Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "handwritten"

Found 743 documents with this tag

EFTA00008529-p-38.jpg

The image is of a printed document with visible handwritten annotations on it. The text appears to be blacked out for privacy or security reasons. On the bottom left corner, there's a signature in blue ink, suggesting that the document has been reviewed and approved by someone named "Johnny" as indicated by the name below the signature. In the top right corner, there is an illegible word written with a red pen, which could indicate a correction or emphasis on the text. The overall style of the image suggests it might be related to legal proceedings or official investigations given the formality of the document and the markings made upon it.

EFTA00008529-p-36.jpg

The image appears to be a blurred and rotated photocopy of a handwritten note or letter. The content is obscured due to the blurriness and rotation, making it difficult to read the text accurately. There's no clear indication of people, locations, or significant objects apart from the writing on the paper, which seems to be in English based on visible characters. Due to the image quality, I am unable to provide specific details about any objects within the note.

EFTA00008529-p-35.jpg

The image you've provided is of a low resolution and contains handwritten text which makes it difficult to read accurately. It appears to be a note or list with multiple lines of writing. There are several words and numbers that can be discerned, but due to the quality of the image, providing specific details about them would not be reliable. The background is nondescript, and there are no visible people, locations, or significant objects aside from the text itself. If you need a detailed description of the handwritten content, it might be helpful if you can provide a clearer image or transcribe the text.

EFTA00008529-p-32.jpg

The image is of a piece of paper with several lines of text, which appears to be part of an official document, possibly related to legal proceedings. The document includes question numbers (1 through 6) and corresponding answers, though specific details are not fully visible due to the resolution of the image. There are also some words or phrases that seem to have been redacted with black lines to obscure their content. The text is handwritten, suggesting it could be a transcript from an interview or hearing. The paper has a watermark-like background with diagonal stripes and what looks like a signature or stamp at the bottom right corner, indicating the document's authenticity or ownership.

EFTA00008529-p-31.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten text and annotations. The majority of the content is blacked out with red lines, obscuring the information that was originally written there. However, a few portions are visible: one line mentions "phone message" and another references "date on it," indicating discussions about records or messages possibly related to dates. There's also an illegible name near the top right corner of the document. The page is numbered in the upper left corner with "36" visible, suggesting that this is a continuation from previous pages not shown in the image.

EFTA00008529-p-30.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten content on it. There is a column of questions on the left and corresponding answers on the right side. The text appears to be related to an investigation or interview process, as indicated by phrases such as "Did anyone ask about her date of birth?" and similar inquiries that suggest personal or sensitive information being discussed. Each question has a written response underneath it. There are also numbers next to each question, which might indicate the sequence or importance of the questions in the context of the interview. The document is slightly blurred and appears to be a photocopy or scan, as evidenced by the quality of the handwriting and paper texture.

EFTA00008529-p-28.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes and lines that seem to indicate deletion of certain parts. The writing is partially obscured, but it looks like the document might have been used in an interview context, as there are questions with suggested answers crossed out. A name is mentioned at the top right corner, possibly indicating the subject or creator of this document. There is a date stamp on the bottom left, which includes numbers and letters that seem to be related to the year 2014. The overall condition of the paper indicates it has been handled quite often.

EFTA00008529-p-27.jpg

The image is a bit blurry and it's difficult to read the text clearly. However, from what I can discern, it appears to be a piece of paper with some handwritten notes or questions and answers. The style of the writing suggests an informal discussion or interview setting. There are numbers on the left side, which might indicate the order of questions or points discussed. The quality of the image is not high enough for me to provide more detailed information.

EFTA00008529-p-25.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten text, appearing to be notes from an interview or meeting. The text is somewhat obscured by the glare and quality of the paper, but it includes phrases like "Q: How did you feel when you first met?" which suggests that the questions are related to personal experiences or emotions. There's also a section where the word "spam" is underlined in red, indicating it might be something to highlight for further attention or discussion. The image quality makes it difficult to read the entire content and understand its context completely.

EFTA00008529-p-24.jpg

The image displays a document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or interrogation session. It features handwritten notes with questions on the left and answers on the right, indicating a question-and-answer format typical for such records. The visible text includes phrases like "What would you want to say about the situation?", "Answers I was looking for were that they were related," and "I didn't give them an answer because they asked me if it was possible." There is a phone number at the bottom of the document, suggesting contact information for the interviewer or the entity responsible for the transcript. The overall style of the image suggests a professional setting, likely legal or investigative in nature.

EFTA00008529-p-21.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten notes. The text is not fully legible due to the angle and distance from which the photo was taken. However, it seems to include lines such as "Q: Did you ever go there alone?" followed by an answer or response that is partially visible. There are also other question-answer pairs present on the paper. There's no person or specific location identifiable in this image due to the focus being on the text of the document rather than its surroundings. The significance of the object, which seems to be a legal note or some form of interview transcript, would depend on the context and clarity of the writing.

EFTA00008529-p-20.jpg

The image displays a page of handwritten notes with visible text and numbers throughout. The text appears to be part of an interview or questionnaire given the context of the questions and answers provided. Some words are redacted with black lines, obscuring their content. The numbering suggests there are multiple parts to the document, with this being the last numbered page indicated by "28" at the top right corner. There is no indication of a person or location within this portion of the image since the focus is on the written text.

EFTA00008529-p-19.jpg

The image shows a document with black text on white paper. The content of the document appears to be an interview summary or notes from an interview process. There are lines through some of the text, indicating that parts have been redacted or marked for deletion. The text is not fully visible due to the quality and angle of the photograph. On the left side of the image, there's a watermark or logo with the number "315" prominently displayed. Additionally, at the top right corner of the document, there are dates that seem to be handwritten notes: "1/10/19," followed by another set of numbers that are not entirely legible due to the resolution and angle of the photo. The document is slightly skewed, with the left side higher than the right, suggesting it was placed at an angle when photographed.

EFTA00008529-p-17.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text on it. The writing appears to be in blue ink and includes lines of text that seem to form paragraphs. There are also numbers written next to the text, possibly indicating questions or topics for discussion. The paper is placed against a darker background, which makes the text stand out more clearly. The style of the image suggests it could be a personal note, a list of tasks, or an outline for a conversation.

EFTA00008529-p-16.jpg

The image appears to be a digital photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten notes. The writing is done in black ink and includes numbered lines that likely correspond to questions or prompts for discussion. Some words are redacted with what looks like a black marker, obscuring their content from view. The text on the paper seems to be structured around a set of inquiries or topics, indicated by the numbering system (e.g. "Q24") followed by a question mark and a prompt that is partially visible. There are no people or specific locations identifiable within the image, as it focuses solely on the handwritten text.

EFTA00008529-p-15.jpg

The image displays a page of handwritten notes with several questions and answers. The text is organized into numbered points, suggesting an interview format. Some phrases are redacted with black lines across them to conceal sensitive information. There is no visible depiction of people or locations; the focus is entirely on the textual content which appears to be related to an investigation or a similar type of questioning process.

EFTA00008529-p-11.jpg

The image is a blurred document with writing on it. The text is partially obscured due to the blurriness and angle of the photograph. It appears to be a handwritten page with numbered questions and answers. However, the content of the text is not clear enough to read accurately. There are no distinguishable people or locations in the image, as it focuses on the document itself. The main objects in the image are the paper with writing and some indistinct shapes that could be part of a book or folder due to the angle of the photograph.

EFTA00008529-p-10.jpg

The image is a photograph of what appears to be an official document with handwritten notes on it. The document itself has numbered questions and answers that are related to a legal or investigative context. There are handwritten annotations throughout the text, including underlines, arrows pointing to specific parts of the document, and some words are highlighted in red ink. The style of the image is straightforward, capturing the details of the paper with clarity.

EFTA00008529-p-08.jpg

The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes. It's too small to read the details of the text clearly, but it appears to be a page from a case file or legal pad, possibly containing a list of questions and answers related to a court case or investigation. There are various numbers, words, and phrases written in different inks that suggest organization and categorization of information. The style of handwriting is informal and personal, suggesting this document was created by someone taking notes rather than being printed professionally.

EFTA00008529-p-07.jpg

The image appears to be a document with handwritten annotations. The top of the page is blacked out, and there are numbered lines with typed responses next to questions or statements that have been redacted. The visible text includes numbers such as "Q-24" and answers like "Yes" and "No." The style suggests this could be a form or questionnaire related to employment, legal proceedings, or perhaps an interview. However, the actual content is not fully disclosed due to redactions.

PreviousPage 20 of 38Next