Documents tagged "Rachel"
Found 8 documents with this tag
EFTA00008744-p-071.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The notes appear to be related to some form of testimony or questioning session, as there are multiple questions and responses written down in black ink. One of the visible questions is "A. Did you both see what happened on December 29th?" followed by the word "Yes" indicating an answer to that question. There's also a mention of a person named "Mr. Baird," suggesting that he is someone involved in or related to the context of these notes. The text "Rachel" and "Larry" are also visible, potentially referring to individuals mentioned during the session. The handwriting suggests that it was written by an individual who is likely male based on the script's style.
DOJ-OGR-00025685.jpg
The image displays a printed email on paper. The email appears to be from a person named "Rachel" and is addressed to "Raymond." It includes some redacted text, indicating that certain information has been intentionally obscured for privacy reasons. Additionally, there's visible text within the body of the email, but it's not clear enough to read all the details. The style of the image is straightforward and informational, typical of a physical copy of an electronic message intended for mailing or archival purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt
This is an email conversation between Jeffrey E. and Michael Wolff discussing several topics. They mention people such as Lorin Stein, Israel Horovitz, Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, Arthur Sulzberger, Woody Allen, and Donald Trump. The focus of their discussion seems to be on the current cultural climate with regards to sexual misconduct allegations and political issues related to President Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030771.txt
In the email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Michael Wolff, they discuss the current state of affairs involving various public figures, such as Lorin Stein, Israel Horovitz, Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, Arthur Sulzberger, Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, Glenn Simpson, Donald Trump, Ronan Farrow, and Steve Bannon. The conversation appears to be focused on the impact of recent events and allegations in media and politics, with Jeffrey E. expressing concerns about friends who may be involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt
The email exchange discusses key people and topics related to politics, including the former FBI director James Comey, deputy director Andrew McCabe, chief of staff James Rybicki, general counsel James Baker, Strzok, and Rachel Brand. The conversation also touches on corruption and giveaways. It's suggested that Lisa will call and that they follow Larry Summers on Twitter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030686.txt
This document is a conversation between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E about the downfall of famous people due to sexual harassment allegations. They mention Lorin Stein from Paris Review, Israel Horovitz, Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, Arthur Sulzberger, and Woody Allen as potential targets. The email also refers to Glenn Simpson's Fusion GPS and Donald Trump, but the rest of the content is truncated.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030684.txt
The document discusses a list of prominent individuals who are facing legal troubles or have been accused of misconduct. The conversation also touches on the idea that these events may not be isolated incidents and could potentially lead to further consequences for those involved. Additionally, the discussion includes references to an article about Glenn Simpson's Fusion GPS company and its connection to Donald Trump, as well as a mention of Woody Allen and his potential involvement in similar scandals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026755.txt
The document discusses the importance of science and its potential impact due to proposed budget cuts by President Trump. Neil deGrasse Tyson's quote about the difference between opinion and fact is mentioned, highlighting that while science is true regardless of belief, interpretation can introduce error. The National Cancer Institute, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and other scientific research institutions could face significant funding reductions if Trump's budget request is met.