Documents tagged "Transcript"
Found 141 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-09.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. It appears to be an interview transcript from the 1990s, as indicated by the date on the document. The title reads "Transcript of Interview" at the top. There are various questions listed with corresponding answers marked in black text. Some sections are circled or underlined, suggesting that they might be of particular importance or interest to someone reviewing the transcript. The style of the document is formal and informational, typical for legal or investigative records.
EFTA00008920-p-07.jpg
The image is a scanned document with visible handwriting and typed text on it. It appears to be an interview transcript or notes from a conversation between individuals whose names are redacted, as indicated by the placeholders "(Male)" and "(Female)." The content of the text includes questions such as "How long have you been here?" and "What is your relationship with (Redacted Name)?" The document has a number at the top right corner that reads "439," which may indicate its sequence or reference number within a larger set of documents. The page also includes additional text at the bottom that seems to be a standard footer with possibly the interview date and time, though this detail is not clearly legible in the image provided.
EFTA00008920-p-06.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or conversation. The handwriting style suggests it was written by hand. There are several questions listed with corresponding answers provided below each question. The text on the page includes visible letters and numbers, but due to the quality of the scan and the angle at which the image is taken, some words are not entirely legible. The document seems to be related to a formal interview or discussion with specific topics and responses.
EFTA00008920-p-03.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed text and some handwritten annotations. The document appears to be a page from an interview transcript or a record of questions and answers related to law enforcement inquiries or training, as suggested by the visible text that mentions "interview" and other topics that are typically associated with legal procedures or investigations. There are numbered lines where statements or answers were recorded, along with handwritten marks such as lines through some words or phrases, which could indicate corrections or deletions made during the review process. The document has a header with the name of an individual, followed by their title and an address that seems to be associated with a governmental agency or institution. The overall style of the image is straightforward, focusing on presenting textual information without any additional context or embellishments.
EFTA00008892-p-28.jpg
The image is of a printed document with text that appears to be an interview transcript. The text is partially obscured by black lines across sensitive information, likely names and other personal details. It includes phrases like "Q: What did you testify?" and "A: I never gave." There's also visible text that reads "I never saved" followed by a line that could be part of the name "Mrs. Kirstein" which is crossed out with black lines. The style of the image suggests it might have been scanned or photographed, as there are some shadows and uneven edges around the document, indicative of a physical copy rather than a digital original.
EFTA00008874-p-16.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed content that appears to be a legal document or court transcript. It contains typed text on both sides, including questions and answers, which might relate to an ongoing trial or deposition. The text is too small to read in detail, but it suggests the nature of the document is formal and possibly related to a legal proceeding. There are no images, people, or specific locations identifiable from this view of the document.
EFTA00008744-p-115.jpg
The image shows a sheet of paper with printed content that appears to be a transcript or notes from an interview or conversation. The paper is partially obscured by handwriting and marks, including lines drawn through some of the text and sections of words crossed out. There are visible lines where it seems like information was intentionally redacted or concealed. The document has numbered questions (e.g., "Q: I'm sorry I don't understand") followed by typed answers (e.g., "A: That's okay, I can clarify"). There are also handwritten annotations on the paper, such as arrows pointing to certain sections and underlines marking important information. The document is not dated or otherwise identified within the image itself.
EFTA00008744-p-114.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers listed in a structured format. The text on the document is too small to read clearly, but there are numbered items that suggest it's a list, possibly from an interview transcript or survey results. At the bottom, there's a smaller font text that seems to be related to a location or institution, but again, it's not legible due to the image resolution and size of the text. The document appears to be printed on regular paper with margins and lines typical for written records.
EFTA00008744-p-112.jpg
The image appears to be a handwritten page, possibly from an interview or a meeting transcript. It contains several lines of written text with question numbers and answers related to a conversation about an individual's work experience, particularly with regards to their knowledge of certain technical systems, as indicated by phrases like "flight control system" and "flight control computers." The handwriting is somewhat formal and legible, suggesting that the page was prepared in a professional setting. There are no visible images or other graphics on the page apart from the text itself.
EFTA00008744-p-106.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper containing several lines of text with questions and answers, formatted like an interview transcript. The font is dense and black against a white background. There are some redacted areas where parts of the text have been obscured with solid reds to maintain privacy or confidentiality. At the top, there is a date that appears to be "05/28/91" in a red rectangle bordered by a thin line. The document also contains what seems to be a page number "37" and a name "Amy," which suggests that this might be an interview with someone named Amy.
EFTA00008744-p-104.jpg
The image is a scanned document, possibly an official paper such as a court transcript or a report with questions and answers listed in black ink. The quality of the scan is not perfect, which makes some text harder to read. The visible parts of the text include phrases like "My dad was shot" and "And did he know what happened?" suggesting that the document pertains to an investigation or legal proceeding involving a family member's involvement in a violent incident. There are also question numbers such as "123456789" and answer indicators like "Yes," but the full context is obscured by the poor quality of the scan. The text on the document provides some insight into the subject matter, but the details are not entirely clear due to the image's resolution.
EFTA00008744-p-101.jpg
The image is a photograph of a piece of paper with typed information on it. The focus is blurred, but the text appears to contain numbered questions and corresponding answers related to an investigation or questioning session, possibly for legal or official purposes. There are also handwritten annotations on the paper, such as "Yes" written next to some of the questions, indicating responses. The top of the page has a phone number and what seems like an email address, but the text is cut off in the image. The style of the document suggests it might be from an official interview or deposition transcript.
EFTA00008744-p-098.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten text that appears to be an interview transcript or notes from a conversation. The text is black and seems to include questions and answers, but the actual content of the dialogue is not fully visible due to some words being crossed out with red ink. There are no people or locations depicted in this textual image, and all objects mentioned are related to the text itself. The handwriting style is cursive, suggesting that the document was created by someone who wanted to maintain a certain level of formality in their notes.
EFTA00008744-p-097.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers that appear to be from an interview. The questions are listed on the left side of the page under numbers such as "1," "2," etc., while the corresponding answers are on the right. Specific text in the image is not detailed due to the limitations of my capabilities. However, the document has been redacted with black marks, obscuring certain sections of text and possibly personal or sensitive information. The style of the document suggests it might be a transcript from an interview or court proceeding.
EFTA00008744-p-093.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The text is redacted, with black lines covering some portions, presumably to conceal sensitive information. The redactions are scattered across the page, obscuring specific details that might be otherwise visible. The visible parts suggest this could be an interview transcript or a report summarizing conversations, as evidenced by phrases like "Q: Did you speak with Smith?" and "A: Yes." However, the identities of individuals mentioned in the notes are hidden due to the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-092.jpg
The image appears to be a redacted document, possibly from a legal case or an official investigation, given the context of the text and the formal nature of the layout. The document is structured with numbered questions (Q) followed by answers (A) that correspond to them, suggesting an interview transcript or questionnaire responses. However, due to the redaction marks covering most of the visible content, it's not possible to provide specific details about people, locations, objects, or the actual context of the document. The purpose of this image seems to be for illustrative purposes related to redacted documents and their presentation.
EFTA00008744-p-090.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten text on it. It appears to be a legal transcription or notes from an investigation or court proceeding, as indicated by the context of the questions and answers. The document has several lines redacted with black marker strokes, concealing parts of the text. The visible portions include references to a person's statement about events, actions, and items associated with their case. The redaction suggests that some information is sensitive or confidential and is being kept from view.
EFTA00008744-p-087.jpg
The image shows a document with heavily redacted information. The top section includes what appears to be a date and possibly a location, but the details are obscured by black marks. Below this, there is a numbered list of questions or points, each followed by an answer or explanation that is also redacted. The text is primarily in a smaller font size, with the exception of the question numbers which are larger for clarity. The style of the image suggests it might be a formal document or transcript from an interview or legal proceeding.
EFTA00008744-p-082.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed questions and answers related to an investigation or legal inquiry. The top half of the page contains question numbers and corresponding blanks for responses, but the actual responses are not visible as they are obscured by redacted sections. At the bottom of the image, there is a partial question number "28" and the beginning of what appears to be a question followed by a handwritten note or response that reads, "Yes." The document has a formal layout typically used in official transcripts, reports, or legal records.
EFTA00008744-p-081.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or testimony, possibly from a court proceeding. The page has numbered lines with handwritten responses on it, and the content of the questions and answers is redacted (blacked out) for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This indicates the text contains sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. There are no visible texts, people, locations, or significant objects in this description due to the redaction of the information. The image itself is a photograph of a physical document rather than an artistic composition or a digitally created illustration.