Prince and Chairman of the Council for Economic Affairs and Development. He discussed the national transformation program in a television interview on Saudi Arabia's first channel. The program aims to improve government agency performance, with indicators and targets currently applied to 24 agencies. New entities will be added in the near future. One year after the establishment of Vision 2030, Prince Mohammed bin Salman believes it has achieved many accomplishments, including reduced deficit rates and increased non-oil revenues. He also discussed unemployment and investment indexes, which were affected by previous oil price declines.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.txt
The U.S. Supreme Court has lowered the standard for proving insider trading involving tipping family or friends in the case of Salman v. U.S. The court held that a gift of inside information to a family or friend is sufficient to prove insider trading tipping liability, even if there is no valuable quid pro quo exchange. This narrows the previous requirement under Newman that required proof of pecuniary benefit or similarly valuable personal benefit. It will likely embolden the government to bring more similar cases as it becomes easier for them to prove a "gift" to a "friend" than a financial gain.