HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025101.txt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025101.txt
Why This Matters
This is a conversation between Tom Pritzker and Jeffrey E.
AI-Generated Summary
This is a conversation between Tom Pritzker and Jeffrey E. about Comey's actions towards Clinton. They discuss the reasons for his actions, including an incident involving Marc Rich. It also mentions Barrack and a foundation that Denise needs to pledge $500K to. The exchange refers to other individuals such as Ehud and Edelman.
Document Content
File Type: TXT
View FileRelated Documents
EFTA00032998-p-5.jpg
The image shows a postcard that appears to be used for voting purposes. The postcard is addressed to "J. Epstein" and includes handwritten notes on the front side. There's also a stamp visible in the upper right corner with the words "Election Mail." The text on the postcard, partially obscured by handwriting, mentions "Important Election Reminders" and provides dates of "Nov 3, 2020" and "Dec 8, 2020." Additionally, there's a red stamp indicating that the postcard is to be sent "Return Service Requested." The handwriting includes some initials next to the name "J. Epstein" on the front of the postcard, possibly indicating the sender or recipient's confirmation.
EFTA00020517-p-2.jpg
The image is a scanned document with numerous redacted sections, which means parts of the text have been deliberately obscured for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks are typically used to conceal sensitive information like names, addresses, and personal details from public view. As the content of the redacted areas has been intentionally hidden, it's not possible to provide specifics about the visible text or any people, locations, or significant objects within those sections. The document appears to be official in nature, possibly a legal or governmental record, given the formality and structure of the layout.
EFTA00009116-p-072.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes with numbered points. The first point is about the lack of support for an issue and mentions that it has been raised before. The second point discusses how a conversation is necessary to resolve the situation because it affects many people. There's a reference to a "Friday 26th" meeting in which it was decided that the person writing these notes will be responsible for handling the matter, as well as an indication that they learned about this responsibility at that meeting. The third point discusses how there has been no progress or action despite promises made at previous meetings. The fourth point mentions that this is a critical issue and must be addressed immediately. There's also mention of "The New Beach Policy" which may be the subject matter of these notes. The final point states that the person writing the notes will discuss this with someone on Monday, and there are instructions to contact them immediately if they don't receive an update by that time.
EFTA00009016-p-096.jpg
The image displays a black and white document with printed text on lined paper. The text appears to be from a legal proceeding or testimony given under oath, as indicated by the phrase "Under Oath" near the top of the page. Below that heading are numbered paragraphs containing questions and answers. One question reads: "Q Did you ever have any discussions with Mr. Philips about whether it is really appropriate for someone in his position to be attending meetings at the home of a lobbyist? A No, not really." The document also contains handwritten annotations in blue ink. These annotations include underlining certain words and phrases, making corrections or additions, and crossing out some text. There's a checkmark next to one of the handwritten changes, which might indicate approval or agreement with the amendment. The quality of the image is not high-resolution, making it difficult to read all the fine details.
EFTA00009016-p-049.jpg
The image displays a handwritten list of questions on lined notebook paper with visible creases and scrawls that suggest it has been handled extensively. The text is difficult to decipher due to its informal writing style and the quality of the handwriting, but the phrases "What's their name?" and "No longer available" are discernible, suggesting inquiries about a person or status. The paper appears to be aged, possibly indicating it was used for note-taking or interview questions at some point in time.