Documents tagged "public"
Found 97 documents with this tag
EFTA00020517-p-2.jpg
The image is a scanned document with numerous redacted sections, which means parts of the text have been deliberately obscured for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks are typically used to conceal sensitive information like names, addresses, and personal details from public view. As the content of the redacted areas has been intentionally hidden, it's not possible to provide specifics about the visible text or any people, locations, or significant objects within those sections. The document appears to be official in nature, possibly a legal or governmental record, given the formality and structure of the layout.
EFTA00009116-p-101.jpg
The image is a faded photocopy of handwritten notes arranged on lined paper. The notes are structured into numbered points and questions with answers provided. The content appears to be related to public relations or media responses, as evidenced by phrases like "how the incident was handled" and "public perception." Due to the quality of the image, some text is difficult to read, but it seems that the writer has addressed several concerns and prepared responses for them. There are no people, locations, or significant objects other than the paper with handwritten notes.
EFTA00009116-p-085.jpg
The image displays a black and white page with text, which appears to be an article from a publication due to the presence of a title at the top that reads "Page 26". There is also visible text in a column on the left side of the page, but it is not fully legible or clear enough to provide a detailed description. The quality and resolution of the image suggest that it might be a scanned document, possibly from an older issue of a magazine or newspaper given the style of the text and layout. There are no people, specific locations, or significant objects that can be confidently identified from this partial view.
EFTA00009116-p-062.jpg
The image shows a black and white document that appears to be an interview schedule or script for a news segment or discussion panel. At the top of the page, there are redacted names where the person's name is replaced with "MR" or "MRS," followed by what seems to be their last name, indicating male or female speakers. The text contains topics and questions for each speaker, including issues related to public opinion on political matters, potential for compromise in discussion, and personal reactions. There are numbers next to the names, which might refer to the order of appearance or some other categorization. The document also has redacted phone numbers, indicating a need for confidentiality around these details.
EFTA00009116-p-044.jpg
The image appears to be a black and white photocopy or scan of a document with handwritten notes. The text is partially obscured by the watermark "IM_START" repeated across it. The writing includes phrases such as "if you can't have," "you don't really need," and other incomplete sentences that are difficult to read due to the quality of the image and the handwriting style. There are also lines drawn through some text, suggesting corrections or deletions. This document seems to be a personal note or journal entry, rather than a formal letter or publication.
EFTA00009116-p-012.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with text that is heavily redacted. The redactions are made using black lines across the text, making it difficult to read the original content. Only a few words and phrases can be discerned without any context. There are no visible people or specific locations in this particular image due to the heavy redaction of text. The document has page numbers at the top right corner, suggesting that it's part of a larger series or publication.
EFTA00009116-p-001.jpg
The image displays a page with printed text, which appears to be an official document or report due to its formal layout and use of numbered sections. The top right corner has the page number "30" indicating that this is one of many pages in the document. The title "Appendix" suggests that this section contains additional information related to the main body of the report. Section 5 of the appendix lists four questions with their corresponding answers, all of which have been redacted or obscured by black marks, making them unreadable for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This is a common practice in official documents where sensitive information must be hidden from public view. At the bottom of the page, there is a footnote labeled "32" with an associated letter "A". However, the content of this footnote is also redacted and not visible. The overall style of the image suggests it is a digital photograph or scan of a physical document, possibly intended for legal or historical archival purposes.
EFTA00009016-p-076.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes, possibly from an interview or meeting. The paper is yellowed and has black ink writing on it. The top of the document includes a section labeled "Q&A" and numbered items like 1-30, suggesting questions asked to a subject or topics covered in discussion. There are also sections titled "Suggestions" and "Points for Further Discussion." The text is too small to read clearly, but it appears to be a list of statements or prompts with responses or notes next to them. The overall style suggests a personal or informal setting rather than a professional publication.
EFTA00009016-p-054.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes and corrections. The paper appears to be lined, and the writing includes numbers at the top left, suggesting these might be questions or points on a list. Some words are corrected in red ink, indicating revisions made after the initial writing. The text seems to be related to some form of discussion or analysis, possibly political given the reference to "republicans" on one line. The quality and texture of the paper suggest it is an older document or was written with a pen that bled onto the paper.
EFTA00008998-p-16.jpg
The image displays a document with printed text on it, which appears to be a news article related to court proceedings involving the State of New York. The document is black and white, and there are two columns of text visible in the captured portion. The style of the text suggests an official or formal publication, possibly from a legal or governmental source. There's no image of people, locations, or significant objects other than the printed document itself.
EFTA00008998-p-05.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document that contains several paragraphs of text related to legal proceedings. The first paragraph discusses the admissibility of evidence about the truthfulness of an individual and whether it's relevant to their credibility in court. The second paragraph mentions specific years (1976, 1980) and the names "MARGARET," "RANDALL," and "SUSAN" without providing further context. Below the text is a photo of an urban scene that includes trees lining the street and a building with classical architectural features. The photo is taken during daylight hours, as indicated by the natural lighting. There are no people visible in the photograph, focusing instead on the architecture and environment of what appears to be a public area or courtyard.
EFTA00008874-p-06.jpg
The image is a photograph of a paper with two photographs on it, placed side by side within the frame of the larger photo. The paper's background appears to be an office setting due to the presence of blinds and what seems to be a window in the upper left corner. The top photograph captures a tropical landscape, likely taken during the daytime given the bright lighting conditions. It shows palm trees against a clear sky, with a building that might be a part of a resort or hotel complex visible in the distance. There are no people clearly visible in this photo. Below it, there's another photograph depicting a more urban scene, possibly taken at night given the artificial lighting and darker surroundings. This image features what looks like a multi-story building with a well-lit facade that has arched windows or entrances. The architecture suggests it could be a public or historical building, possibly located in an area with Spanish influences, as indicated by the text "An Arch in Santa Fe New Mexico" which is partially visible and likely refers to the location of this structure. The style of the image appears to be educational or informative, possibly used for teaching purposes, such as geography or architecture classes.
EFTA00008744-p-081.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or testimony, possibly from a court proceeding. The page has numbered lines with handwritten responses on it, and the content of the questions and answers is redacted (blacked out) for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This indicates the text contains sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. There are no visible texts, people, locations, or significant objects in this description due to the redaction of the information. The image itself is a photograph of a physical document rather than an artistic composition or a digitally created illustration.
EFTA00008716-p-22.jpg
The image shows a computer screen with a web browser open displaying what appears to be a legal document or court order dated April 2, 2016. The document includes text and a line of redacted information, possibly to protect sensitive data such as names or addresses. At the bottom right corner of the screen, there is a mouse cursor visible, indicating that someone might be interacting with the document or browsing other content on the site. The image itself has a watermark diagonally across it, suggesting it's from a public record repository or similar service meant to obscure personal information for privacy reasons.
EFTA00008631-p-51.jpg
The image appears to be a piece of paper with a handwritten list that includes numbers and answers to questions. The content seems to be related to an investigation or a set of inquiries, possibly from a witness statement or interview notes. There is a mention of a name "Sarah Wilson" which suggests the information may pertain to her. However, due to the resolution and the style of the handwriting, it's challenging to read all the details with certainty. The paper also contains some blacked-out areas, indicating that certain parts have been redacted or are not intended for public view.
EFTA00008631-p-34.jpg
The image displays a document with a series of questions and answers, possibly from an interview transcript or a questionnaire. Some questions are redacted or obscured by being blacked out. The visible question at the top reads: "What do you think is important to know about someone who was born in New York City?" There is text indicating that this document is related to the FBI and is not for public dissemination, suggesting it might be a sensitive law enforcement document. The image quality suggests it may have been taken from an actual piece of paper with visible creases and folds, adding to its authenticity as a physical document rather than a digital one.
EFTA00008631-p-28.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with black and white text. The text is partially redacted, meaning certain parts of the words are obscured by being marked out, typically done to maintain privacy in sensitive documents. It seems like a formal or official document, possibly related to court proceedings given the structure of questions and answers typical of an interview or deposition. The redaction marks suggest that this is not a publicly accessible document but rather one intended for specific individuals involved in the case.
EFTA00005586-p-105.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of a news story or an article from a publication with the headline "Grand Jury NY". The content is obscured by black squares or stripes, making it impossible to read any text or discern any details about people, locations, or objects within the frame. The style suggests that this might be an attempt at censoring sensitive information, such as protecting the identity of individuals named in a court proceeding.
EFTA00005586-p-091.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of an article from "Grand Jury NY" with the headline blurred out. The body of the text is also obscured, making it difficult to discern specific details about the content of the story. The design and layout suggest that this could be part of an online publication or a digital version of a printed newspaper.
EFTA00005586-p-088.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of a smartphone displaying what seems like an official document from the "Grand Jury NY" with the word "CONFIDENTIAL" at the top. The body of the document is mostly blacked out, suggesting that the information within it is sensitive and not meant for public view. There are vertical lines indicating redaction or encryption to obscure the content of the document. The text is small and the font is a standard typeface typically used in official documents.