Documents tagged "Court"
Found 352 documents with this tag
EFTA00008998-p-17.jpg
The image is a scan of a document with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The top part of the document appears to be a list with numbers from 1 to 9 followed by questions in brackets. Each question seems to prompt a response, indicated by the space provided next to each one for writing an answer. Below this list is another section titled "STATEMENT OF CASE" which has text typed on it. The visible part of this section includes phrases such as "in 1984" and mentions a court case. There's a name mentioned in the context of "I have been informed that Mr. [name redacted]" indicating communication or involvement with this individual. The bottom portion contains additional handwritten text, which is partially obscured and not entirely clear. However, it includes words such as "case" and another name, suggesting that it continues to discuss the legal case mentioned earlier. The document is a piece of paper with visible creases, indicating it has been handled or folded. The overall impression is that this is some form of legal document, possibly used in preparation for testimony or as a reference during court proceedings.
EFTA00008998-p-16.jpg
The image displays a document with printed text on it, which appears to be a news article related to court proceedings involving the State of New York. The document is black and white, and there are two columns of text visible in the captured portion. The style of the text suggests an official or formal publication, possibly from a legal or governmental source. There's no image of people, locations, or significant objects other than the printed document itself.
EFTA00008998-p-15.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten annotations on it. The annotations are not legible due to the quality of the scan. The document contains printed text which seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a lawsuit. There's a header at the top that includes a date and some numbers, indicating a reference or identification number for the case or proceeding. A significant object in the image is the word "VIOLATION" written in bold letters within the body of the text. The document has a formal appearance typical of official legal documents.
EFTA00008998-p-14.jpg
The image is a black and white photograph of an old document with visible text on it. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings or criminal cases, as indicated by phrases such as "CRIMINAL DIVISION," "OFFENSES AGAINST MINORS," and "UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONTACT." The document includes a list of items, which may refer to evidence or charges, and there is a reference to a specific court case with the number 91-3077. The writing style suggests that it could be from the late 20th century. There are no images of people, locations, or significant objects other than the text on the document itself.
EFTA00008998-p-10.jpg
The image is a scanned document titled "BILL OF PARTICULARS" related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides specific details about events and actions concerning the defendant's conduct in New York City. It appears to be part of legal proceedings, likely from a court or an attorney's office, given its formal and structured layout.
EFTA00008998-p-08.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with typed text on it. The focus is not sharp, and the text is not fully legible due to the quality and angle of the photo. However, it seems to be some sort of legal or official document, possibly related to a court case or investigation, as indicated by the references to "victim" and "defendant" in the visible text. The document is on paper with visible lines that suggest it could have been typed on a typewriter or printed out from a computer with some sort of template. The background behind the document is nondescript and does not provide any additional context about the situation or location where this document was photographed.
EFTA00008998-p-07.jpg
The image shows a document page with various lines of text. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings as it refers to witnesses and their statements during a court case. There is a section that mentions the name "MARTIN VICKERS" in bold, suggesting he might be an important figure in the context of the document. Other names are also present on the page, indicating multiple individuals involved or mentioned within the legal proceedings. The text is dense and seems to detail specific statements made by these witnesses, though the exact content is not clear due to the resolution of the image. There are no images of people or locations; it's a textual document without any illustrations or additional graphics.
EFTA00008998-p-05.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document that contains several paragraphs of text related to legal proceedings. The first paragraph discusses the admissibility of evidence about the truthfulness of an individual and whether it's relevant to their credibility in court. The second paragraph mentions specific years (1976, 1980) and the names "MARGARET," "RANDALL," and "SUSAN" without providing further context. Below the text is a photo of an urban scene that includes trees lining the street and a building with classical architectural features. The photo is taken during daylight hours, as indicated by the natural lighting. There are no people visible in the photograph, focusing instead on the architecture and environment of what appears to be a public area or courtyard.
EFTA00008998-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with various pieces of information, some of which are partially obscured. At the top right corner, there's a red stamp that reads "DELIVERY RECEIPT/MAIL ROOM" and underneath it is "REC'D MAY 20 1997." Below this stamp, there is text that appears to be related to legal proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The name "HAMAS" is mentioned in the context of a case. The document seems to be an official court filing or notice, as indicated by the structured layout and formal language used. It includes numbered points, with point number one visible, which mentions charges against individuals related to Hamas, including conspiracy to provide material support to Hamas for acts of terrorism and other crimes. There's a reference to "the 1993 bombing at the World Trade Center" as part of these allegations. The text on the document is in English and it is written in black ink against a white background. The style of the image suggests that it could be a photograph or digital scan of an official court document, with handwritten notes and annotations made by someone handling the document.
EFTA00008920-p-75.jpg
The image displays a document with text that appears to be handwritten, though the content is partially obscured by black marks and lines, suggesting it may be sensitive or redacted information. The date "06/27/97" is visible at the top right corner of the page. There's no visible person in the image, but there are sections labeled with numbers from 1 to 13, indicating questions or topics that need to be discussed or addressed. The first line of text underlined suggests a topic about "certification and/or acknowledgment of receipt" related to court proceedings or legal matters. The document has been stamped at the bottom right corner with an official-looking seal or mark, which includes what seems to be a signature but is too small to discern clearly. The style of the image is that of a scanned document, possibly from an official court case file or a related legal matter, given the context and the type of writing instrument used (likely ink pen).
EFTA00008920-p-71.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with some blacked-out sections, suggesting that sensitive information has been redacted. The visible parts show what seems to be an affidavit or statement from an individual who is identified as a witness for the prosecution in a court case, likely related to a criminal investigation or trial. There are checkboxes and spaces for answers next to questions about the witness's identity, their knowledge of the subject matter, and whether they would like the opportunity to read any questions aloud. The name of the person making the statement is redacted, as well as other details that could potentially reveal personal information or compromise the legal process. The document has a formal layout with headers and numbered paragraphs, indicating it is an official court document.
EFTA00008920-p-70.jpg
The image shows a scanned document with several lines of text that appear to be partially obscured by a redacted pattern, typically used to hide sensitive information such as names or addresses. The top left corner of the document has a redacted date and time stamp which indicates when the record was created or accessed. There are also headings with numbers followed by questions and answers, but the content is not fully legible due to the redaction. The text at the bottom suggests that this could be an official legal or governmental record, possibly related to a court proceeding or law enforcement documentation.
EFTA00008920-p-64.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes that appear to be related to an interview conducted by the FBI on December 17th, 2019. The focus of the notes seems to be the questioning about emails, specifically whether the subject mentioned checking emails before or after certain events. There are multiple questions listed and answered with "Yes" or "No." The document appears to be a legal record, possibly from a criminal investigation or court proceeding, given the context provided by visible text on the page.
EFTA00008920-p-62.jpg
The image shows a document with multiple pages that appear to be a court transcript, given the formal layout and structure. The top page has visible handwritten notes, possibly annotations or corrections. There's a red pen mark through some of the text on this page, indicating deletion or correction. Due to the resolution and angle, specific details such as names, locations, and significant objects are not fully legible. The document is printed in black ink on white paper, and there's a visible watermark across it that reads "Docket Entry/Order - 52978536" followed by what seems to be a timestamp "11-04-99 07:40 PM." The quality of the image is low, which makes it challenging to read the text clearly.
EFTA00008920-p-60.jpg
The image is a blurred photograph of what appears to be an official document with redacted text. The background of the photo is indistinct due to the focus being on the top section of the paper, which has been blurred out. The visible portion includes some writing, but it's not legible because it has been redacted in a way that obscures the content. The style of the image suggests it could be a court document or a formal report with sensitive information removed.
EFTA00008920-p-53.jpg
The image displays a page from a legal document with redacted content. The top of the page shows partially obscured handwriting and is dated "06/28/91" with "84" visible in another part of the page. There are black rectangles superimposed over some text, presumably to protect sensitive information. The rest of the page includes lists of questions and answers that appear to be related to a court case or legal proceedings. It is not clear from this image what the nature of the case is or the identities of the individuals involved due to the redactions.
EFTA00008920-p-41.jpg
The image is of a document with a header that reads "COURT REPORTER" followed by the date "6/27/01" and a page number "113" in the top right corner. It appears to be a transcript from a court proceeding, as indicated by the numbered questions (Q) and answers (A). The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to contain statements made by individuals during the course of legal proceedings. There's also a mention of a person named "MARTIN" in one of the responses. The overall style of the image suggests an official court document with typed content and handwritten notes or corrections on some lines.
EFTA00008920-p-38.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with several lines of text that are partially obscured by redacted lines. The visible text includes what seems to be a question and answer session format, as indicated by the headings "Q" and "A" followed by actual questions and answers respectively. However, most of the content is hidden due to the redaction process. The document also contains some personal information at the bottom that has been redacted for privacy purposes. This includes a name, an address, and a phone number, which are typically used for identification or contact purposes in official documents. The quality of the image is not very high, making it difficult to discern finer details clearly. The layout suggests this could be part of an interview transcript, court proceeding notes, or some kind of investigative report where personal details and potentially sensitive information have been intentionally concealed.
EFTA00008920-p-37.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and lines of writing. The style of the handwriting suggests that it is a manual transcription or notetaking from an interview or testimony, possibly related to court proceedings. The text includes questions like "Did you make any attempts to locate your husband" and "Did you ever discuss a divorce." Names such as "Susie" are mentioned, indicating individuals involved in the discussion or case. There are also phrases like "informant's father" and "her husband's car parked next to her house," which provide context about relationships and locations. The document appears to be an official record with headers and footers typically used in legal or investigative documentation.
EFTA00008920-p-29.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document, possibly an interview transcript or statement record, with several lines of handwritten text. The document appears to be from an official proceeding due to the structured layout, numbering of questions, and the use of abbreviations such as "Q" for question and "A" for answer. There are some sections where text has been redacted with black lines covering it, indicating sensitive information is being concealed. The visible parts of the text include a reference to a specific date and time, which suggests that this document may be part of a court case or legal investigation. Additionally, there's a section titled "Docket Number" and other headings like "Question" followed by "Answer," implying an interview format. There are no visible images or people in the image; it is entirely text-based on a white background.