Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Justice Department"

Found 27 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026605.txt

The document discusses a story about Kathryn Ruemmler, former White House counsel, who has turned down an offer to succeed Eric Holder as U.S. Attorney General. She was concerned that her experience as a close adviser to President Obama would lead to a difficult confirmation process in the current highly charged partisan environment and that it could ignite political attacks against the president. Her withdrawal leaves no obvious front-runner to replace Holder, who announced his intention to step down once a replacement is confirmed. Other candidates being considered for the position include Solicitor General Don Verrilli; Labor Secretary Tom Perez; Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt

This document discusses several key individuals who have left their jobs or been removed from high-profile positions. The conversation mentions former FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, as well as FBI General Counsel James Baker and Strzok, who was taken off a special counsel investigation. The participants also discuss the resignation of Justice Department number 3 and its significance. There are also references to Goofy corrupt giveaways and the last bill that they were looking for in it.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026444.txt

The document discusses the potential nomination of a high-powered attorney named Weingarten as a federal judge by the Trump administration. The choice is considered somewhat unusual because he has represented Democratic clients and has close ties to Eric Holder, who served as attorney general under President Obama. The four finalists for the position have not responded to requests for comment, and a White House official declined to comment on the matter. It should be noted that the information contained in this communication is confidential and intended only for the recipient.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt

The document discusses a conversation between two individuals regarding an article on sexism in the tech industry. The story involves Day One Ventures founder Masha Drokova who was advised by potential investors to get a male co-founder when raising her fund. The individuals mention that while she initially considered this suggestion, she realized it stemmed from sexism and ultimately rejected it. Additionally, they highlight an upcoming event featuring interviews with NBA star Draymond Green and other notable figures in the tech industry.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020143.txt

This email is a forwarded message with an excerpt from Pro Rata by Kia Kokalitcheva. The key topic discussed in the message is about sexism and the challenges faced by female founders, particularly when raising funds for their businesses. The author mentions that Day One Ventures founder Masha Drokova was advised to get a male co-founder while raising her fund. This highlights the ongoing issue of gender inequality in the business world.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603.txt

This document discusses whether crime victims have rights during criminal investigations using the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) as a focal point. The issue was brought to light when the Justice Department released a memorandum stating that the CVRA does not grant any rights to crime victims until formal charges are filed, which means many crime victims may never receive their due rights in the criminal justice process. The authors argue that crime victims should have rights during investigations to ensure they are treated fairly and can participate actively in the legal proceedings. The document references a law review article by Paul G. Cassell, Nathanael J. Mitchell, and Bradley J. Edwards on this topic.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014037.txt

The article discusses whether crime victims should have rights during criminal investigations, focusing on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and its applicability before criminal charges are filed. The authors argue that if victims do not have rights during investigations, many will never receive any protection or support from the legal system. They also address a recent memorandum by the Justice Department contending that the CVRA does not extend rights to crime victims until formal charges are filed. The article is published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, with authors Paul G. Cassell, Nathanael J. Mitchell, and Bradley J. Edwards.

PreviousPage 2 of 2