DOJ-OGR-00025615.jpg
DOJ-OGR-00025615.jpg
Why This Matters
The image shows a document with several pieces of information redacted.
AI-Generated Summary
The image shows a document with several pieces of information redacted. The top part of the document is titled "Safety and Security Manual" with a subtitle that mentions "Correctional Facility". There are blanks where names should be, such as "Security Officer". The middle section of the document is obscured by redacted text, but there's a visible date "2016/17" followed by what appears to be a report on an incident involving a knife. The bottom part of the document includes more redacted information and a line for "Actions Taken" with two check boxes marked "No". The overall style of the image is a standard, formal-looking printed document.
Document Preview
Related Documents
EFTA00009116-p-090.jpg
The image displays a page with printed text that has been partially obscured by red lines, indicating sensitive information is being redacted. The content appears to be related to some sort of investigation or report. There's visible text at the top mentioning "Case Report" and further down there are sections like "Officer Observation" where parts have been blacked out. The style of the image suggests it could be a scanned document, possibly from an official or legal source.
EFTA00009016-p-096.jpg
The image displays a black and white document with printed text on lined paper. The text appears to be from a legal proceeding or testimony given under oath, as indicated by the phrase "Under Oath" near the top of the page. Below that heading are numbered paragraphs containing questions and answers. One question reads: "Q Did you ever have any discussions with Mr. Philips about whether it is really appropriate for someone in his position to be attending meetings at the home of a lobbyist? A No, not really." The document also contains handwritten annotations in blue ink. These annotations include underlining certain words and phrases, making corrections or additions, and crossing out some text. There's a checkmark next to one of the handwritten changes, which might indicate approval or agreement with the amendment. The quality of the image is not high-resolution, making it difficult to read all the fine details.
EFTA00009016-p-065.jpg
The image shows a page of text that appears to be a printed document or perhaps an old computer printout. The content is not clearly legible due to the quality and angle at which the photo was taken, making it difficult to discern specific words or phrases. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects apart from the printed text itself. The background is nondescript, focusing attention on the page of text in the center.
EFTA00009016-p-049.jpg
The image displays a handwritten list of questions on lined notebook paper with visible creases and scrawls that suggest it has been handled extensively. The text is difficult to decipher due to its informal writing style and the quality of the handwriting, but the phrases "What's their name?" and "No longer available" are discernible, suggesting inquiries about a person or status. The paper appears to be aged, possibly indicating it was used for note-taking or interview questions at some point in time.
EFTA00009016-p-047.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper with the title "Page 26" at the top. The writing appears to be an interview transcript, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: How long have you lived here? A: Since I was born." and questions related to work experience, personal experiences, and other life-related topics. The handwriting is neat, with some words crossed out or altered. There are no visible texts apart from the interview transcript and page number. No people, locations, or significant objects other than the text are discernible in this image.