Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Personal"

Found 307 documents with this tag

EFTA00008892-p-17.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with several areas redacted, typically done to obscure sensitive information such as personal details or confidential data. At the top of the page, there is some text that appears to be a title or heading, but it's obscured by the redaction marks. Below this, the name "Mr. John Smith" is visible, suggesting it could be an application form or similar document where names are required for identification purposes. The address and date fields are also partially redacted; however, you can see that they refer to a location in New York City on February 15th, but the year is obscured. There's no context provided about the purpose of the document or why it has been redacted, as this would typically be determined by any additional information not visible in the image.

EFTA00008892-p-12.jpg

The image is a scanned document featuring a letter from the InterContinental hotel chain to an individual named Christine. The date of the letter is December 21, 1993. It appears to be a personal letter, possibly regarding hotel accommodation or services during her stay. The hotel's logo is visible in the upper left corner of the document. There are handwritten notes on the letter, including highlighting and underlining certain text, which seems to indicate important information was communicated.

EFTA00008874-p-07.jpg

The image is of a document with black text on white paper. It appears to be a formal report or letter, possibly related to legal matters due to the presence of phrases like "violation" and "victims." The document mentions specific cases and individuals, including a reference to a person named "VICTIM1" and another referred to as a "child victim." There are details about incidents that occurred in different years, with one incident occurring in 2014 and others in the following years. It seems to be describing personal actions towards these victims. The text is too small for me to transcribe verbatim or provide more specific information about the content of the document.

EFTA00008870-p-4.jpg

The image displays a printed document with redacted text. The visible sections show dates and times on the left side, possibly indicating appointments or deadlines. There is also some personal information obscured by redaction marks, suggesting that this may be sensitive data such as names or contact details. At the bottom of the page, there's an email address provided alongside what appears to be a phone number, both likely intended for communication related to the content of the document. The redactions indicate that personal information has been intentionally obscured to protect privacy.

EFTA00008744-p-107.jpg

The image shows a document with redacted text and handwritten notes. The document appears to be an official letter or report, with numbered questions on the left side, each followed by a response. Some responses are blacked out, suggesting sensitive information has been obscured. There's visible text such as "A? Yes" underlined in answer to one question. Handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain parts of the document, indicating sections that have been deemed unnecessary or irrelevant. The redacted areas suggest there might be personal or confidential data within the document.

EFTA00008744-p-097.jpg

The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers that appear to be from an interview. The questions are listed on the left side of the page under numbers such as "1," "2," etc., while the corresponding answers are on the right. Specific text in the image is not detailed due to the limitations of my capabilities. However, the document has been redacted with black marks, obscuring certain sections of text and possibly personal or sensitive information. The style of the document suggests it might be a transcript from an interview or court proceeding.

EFTA00008744-p-088.jpg

The image is a black and white copy of an official document with text covering its entirety. The background has been altered to be completely white, which makes the text stand out more prominently. The text includes questions and answers that appear to be related to some form of investigation or inquiry, with phrases like "She was driving" and "Her boyfriend's car," suggesting a personal interview about an incident involving someone else. Specific details have been redacted from the document using black lines across relevant parts of the text, obscuring sensitive information. The overall style is formal and informational, typical of legal or investigatory documents.

EFTA00008744-p-079.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with black text on white paper. It seems to be a record of some sort, possibly an official document like a receipt or a report. The text is too small and blurry to read in detail, but there are no visible people or locations that can be discerned. The document includes lines for data entry, which could suggest it's meant for recording personal information or transaction details.

EFTA00008744-p-070.jpg

The image shows a document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings. The document is printed and contains handwritten annotations. At the top, there's a section with "Q" marked as Question, followed by a line for an answer. There are several lines below this format, suggesting multiple questions and answers. One visible question reads, "What did you think when you learned about the new trial in September 1974?" The corresponding handwritten answer says, "I was afraid that I would be found guilty again." This indicates a personal account from someone who has previously faced legal consequences. The document is dated and signed at the bottom by an individual whose name and title are partially obscured. The visible part of the signature includes what seems to be "Court Reporter," suggesting that this person is responsible for taking down and transcribing statements during the proceedings.

EFTA00008744-p-065.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The paper appears to be a transcript of an interview or statement, as indicated by the numbered lines that correspond to questions (Q) and answers (A). There's visible text on the paper which seems to be obscured for privacy or security reasons. There are black marks covering parts of the document, presumably to conceal sensitive information such as names or personal details. The overall style of the image is straightforward and informational, with a focus on readability despite the redactions.

EFTA00008744-p-041.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes and questions on it. The majority of the content is obscured by black lines or marks, likely indicating sensitive information that has been redacted for privacy or security reasons. One visible question reads "What was the first time she told you about her troubled childhood?" This suggests that the document pertains to an interview or investigation where personal histories are being discussed. The style of the image is simple and utilitarian, without any artistic embellishments, focusing solely on the textual information it contains.

EFTA00008744-p-022.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten text and numbered lines. It appears to be a list with the title "Q & A" written at the top, indicating questions and answers are recorded here. The visible part of the first question reads, "What did you feel when you heard that she was pregnant?" The text is on lined paper, suggesting it might have been created by hand or typed onto a sheet meant for writing notes. The style of the document suggests an informal or personal context rather than a formal report or official document.

EFTA00008744-p-020.jpg

The image displays a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers on it. The text is partially obscured by the redacted sections indicated by black rectangles, suggesting sensitive information has been hidden for privacy purposes. The visible text includes phrases like "Did you know", "What do you think", and "How many times", which appear to be prompts for responses related to personal or private matters. However, due to the redaction, it's difficult to discern the full context of the questions or the nature of the answers provided in this document.

EFTA00008744-p-019.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document that appears to be a transcript or record of an interview with a person named "Norris" conducted by someone whose name is redacted (blacked out). The text on the document includes questions and answers related to personal information, such as Norris's age, location at specific dates, and other biographical details. The handwriting suggests that it might be from an older or informal source. The bottom of the document has a signature of the interviewer and their title, which is also redacted.

EFTA00008744-p-013.jpg

The image appears to be a photocopy of a document with handwritten notes and redacted information. The content seems to consist of paragraphs interspersed with questions followed by answers. There is visible text on the page that includes phrases such as "What I think," "someone has to come up," "investigation course of action," and various other statements which are not fully legible due to the redacted sections. The paper also contains personal information that has been deliberately obscured by lines through it, indicating sensitivity or confidentiality.

EFTA00008744-p-012.jpg

The image displays a page with handwritten notes that appear to be taken during an interview or conversation. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its sloppiness and the low resolution of the image. There are lines crossed out, which could indicate corrections or redactions in the text. The page includes numbered sections, suggesting it's part of a structured record-taking process. It seems to be a personal note rather than an official document, as there are no visible logos or stamps that would identify a specific institution or organization.

EFTA00008744-p-011.jpg

The image shows a page with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The handwriting appears to be personal and expressive, suggesting the document may be someone's journal entry or a written conversation. There is visible text in different areas of the page, some of which seems to include questions and answers, but parts are obscured by the handwriting. The overall style of the image is informal, and it gives an impression of being a personal piece of writing.

EFTA00008716-p-22.jpg

The image shows a computer screen with a web browser open displaying what appears to be a legal document or court order dated April 2, 2016. The document includes text and a line of redacted information, possibly to protect sensitive data such as names or addresses. At the bottom right corner of the screen, there is a mouse cursor visible, indicating that someone might be interacting with the document or browsing other content on the site. The image itself has a watermark diagonally across it, suggesting it's from a public record repository or similar service meant to obscure personal information for privacy reasons.

EFTA00008716-p-02.jpg

The image is a collage of three photographs featuring two individuals, likely a man and a woman based on their appearance. In the first photograph on the left, the man is seated in an airplane cabin; he appears to be smiling at the camera with his arm resting on the back of the seat in front of him. He's wearing a suit jacket and tie. The interior lighting suggests it might be nighttime or early morning due to the darkness outside. The second photograph shows both individuals standing close together, smiling at the camera. They seem to be dressed for an event with formal attire—the man is in a suit and tie, and the woman is wearing a dress. Their expressions are happy and they are posing closely to each other. In the third photograph on the right, the two people are again standing side by side but at an outdoor location during daylight. The man is dressed casually with a button-up shirt unbuttoned at the top and rolled up at the sleeves. The woman's attire isn't fully visible due to the angle of the photo, but she appears to be in casual clothing as well. There are no visible texts on the image that provide additional context or information about the location or identities of the individuals. The style of the image is a simple, personal collage without any artistic effects applied to it.

EFTA00008708-p-7.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten annotations and notes. The writing is small and somewhat difficult to read due to the quality of the image. There are lines drawn through some words, indicating corrections or deletions. At the bottom right corner, there's a signature which appears to be that of "Linda Barker." It seems like a personal or official letter that has been reviewed and annotated by someone named Linda.

PreviousPage 3 of 16Next