Documents tagged "legal"
Found 296 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-50.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and printed text. The handwriting is on the left side of the page and appears to be in blue ink, providing answers to numbered questions or points raised in what seems to be a deposition or an interview setting. On the right side, there's printed text that includes a date "5/12/04" at the top right corner and is followed by additional information such as names and possibly roles or affiliations of individuals. The document has a formal appearance, suggesting it could be related to legal proceedings or an official investigation.
EFTA00008920-p-49.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes on it. The document is titled "Notes for Interview with Ms. K." and contains a list of questions or topics that are relevant to the interview. Some parts of the text have been redacted, meaning they've been intentionally obscured to hide sensitive information. It seems like this document was prepared in advance for an important discussion, possibly related to legal matters given the context suggested by the redactions and the formal structure of the notes.
EFTA00008920-p-48.jpg
The image shows a document with typed content on it. The document appears to be a report or transcript of an interview or conversation, as indicated by the presence of questions and answers listed in sections A through C. The text is too small to read clearly, but there are visible headings such as "A" followed by numbers 1 through 7, suggesting the questions were categorized or labeled accordingly. Additionally, there are sub-headings under "C" with more numbered points. At the top of the document, there's a date mentioned in the text: "5/2/96," which provides context for when this interview took place or was written up. The style of the image is that of an official paper record, possibly from a legal or medical case file.
EFTA00008920-p-44.jpg
The image shows a document with several lines of text, each beginning with "Q:" followed by a question and an answer labeled as "A:". The questions appear to be related to a legal or investigative context, and the answers seem to be providing information relevant to those questions. There's also a visible name at the bottom left corner of the document, which is possibly the interviewer or interviewee. A date is present on the right side, indicating when the document was created or the date of an event. The text within the "A:" answers are redacted with black lines to hide their content.
EFTA00008920-p-41.jpg
The image is of a document with a header that reads "COURT REPORTER" followed by the date "6/27/01" and a page number "113" in the top right corner. It appears to be a transcript from a court proceeding, as indicated by the numbered questions (Q) and answers (A). The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to contain statements made by individuals during the course of legal proceedings. There's also a mention of a person named "MARTIN" in one of the responses. The overall style of the image suggests an official court document with typed content and handwritten notes or corrections on some lines.
EFTA00008920-p-37.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and lines of writing. The style of the handwriting suggests that it is a manual transcription or notetaking from an interview or testimony, possibly related to court proceedings. The text includes questions like "Did you make any attempts to locate your husband" and "Did you ever discuss a divorce." Names such as "Susie" are mentioned, indicating individuals involved in the discussion or case. There are also phrases like "informant's father" and "her husband's car parked next to her house," which provide context about relationships and locations. The document appears to be an official record with headers and footers typically used in legal or investigative documentation.
EFTA00008920-p-29.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document, possibly an interview transcript or statement record, with several lines of handwritten text. The document appears to be from an official proceeding due to the structured layout, numbering of questions, and the use of abbreviations such as "Q" for question and "A" for answer. There are some sections where text has been redacted with black lines covering it, indicating sensitive information is being concealed. The visible parts of the text include a reference to a specific date and time, which suggests that this document may be part of a court case or legal investigation. Additionally, there's a section titled "Docket Number" and other headings like "Question" followed by "Answer," implying an interview format. There are no visible images or people in the image; it is entirely text-based on a white background.
EFTA00008920-p-28.jpg
The image is a scanned document with a series of questions and answers related to a legal case. The text on the paper has been redacted, covering up sensitive information and keeping it confidential. The layout suggests that this could be part of a deposition or an interview transcript where each question is followed by its corresponding answer, but the content is not visible in this image due to the redaction.
EFTA00008920-p-27.jpg
The image displays a typed document with handwritten annotations and corrections on the right side. The document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by the heading "INTERVIEW OF WITNESS" followed by a date and the name of an individual, which is redacted. Below this title, there are sections labeled A through D, each containing numbered questions with corresponding answers. Section A starts with question 16 asking about the witness's knowledge of someone named "Peterson" who reportedly has access to a building on East 3rd Street. The handwritten annotations next to this question and others in section A highlight specific points or clarify certain responses. The document seems to be a record of an interview conducted as part of legal investigation, possibly related to a real estate case given the references to properties and individuals associated with them.
EFTA00008920-p-26.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with multiple paragraphs of text. The text appears to be a transcript or a report related to an interview or testimony given by a person named "Herman Brown" at the "U.S. Court House" on "1/5/78" at 9:40 AM. Several parts of the text are redacted with black lines, obscuring information that is not meant to be visible. The overall style of the image suggests it is a formal document from a legal or official proceeding.
EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.
EFTA00008920-p-24.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten content. It appears to be a page from a legal case summary or notes taken during an interview or court proceeding. The page contains multiple numbered points with handwritten text that seems to be related to witness statements or questions asked. Some of the text includes phrases like "wasn't there", "in my car", "had no idea", and "never heard back". There are several lines struck out using a heavy pencil mark, indicating deletions or corrections made during this note-taking process. The document has a formal look, with header sections at the top that include dates and other information possibly related to the case's context.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-21.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be an official document or transcription from a legal or medical context, judging by the presence of numbers and a title at the top that resembles a question number "23". The visible text includes phrases like "How did they get in contact?", suggesting a line of questioning or statements related to some investigation or interview. There are also handwritten notes on the document, indicating editing or annotations, with words such as "paid for" and "character" circled with lines through them, possibly to strike out these points. The paper is set against a plain background that does not provide any additional context or distraction from the text.
EFTA00008920-p-20.jpg
The image displays a document with typed content, which appears to be an interview transcript. The document has redacted information with black lines covering parts of the text. At the top, there is a heading that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a formal investigation. The text includes questions and answers, but specific details are obscured by the redaction marks. Below the redacted content, there's a signature followed by initials, which indicates the document was likely signed by an individual, potentially the interviewer or a party involved in the legal process.
EFTA00008920-p-19.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed responses to questions. The questions appear to be about a specific individual's experiences during a period of time, potentially related to their living conditions, education, and personal history. Due to the quality of the scan and the angle of the photograph, it's challenging to read all the text clearly. However, some visible phrases include "Did you go through school?" and "What happened when you were 17?" The document seems to be a part of an interview or investigative record, possibly for legal or social service purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.
EFTA00008920-p-17.jpg
The image displays a page of written notes with an overlaid redacted stamp at the top left corner, obscuring certain details such as names and dates. The text appears to be related to a legal case or investigation, with questions and answers structured in columns labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers. There are references to individuals involved, possibly witnesses or suspects, but their identities are not revealed due to the redaction. The page has been photocopied multiple times as indicated by the faded quality of the text and the visible copies behind it.
EFTA00008920-p-15.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed responses to questions on the subject of an individual's financial donations. The questions are posed as if for cross-examination in legal proceedings. There is a section titled "Q: Did he donate $10,000 to Lott?" followed by a response that reads, "Yes." Other questions inquire about donations and their context, such as the donation of an airplane to an organization. The document appears to be from the year 2004, as indicated in the upper right corner.
EFTA00008920-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers typed out on lined paper. The top part is partially obscured, but one can see that it contains a date and the word "question" followed by the number "1." Below this, there are two visible questions: "What was your profession?" and "Where were you born?" The corresponding answers seem to be blanked out with red lines or stamps, making them unreadable. There is a name at the bottom of the document that appears to read "JOHN DOE" in capital letters. This is typically a placeholder for an individual's actual name when discussing legal matters or anonymity. The image also includes what seems to be a logo or emblem to the right, but it is not clear enough to discern any specific details. Overall, the document appears to be part of an interview or investigation, possibly related to law enforcement or court proceedings, given the style and content visible in the image.