Documents tagged "Aug"
Found 85 documents with this tag
EFTA00004348-p-036.jpg
The image shows a printed sheet with multiple pictures and some text on it. The upper left photo depicts an indoor scene with two blurred figures; the central and rightmost photos appear to show an outdoor setting with rocks or stone structures; and the lower left photo is partially obscured, showing only a small portion of a person's face. The visible text includes phrases like "Max in 504" and "Maureen in UP," which may refer to people named Max and Maureen. There are red X's over parts of the photos, likely indicating areas that should not be seen or need attention. A date stamp on the bottom right corner reads "Aug 21 1975," suggesting when this print was made or received.
EFTA00001123-p-1.jpg
This is a photograph of an indoor setting showcasing a piece of furniture, specifically a sofa with decorative pillows. The sofa has a classic design with rolled armrests and appears to be upholstered in a light fabric that contrasts with the dark blue wall behind it. There's visible text on the image, which seems to include a date "13 Aug 2015" and possibly other information at the bottom of the frame, but the text is not fully legible. The style of the photograph suggests it might be from an interior design or furniture catalog, given its focus on the sofa with a clean background that highlights the piece without any distractions.
DOJ-OGR-00006068.jpg
The image displays a document with a blue header at the top, containing text that seems to be a reference number "2019/15" and a date "7 Aug 2019." Below this header is more text which appears to be part of an official notice or statement. The body of the text includes phrases like "It has come to our attention," suggesting that it is informing the recipient of a situation that needs attention. There are also references to specific matters and requests for information or actions. The overall style of the document suggests it's likely intended for formal communication, possibly within an organizational context.
DOJ-OGR-00026447.jpg
The image shows a printed document titled "PATIENT WATCH LIST" with the date indicated as Aug 12th 2020. It appears to be a form used for medical purposes, possibly within a hospital setting. The text includes several columns labeled "Name," "Gender," "Age," and others which might refer to patient information, although the specific details are not clear due to the resolution of the image. The document is marked with handwritten notes in blue ink, including underlining certain items and writing numbers next to them. These annotations suggest that someone has reviewed this list, perhaps for quality assurance or clinical purposes. The overall style of the image is straightforward and functional, typical of administrative forms used in healthcare environments.
DOJ-OGR-00025682.jpg
The image shows a scanned document with faded colors, making it difficult to read the text clearly. The text appears to be a list of items, possibly bullet points from a report or presentation. There is a date mentioned on the top left corner, indicating when the document was created or last modified: "Mon, Aug 20 17:38". The document contains several handwritten annotations and markings in red and blue ink, suggesting that someone has reviewed or edited the content. The overall condition of the paper indicates it is well-used or aged.
DOJ-OGR-00021891.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of a document with redacted content. The document is titled "SECRET" and has a header that includes the date "28 Aug 06" and what seems to be a page number "19". Below the header, there's text that mentions "National Security" and it lists points numbered from "5." onwards. However, due to redaction, most of the visible content is obscured. The document appears to be official or confidential in nature, given its classification and the topic being discussed.
DOJ-OGR-00020434.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of an official document or webpage with a red header that includes some numbers and possibly a date "28 Aug 2017" at the top left corner. There are columns of text that seem to list various pieces of information, including what could be names, locations, times, and possibly dates. The content is too small to read in detail, but it suggests an organized record or schedule of events or activities. The style of the document is typical for a formal report or informational sheet, with a structured layout meant to convey data efficiently.
DOJ-OGR-00020396.jpg
The image shows a document with printed information. At the top of the page, there is a date and time stamp that reads "Fri, Aug 29 07:51 AM" and an electronic file format indicator showing the document to be in PDF (Portable Document Format). Below this, there are two columns containing data, which appears to be a list or table with various headings such as "Name," "Date of Birth," and other personal details typically used for identification purposes. Each entry is formatted in a structured manner suggesting it could be part of an official document like a personnel record, directory, or registry. The text is too small to read clearly, but the overall style of the document suggests an official or administrative function.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033503.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of service on two individuals named Maxwell and Trump, who are likely defendants in a legal case. The names are redacted to maintain confidentiality. The emails also reference Jane Doe as a plaintiff or witness in the case. Jacquie Johnson appears to be a paralegal at Burman Critton Lutier & Coleman, and Jessica Cadwell is another individual involved in the discussion. The content of the emails suggests that efforts are being made to obtain information from these individuals for legal purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of legal proceedings involving a person named Jane Doe and another individual. Key people in the conversation include Jessica Cadwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Jacquie Johnson, and Maxwell. The conversations take place between August 11 and 12, 2009, and refer to efforts to serve legal documents on various individuals involved in the case. The location of these emails is West Palm Beach, FL.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt
The email discusses the potential impact of Donald Trump's campaign on the presidential race, as well as the possibility of a collapse similar to Bretton Woods. The author expresses concern about the potential effect on markets and asks for advice on what to do in response. It is noted that the information contained in the communication is confidential and intended only for the recipient.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt
The email discusses the impact of Donald Trump's presidential campaign on the stock market and China's currency devaluation. It mentions Jeffrey, who is likely a financial expert or advisor, as well as JEE, which could be an organization or company involved in the discussion. The information contained in the communication is confidential and intended only for the use of the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt
The document discusses an article by Stormy Daniels on the Bossip website which claims that Donald Trump only lasted two minutes during sex with her. The author, Nicholas Ribis, mentions that he saw this in Europe and it will drive Trump crazy. There is also a mention of Jefferey E's email address jeevacation@gmail.com.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt
The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Tim Zagat discussing meeting availability after the 15th of September. The email mentions a book, "House of Trump, House of Putin" that Jeffrey has been sent in case he hasn't already received it. The email also contains confidentiality and unauthorized use disclaimers as well as copyright information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033108.txt
The document contains emails between Jeffrey E. and Weingarten, Reid discussing current events such as Donald Trump's lawyer, David Pecker, and Michael Cohen. One email mentions a civil suit by Avenatti going front and center. The communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033107.txt
The document is a series of emails between Jeffrey E. and Reid Weingarten discussing their opinions on Michael Cohen, who has been making headlines in relation to President Trump. The discussion includes the possibility of Cohen causing more trouble for Trump and potential civil suits. The emails also include cautionary language about confidentiality and privilege of communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016.txt
The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey and Stanley Rosenberg discussing a meeting about the vagus nerve, Trump's proposed budget cuts to scientific research, and coverage in The Huffington Post. They discuss potential travel plans for September 18th, and Jeffrey suggests using Skype or phone instead of a conference call. Stanley mentions Linda Stone as someone he met with years ago who suggested contacting Jeffrey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033015.txt
This email discusses the importance of scientific inquiry and funding for research. Jeffrey E. has helped scientists for 20 years by testing ideas against evidence. He believes that mathematics is important as it can describe complex phenomena in simple equations, like the motion of planets. The most important scientific invention according to him is air conditioning. In response to questions about how he has helped scientists during Trump's budget cuts and why funding the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics is crucial, Jeffrey E. suggests reaching out to Martin. The email also includes a note that the information contained in it is confidential and should not be shared with others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033014.txt
The email discusses the importance of funding for scientific research, specifically mentioning the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics. It also refers to private donors such as Jeffrey Epstein who have contributed significant funds to scientific advancement. The sender suggests contacting Robert Trivers for further information on this topic. Additionally, there are questions about the impact of Trump's budget cuts on science funding and how scientists can still thrive in spite of these challenges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032845.txt
The email discusses the potential impact of Donald Trump's statements on the market, with one person comparing it to a devaluation race similar to that seen during the Breton Woods collapse. The email also mentions China and notes that unauthorized use or disclosure of the information contained in the communication is strictly prohibited.