Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Pledge"

Found 4 documents with this tag

DOJ-OGR-00020979.jpg

The image displays a page with printed text. The content appears to be an official document with the heading "AGENDA" followed by a date and location which is not entirely clear due to the quality of the image. Below this heading, there are sections labeled "1. Call to Order" and "2. Pledge of Allegiance," suggesting that these are items on the agenda for discussion or action. The text is too small and blurry to read in detail; however, it seems to be related to a public meeting or event with an organized structure.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031096.txt

The document contains a series of emails between Jeffrey E. and G Maxwell regarding the Terramar project, with a focus on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Pinterest, Instagram, Pledge, and The Daily Catch. They discuss their relationship with each other and their involvement in the project. It appears that there are some unresolved questions and allegations being made, which they hope to address by writing a response.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030745.txt

This email exchange between Jeffrey E. and G Maxwell discusses the Terramar Project and its various social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Pinterest, Instagram, and Pledge. The conversation also touches on topics related to a lawyer-client relationship and allegations made by Clinton. The emails mention that Jeffrey hired masseurs, one of whom was employed by G Maxwell. It is suggested that a subpoena might be issued in response to the situation at hand.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt

The document discusses The Terramar Project, with key people such as G Maxwell and J Epstein being mentioned, along with social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. It also touches on topics like Pledge and the Daily Catch. Philip Barden writes about the necessity of issuing a cogent denial regarding allegations made against G Maxwell, emphasizing the importance of not remaining silent in order to maintain credibility and avoid potential legal consequences. The document highlights the need for a strong response to serious accusations to prevent them from becoming accepted as truth.