Documents tagged "Handwritten"
Found 743 documents with this tag
EFTA00008874-p-17.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper with the number "19" in the top right corner and appears to be a list with some lines crossed out. The text is not entirely legible due to the angle and quality of the photo, but one visible line reads: "I was born at an old country crossroad." There's also a signature towards the bottom of the page, which seems to read "Ann Shirley" followed by the title "Owner/Actor" and possibly the name of a business or organization, although it is not fully legible. The background is plain and does not provide any additional context.
EFTA00008874-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. At the top of the document is a line that reads "THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR RELEASE AT THIS TIME WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SECRETARY." The document appears to be related to legal proceedings or matters, as suggested by phrases such as "motion for rehearing," "petitioner's brief," and "respondent's brief." Handwritten annotations include words like "redo," "add," "delete," and "edit," indicating editorial instructions. The text is a mix of black ink and typewriter font, which suggests the document might be from an earlier time when typewriters were commonly used for official correspondence or legal documents.
EFTA00008874-p-11.jpg
The image you've shared appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes. The content of the document is not fully legible due to the quality and angle at which it was photographed, but I can see that there are multiple paragraphs with text written in a cursive script. There's also some typed text on the page, though much of it is obscured. In addition, there is an underlined section that seems important or emphasized. The handwritten notes are scattered across the document and include phrases such as "not clear," "important," and numbers like "1234567890." These annotations suggest that the reader was actively engaged with the content of the document, possibly highlighting key points or areas for further review. The background of the image is plain and does not provide any additional context or visual elements. The focus of the image is clearly on conveying information through text, which is typical for documents used in academic, legal, or administrative settings.
EFTA00008874-p-09.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The printed content is too small to read clearly, but it appears to be an official document, possibly related to legal proceedings or court proceedings based on the visible headings and the context suggested by the annotations. The handwriting includes corrections and highlights made in pen, emphasizing certain words or phrases within the text. The document's background is a standard white paper with no additional graphics or images.
EFTA00008870-p-3.jpg
The image shows a document with printed content that is not fully readable due to the quality of the image. It appears to be a form or checklist filled out with various items checked off and some handwritten annotations in black ink. The visible text includes phrases such as "Dr. Amit Mishra," "Ground floor," "A/C unit," and other unidentifiable words that are partially obscured or cut off by the image's edges. The document also has a watermark-like design in the background. There are no people visible in the image.
EFTA00008863-p-7.jpg
The image presents two message pads from Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Both pads are labeled as "Important Message" and contain handwritten messages, suggesting urgent communication. The top pad is partially covered with a blue stamp, obscuring some of the text, while the bottom pad has no visible stamps. The background is plain, placing emphasis on the message pads.
EFTA00008863-p-6.jpg
The image shows two pieces of paper with handwritten messages and a heading that reads "Message Pads from Epstein's Palm Beach Residence". One note appears to be addressed to an individual named "Ghislaine", while the other is addressed to someone referred to as "she". Both notes are written on lined notepaper. The text in the image includes references to phone calls and instructions regarding what needs to be done after speaking with Ghislaine or 'she'.
EFTA00008744-p-116.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it. The text is partially obscured and redacted, but the visible parts suggest questions and answers related to an investigation or case review. There are numbered lines with writing and checkmarks, indicating the structure of the information presented. There's also a signature at the bottom right corner, which seems to be that of the person who filled out this form or took part in the discussion. The document appears to be from a formal or official source due to its structured layout and professional context.
EFTA00008744-p-115.jpg
The image shows a sheet of paper with printed content that appears to be a transcript or notes from an interview or conversation. The paper is partially obscured by handwriting and marks, including lines drawn through some of the text and sections of words crossed out. There are visible lines where it seems like information was intentionally redacted or concealed. The document has numbered questions (e.g., "Q: I'm sorry I don't understand") followed by typed answers (e.g., "A: That's okay, I can clarify"). There are also handwritten annotations on the paper, such as arrows pointing to certain sections and underlines marking important information. The document is not dated or otherwise identified within the image itself.
EFTA00008744-p-112.jpg
The image appears to be a handwritten page, possibly from an interview or a meeting transcript. It contains several lines of written text with question numbers and answers related to a conversation about an individual's work experience, particularly with regards to their knowledge of certain technical systems, as indicated by phrases like "flight control system" and "flight control computers." The handwriting is somewhat formal and legible, suggesting that the page was prepared in a professional setting. There are no visible images or other graphics on the page apart from the text itself.
EFTA00008744-p-111.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it, taken from an angle where the text and annotations are clearly visible. The content of the document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by terms such as "counsel," "judge," and "witness." There are multiple lines crossed out in red ink, suggesting revisions or deletions made during preparation for court. The specific details within the text are obscured due to redaction marks, which prevent certain portions from being read clearly.
EFTA00008744-p-109.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed answers on the right side. The questions are obscured by redacted lines, indicating that sensitive information has been removed for privacy. There is visible text at the bottom of the page which includes what seems to be a date stamp in black ink, but specific details or text within the document are not clear due to the quality and angle of the scan. The overall style of the image suggests it might be related to an interview or questionnaire process.
EFTA00008744-p-108.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes that appear to be related to legal proceedings, specifically referring to a case involving someone named "Scott" and a witness statement from an individual named "Melissa." The text is partially redacted, which means certain parts have been intentionally obscured or hidden, often to protect sensitive information or for privacy reasons. There are no visible people in the image, as it is focused on the textual content of the paper.
EFTA00008744-p-107.jpg
The image shows a document with redacted text and handwritten notes. The document appears to be an official letter or report, with numbered questions on the left side, each followed by a response. Some responses are blacked out, suggesting sensitive information has been obscured. There's visible text such as "A? Yes" underlined in answer to one question. Handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain parts of the document, indicating sections that have been deemed unnecessary or irrelevant. The redacted areas suggest there might be personal or confidential data within the document.
EFTA00008744-p-102.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with typed text and handwritten annotations. The paper seems to contain notes or questions, possibly related to an interview or meeting given the context provided by some visible text like "Q: Did he say anything about his son?" There are several lines crossed out with what looks like a pen or pencil, indicating certain items were removed or deemed unimportant. The top right corner has a stamp that is partially obscured and includes phone numbers which suggests it might be related to an official organization or legal proceedings. The style of the text and annotations suggest it could be from an older document, possibly from the early 2000s given the date "2/14/2003" indicated in the top right corner.
EFTA00008744-p-101.jpg
The image is a photograph of a piece of paper with typed information on it. The focus is blurred, but the text appears to contain numbered questions and corresponding answers related to an investigation or questioning session, possibly for legal or official purposes. There are also handwritten annotations on the paper, such as "Yes" written next to some of the questions, indicating responses. The top of the page has a phone number and what seems like an email address, but the text is cut off in the image. The style of the document suggests it might be from an official interview or deposition transcript.
EFTA00008744-p-099.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document with handwritten text and markings on it. The text is not fully legible due to the angle at which the photo was taken and the quality of the image. However, I can make out some phrases like "how", "they get that information", "just remember", and "what they were from". There are also numbers written in black ink, including 1920 and 58. In addition to the handwritten text, there are several lines drawn across parts of the document with a pen, indicating corrections or annotations have been made. The background of the image is mostly white, suggesting that the document was on top of a light-colored surface. There are no visible people or distinct locations in the image; it's focused solely on the piece of paper with writing and markings.
EFTA00008744-p-098.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten text that appears to be an interview transcript or notes from a conversation. The text is black and seems to include questions and answers, but the actual content of the dialogue is not fully visible due to some words being crossed out with red ink. There are no people or locations depicted in this textual image, and all objects mentioned are related to the text itself. The handwriting style is cursive, suggesting that the document was created by someone who wanted to maintain a certain level of formality in their notes.
EFTA00008744-p-095.jpg
The image displays a handwritten note, possibly related to an interview or investigation given the context of questions and answers. The text is difficult to read due to quality and angle. However, one can make out words such as "interview," "question," "answer," "sexual assault," and "medical records." There are various numbers and lines connecting different parts of the text, which might indicate a flow or sequence in the interview process.
EFTA00008744-p-094.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper. The text is somewhat obscured due to the angle and quality of the photo, but it appears to be related to an investigation, possibly a police report, given the references to statements made by witnesses or individuals involved in an incident. There are redacted parts where information has been deliberately covered up for privacy or security reasons. It's not clear what specific case this document refers to due to the redactions and the quality of the image.