Documents tagged "Am"
Found 31 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt
The document contains a series of emails discussing the possibility of a new baby and the sender's plans to bring a Burmese singer to the US after a visit from Obama. The sender also mentions that Iris was in Bangkok and suggests bringing her to America as well.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413.txt
In this email exchange between Jeffrey E and Joscha Bachl, the focus is on human intelligence and learning abilities. Jeffrey argues that it's wrong to use terms like "average humans" or "average ant," as there's no such thing. He also suggests that brains are like nuclei of human cells, and social behavior can be seen as coordinated interactions among individual brains. Joscha brings up the idea that gender differences might play a role in intelligence and learning abilities, stating that males have higher variation in traits which leads to more high IQ men.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026406.txt
The email exchange discusses the differences between males and females in terms of brain size and IQ distribution, with one person arguing that focusing on individual intelligence is important while the other emphasizes the importance of group intelligence. The topic also touches upon genetics, evolution, social behavior, and mathematical thinking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026399.txt
The email exchange discusses topics related to mechanisms of learning and gender differences in traits such as brain size and IQ. The discussion involves a comparison of cells and brains, with the suggestion that brains may be analogous to the nucleus of the human "cell", which is composed of collections and interactions of individual brains. It also touches on the idea that mathematics-based thinking does not allow for censorship, as well as social reasoning versus abstract reasoning in achieving different results. The conversation refers to a previous suggestion about layers and times (L1 - Ln and T1 - Tn), and the possibility of changing them through genetic switches or other methods to alter traits such as intelligence levels.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960.txt
The document is an email conversation between Joscha Bach and Jeffrey E. about human intelligence, gender differences in intelligence, and the mechanisms for learning. The participants argue about whether average humans are fully able to learn how to program or if there is a genetic component to intelligence. They also discuss why more men appear to have high IQs than women despite a similar average brain size difference. Additionally, they talk about mathematical thinking, censorship, social reasoning, and the concept of the "cell" being the nucleus of human society with brains as its equivalent in cells.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.txt
The email discusses mechanisms for learning and intelligence, with a focus on gender differences. It suggests that variation among males is higher than among females, leading to more high IQ men, but only a small difference in average IQ between the genders. The author also proposes the idea that brains are the nucleus of human cells, with each individual brain representing the "membrane" of the cell and the body as the "organism." The email also touches on censorship and social behavior, suggesting that mathematics-based thinking does not allow for censorship and that most people have censorship built in at a deep level.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt
The document is a conversation between two individuals discussing world currencies and personal relationships. The participants mention specific currencies like bitcoin, pound, kroner, franc, sfr, and dollar. They also talk about a person named Andrew and someone referred to as Jane Doe 1 and 2, who are local strippers, and the sender's former girlfriend with whom he had an affair and tried to keep her out of his mess. The sender is considering making a statement about their relationship for reasons of respect and love for his former girlfriend. The conversation also touches on reputation management and protecting one's loved ones during difficult times.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839.txt
The document discusses an issue involving world currencies and a person named Andrew, who had consensual sex with someone who worked for him. The author is considering making a statement about his relationship with this person and the fact that she was never questioned or subpoenaed in relation to the matter. The author also mentions receiving many calls regarding currency matters, which has taken up much of their time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
In an email exchange from January 2015 between Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey E., the topic of world currencies being out of balance is discussed, with Brazil being mentioned as a country affected by this issue. The conversation also touches upon the need for Thomas to come forward and address his association with Andrew in order to move past the story that keeps him linked to it. A statement regarding his former girlfriend's involvement in his personal affairs is suggested as a way to protect her reputation, with plans being made for her to confirm certain details related to their relationship. The mention of france drama also indicates some level of concern or interest in this aspect of the situation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt
The document discusses the issue of separating oneself from Andrew, who is keeping a story alive about consensual sex with a woman named M, who worked for the speaker of the text. The speaker emphasizes that their reputation has taken a hit due to more calls regarding currency than they can handle, and considers making a statement and taking a position on respecting and loving their former girlfriend. The girlfriend is described as serious, having traveled with them almost everywhere, and knowing that Clinton was never on the island.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011304.txt
The document appears to be a court case summary, specifically from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in a case between Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. The case has been assigned case number 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS). The hearing took place on March 31, 2017, at 10:10 am. In the document, the court is addressing a motion to dismiss brought by Maxwell. The judge and attorneys are discussing the scope of the allegations and whether they pertain to sexual abuse or defamation. The plaintiff's attorney clarifies that their claim is solely about the truth or falsity of statements made by Maxwell concerning Giuffre's allegations, but not about her experiences with Jeffrey Epstein.