HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019088.txt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019088.txt
Why This Matters
In the late 1970s, the author was torn between their role as an underground abortion referral service and a stand-up satirist who performed jokes about rape.
AI-Generated Summary
In the late 1970s, the author was torn between their role as an underground abortion referral service and a stand-up satirist who performed jokes about rape. After Roe vs Wade legalized abortion, they believed it would never be made illegal again, but in 2012, they became disillusioned with the right-wing religious conservative movement's attempts to re-criminalize reproductive rights. The author eventually dropped a controversial joke that involved the "rape-in" of legislator's wives after receiving backlash from feminist friends. In July 2012, a woman who prefers to remain anonymous went to a comedy club and sparked widespread controversy by expressing her disapproval of rape jokes being performed at the venue.
Document Content
File Type: TXT
View FileRelated Documents
EFTA00020517-p-2.jpg
The image is a scanned document with numerous redacted sections, which means parts of the text have been deliberately obscured for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks are typically used to conceal sensitive information like names, addresses, and personal details from public view. As the content of the redacted areas has been intentionally hidden, it's not possible to provide specifics about the visible text or any people, locations, or significant objects within those sections. The document appears to be official in nature, possibly a legal or governmental record, given the formality and structure of the layout.
EFTA00009016-p-059.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with handwritten notes. The paper shows a list of questions labeled from "1" to "20" with answers underneath each question in another handwriting style. Some parts of the text are obscured by lines drawn through them, indicating they have been crossed out or are not to be used. There's a visible date at the bottom right corner of the page: "July 6th," which is partially cut off. The quality and angle of the photograph suggest it might have been taken casually without any professional intent.
EFTA00009016-p-018.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a printed page with a series of numbered questions and answers related to a legal or corporate matter. The content is not fully legible due to the resolution and angle of the photo. However, some visible text includes terms such as "questions", "answers", "agreement", and "disclosure", suggesting that the page is part of a document exchange during negotiations or an investigation. There are also references to specific dates in July and August, which could be related to events or deadlines mentioned in the context of the questions. The bottom right corner of the page includes what seems to be a handwritten note with a date, possibly indicating when this page was last reviewed or noted as important.
EFTA00008892-p-25.jpg
The image appears to be a photo of a document or printed material. The top part of the document contains text that reads "July 22, 2016 Deposition" suggesting this is related to a legal proceeding scheduled for July 22, 2016. There's also a redacted section that seems to contain personal information or sensitive details, as indicated by the black lines covering the content. The text is in English and is written in a standard font commonly used for formal documents. The background of the image shows some indistinct elements which do not provide clear additional context.
EFTA00008716-p-25.jpg
The image is a screenshot of a computer interface displaying what appears to be an official court document titled "July 29, 2016 Deposition." There's also a watermark at the bottom right that reads "U.S. Government Printing Office." The text and formatting suggest that this is likely related to legal proceedings in the United States government context.