Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Priebus"

Found 8 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032916.txt

The document discusses the Trump administration's loyalty and advisors, mentioning that they have no loyal people with gravitas, but he is being advised to do as suggested by others. It also mentions a lack of loyalty in tossing Christie after four seconds flat, and questions who may be chosen for Treasury, suggesting that it could be someone bigger than Mnuchin to underscore/push forward the notion that Trump is Reagan 2.0. The conversation involves Landon Thomas Jr. as a financial reporter from the New York Times and Jeffrey E. as an email contact with jeevacation@gmail.com.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt

This document is a conversation between two people discussing the potential economic impact of Donald Trump's presidency, particularly in relation to his cabinet appointments and financial market reactions. One individual mentions that there might be more profit-making opportunities associated with Trump's policies than intelligence regarding them. The other person expresses interest in finding out who would fill the position of Treasury Secretary under a Reagan 2.0 scenario, as suggested by some people's opinions. The document indicates that Landon Thomas Jr. is a financial reporter for the New York Times and provides a link to more information about him on the newspaper's website.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032544.txt

In this email conversation between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E., they discuss a news article about an alleged tax evasion case involving Thomas Barrack Jr., a close friend of President Donald Trump. They also exchange information about their personal lives, such as where they live and work. The topic of a colonoscopy is briefly mentioned as well.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.txt

The document discusses the political strategy of Donald Trump and his decision-making regarding appointments to key positions in his administration. The focus is on people such as Christie who were considered but not appointed due to concerns about their competence and loyalty. The author suggests that appointing competent people beneath him who he trusts will help Trump appear more presidential and achieve his goals. The discussion also touches on the financial markets' reaction to Trump's election, with some investors seeing profits from the "Trump trade" and comparing him to Reagan.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt

This document is an email exchange between Thomas Jr., a financial reporter from The New York Times, and Jeffrey E. of JEE, discussing the potential choices for Treasury Secretary in President Trump's administration. Thomas Jr. suggests that a bigger name than Mnuchin may be chosen to underscore the notion that Trump is Reagan 2.0. The email also contains personal information about Thomas Jr., including his professional title and links to articles he has written. It warns against unauthorized use or disclosure of the communication's contents.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032369.txt

The document is an email from Landon Thomas Jr., a financial reporter at the New York Times, to Jeffrey Epstein, discussing potential picks for Treasury under President Trump. The email mentions the possibility of a bigger name being chosen and suggests that the "Trump trade" could be beneficial for certain hedge funds.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030656.txt

The document is a forwarded email from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein about a breaking news story regarding at least six of President Trump's advisers using private email accounts for government business. The key people mentioned in the email are Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus. The place mentioned in the email is New York, where Darren K. Indyke, PLLC is located.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt

The document is an email exchange between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E. The key people mentioned in the document are Steve Bannon, Sean Spicer, Reince Priebus, Jared Kushner, and Ivanka Trump. According to the document, nearly all of the non-family senior staff from the first six months of the Trump administration believe that he cannot function effectively in his role. It also suggests that some senior staff may be part of a Republican initiative to remove him from office.