Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "However"

Found 990 documents with this tag

EFTA00008874-p-04.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of printed text on paper, with the focus blurry and slightly out of alignment, making it difficult to read all the words clearly. However, from what can be discerned, it seems like an official document or report containing information that is too small to be described accurately. The text might include headings, subheadings, paragraphs, and possibly some figures or tables. There are no visible images of people, locations, or significant objects aside from the printed text itself.

EFTA00008744-p-110.jpg

The image you've sent appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with typed text on it. However, the text is heavily redacted or obscured by black marks, making it impossible to read any specific content. There are visible numbers and lines indicating the structure of the document, possibly a list or notes. The redaction suggests that this could be sensitive information or an official document where confidentiality is crucial.

EFTA00008744-p-100.jpg

The image you've shared is quite blurry and lacks clear focus, making it difficult to discern specific details. However, I can tell you that there seems to be a document with typed text on it. The document appears to have a header at the top and several paragraphs below. Due to the quality of the image, any text or other distinguishing marks are not legible. If there were people or locations in the image, they would be too indistinct for me to describe accurately.

EFTA00008744-p-099.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document with handwritten text and markings on it. The text is not fully legible due to the angle at which the photo was taken and the quality of the image. However, I can make out some phrases like "how", "they get that information", "just remember", and "what they were from". There are also numbers written in black ink, including 1920 and 58. In addition to the handwritten text, there are several lines drawn across parts of the document with a pen, indicating corrections or annotations have been made. The background of the image is mostly white, suggesting that the document was on top of a light-colored surface. There are no visible people or distinct locations in the image; it's focused solely on the piece of paper with writing and markings.

EFTA00008744-p-097.jpg

The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers that appear to be from an interview. The questions are listed on the left side of the page under numbers such as "1," "2," etc., while the corresponding answers are on the right. Specific text in the image is not detailed due to the limitations of my capabilities. However, the document has been redacted with black marks, obscuring certain sections of text and possibly personal or sensitive information. The style of the document suggests it might be a transcript from an interview or court proceeding.

EFTA00008744-p-095.jpg

The image displays a handwritten note, possibly related to an interview or investigation given the context of questions and answers. The text is difficult to read due to quality and angle. However, one can make out words such as "interview," "question," "answer," "sexual assault," and "medical records." There are various numbers and lines connecting different parts of the text, which might indicate a flow or sequence in the interview process.

EFTA00008744-p-093.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The text is redacted, with black lines covering some portions, presumably to conceal sensitive information. The redactions are scattered across the page, obscuring specific details that might be otherwise visible. The visible parts suggest this could be an interview transcript or a report summarizing conversations, as evidenced by phrases like "Q: Did you speak with Smith?" and "A: Yes." However, the identities of individuals mentioned in the notes are hidden due to the redactions.

EFTA00008744-p-092.jpg

The image appears to be a redacted document, possibly from a legal case or an official investigation, given the context of the text and the formal nature of the layout. The document is structured with numbered questions (Q) followed by answers (A) that correspond to them, suggesting an interview transcript or questionnaire responses. However, due to the redaction marks covering most of the visible content, it's not possible to provide specific details about people, locations, objects, or the actual context of the document. The purpose of this image seems to be for illustrative purposes related to redacted documents and their presentation.

EFTA00008744-p-084.jpg

The image displays a blurred document with a series of questions and answers printed on it. The handwriting appears to be informal and somewhat messy. Due to the resolution and blurriness of the photo, specific details such as text content and other elements are not clearly distinguishable. However, the presence of lines connecting the questions to their corresponding answers suggests a structured format for responding to inquiries or conducting an investigation.

EFTA00008744-p-068.jpg

The image shows a blurred piece of paper with text that is partially obscured by a red rectangle. The text within the visible parts includes a question and answer format. A specific question can be seen: "Q: What was your first impression about coming to this message board?" However, the rest of the question and all answers are cut off or hidden behind the red rectangle. Additionally, there is a phone number at the bottom right corner of the image. The overall quality and content of the image suggest it might be a scanned document or a photograph of a physical paper with handwritten notes.

EFTA00008744-p-061.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten content and some typed text. The majority of the information on the page is redacted, meaning sensitive or private details have been obscured to maintain privacy. However, from what can be seen, there are sections labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers, indicating an interview or question-and-answer session. There is a reference to a name in the typed text, but it too has been redacted. The document appears to be of an official nature, possibly related to law enforcement given the context provided by the visible fragments of text.

EFTA00008744-p-058.jpg

The image displays a text document with black ink on white paper. The text is organized into numbered lines, suggesting it's structured like a list or questionnaire. However, the actual content of the text is obscured by various sections of redacted areas, preventing the reading of the original information. These redactions are consistent throughout the document and obscure large chunks of the text. The style of the image indicates it may be an official paper, possibly from a legal or governmental context, given the formal layout and use of redacted content.

EFTA00008744-p-046.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings, as suggested by the phrases "judge", "counsel", and "court record". However, most of the text has been redacted or obscured in black ink, making it difficult to discern the full details. A date stamp on the document indicates that it was received on October 19th, 2015. The visible part of one question reads: "Q: Did you have occasion to be at a particular address".

EFTA00008744-p-043.jpg

The image displays a document with handwritten notes on it, which appear to be questions and answers related to an interview or testimony. The text is organized into numbered points, each followed by a question mark indicating an inquiry. The person whose statement is being transcribed seems to have discussed their memory of certain events and the physical description of another person. One visible portion of text reads "Q: What did he say about being on register?" However, due to the document's resolution and angle, it's difficult to discern additional details from this image alone.

EFTA00008744-p-024.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document or a printed paper with several lines of text that have been redacted or blacked out for privacy or security purposes. The visible parts of the text seem to be organized in question-and-answer format, but due to the redaction, specific details about the questions and answers are not clear. There is also a footer at the bottom of the page that includes additional information. It contains a phone number (866) 452-7019, an email address (<EMAIL>), and an indication of the author or owner's name with a redacted surname ("Terry"). The document is dated "09/30/2021" at the top right corner. The style of the image suggests it might be related to an interview transcript or some form of legal or investigative documentation, given the format and the presence of questions and answers. However, without more context, the exact nature of the document remains speculative due to the redactions.

EFTA00008744-p-020.jpg

The image displays a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers on it. The text is partially obscured by the redacted sections indicated by black rectangles, suggesting sensitive information has been hidden for privacy purposes. The visible text includes phrases like "Did you know", "What do you think", and "How many times", which appear to be prompts for responses related to personal or private matters. However, due to the redaction, it's difficult to discern the full context of the questions or the nature of the answers provided in this document.

EFTA00008708-p-6.jpg

The image is a scanned document with text. The document appears to be an official paper, possibly related to legal proceedings or court records, as indicated by the presence of sections titled "MOTION" and "ORDER." There are several lines of text under these headings, but the specific content is not described in detail as it would require transcription. The document's background is white, and there are no visible images or illustrations within its borders. The font used for the text varies in size, with some sections appearing larger than others. There are horizontal lines separating different parts of the text, suggesting a structured format commonly found in legal documents. The image resolution is low, making it difficult to read the finer details of the text. However, there are no visible people or locations within this document as it primarily contains written information. The overall style and layout suggest formality and an official context.

EFTA00008708-p-1.jpg

The image shows a piece of official legal paperwork with text and sections that are typical for court documents. The paper has various headings such as "United States District Court" and "Case Number: 19-02794." There is also information regarding the date, time, and location, which includes "December 12, 2019," "3:15 PM EST," and "United States Courthouse, Room 6008, Washington, DC." The document appears to be a summons or notice of a legal proceeding, as indicated by the words "SUMMONS" in large letters at the top left corner. The text is written in black ink on a white background, and there are several lines of text that provide specific details about the case. However, due to the image's resolution, some of the text may not be entirely legible. The document has been folded, which creates a crease across its center, indicating it was likely sent through mail or carried by hand.

EFTA00008631-p-74.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes. The text on the paper is not fully visible due to a watermark that obscures certain parts of it. However, some visible phrases suggest that the text might be related to answering questions or responses to statements such as "I am sorry" and references to taking responsibility. There are also numerical values and percentages noted, but their context is unclear because they are partially hidden by the watermark. The paper appears to be a transcript or notes from an interview or meeting session.

EFTA00008631-p-73.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with printed text on it. Due to the resolution and quality of the scan, some words are not entirely clear. However, from what can be discerned, there seems to be a list of questions or prompts, each followed by an answer in parentheses. The text is structured like an interview or questionnaire format, with numbered points and responses that correspond to them. There are no people visible in the image as it is focused on the textual content of the document.

PreviousPage 3 of 50Next