Documents tagged "record"
Found 183 documents with this tag
EFTA00008631-p-68.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper that appears to be a record of an interview or statement with multiple questions and answers. The text on the page is partially obscured by black markings, covering sections of the document. The visible text includes phrases such as "the situation," "she was angry," "what you want," and other incomplete sentences. There are also numbers at the top right corner of the paper, which might indicate a page number or a reference code for the document. The style of the image is straightforward and functional, typical of official documents or transcripts used in professional or legal contexts. The focus is on delivering information clearly, although in this case parts of that information are redacted with black marks. There are no people depicted in the image; it consists solely of text on a white background.
EFTA00008631-p-66.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper with typed text that appears to be an official document, possibly a transcript or record from a court proceeding. The content is related to questions and answers, likely from a witness testimony. A question asks for the location of a specific incident, to which the answer indicates it took place in a bar. There are black marks covering parts of the text, obscuring certain information. At the top right corner, there's a timestamp or date with "10:59" and possibly some numbers that could be page numbers or code references. The overall style of the image is utilitarian and informative, typical of legal documentation.
EFTA00008631-p-63.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper with printed text, which appears to be a transcript of an interview or a recorded conversation. The layout is structured with numbered questions and corresponding answers, though some parts are redacted by black boxes covering the text. There are no visible people in the image; the focus is solely on the textual content. Due to the resolution, it's challenging to discern specific words or details about the context of the interview.
EFTA00008631-p-61.jpg
The image is of a paper with typed text on it, which appears to be a transcript of a conversation or interview. There are several lines with questions and answers written in black ink, indicating that the content is likely related to an event that was recorded or transcribed. The quality of the photo is not very clear, but there's visible text and some redactions where parts of the words have been obscured with a line through them, typically done for privacy or legal reasons.
EFTA00008631-p-55.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with text that has been redacted or blacked out for privacy purposes. The visible portions of the text suggest that it could be an official document, possibly related to law enforcement or legal proceedings. There are numbered lines and questions on the left side, indicating a structured format, such as an interview record or testimony outline. However, without additional context or clearer text, specific details about the content or purpose of the document remain unknown.
EFTA00008631-p-52.jpg
The image shows a document with typed text that appears to be a transcript or record of an interview or conversation. The person conducting the interview is identified as "Jeff" and there's a series of questions listed with corresponding answers from another individual whose name is redacted with an asterisk symbol. The text includes statements such as, "A: I don’t know what you’re talking about," indicating that the subject denies or expresses ignorance about certain points raised in the interview. At the top left corner, there's a date "4/27/98" and it seems like this document is related to some legal or investigative matter given the structure of the questions and answers. The image itself has a faded quality, suggesting it might be an old document or photocopy.
EFTA00008631-p-47.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten text on it, which appears to be a record of an interview or a series of questions and answers related to some sort of investigation or case review. There are multiple lines with numbers indicating the order of the entries (e.g., "12"), followed by question numbers (e.g., "Q: 50") and handwritten responses that have been redacted with black lines, obscuring the content for privacy or legal reasons. The text is somewhat smudged in places, making some words difficult to read, but overall it's clear that the document contains sensitive information intended for official use.
EFTA00008631-p-35.jpg
The image shows a document with multiple questions and answers that appear to be related to an investigation of some sort. The top of the page is obscured by black ink, making it difficult to discern any text in that area. There are several numbered questions visible on the left side, ranging from "2" at the top to "38" at the bottom, each followed by a handwritten answer. The style of the document suggests an informal or possibly secretarial record, and the language is English. The document appears to be a photocopy due to the quality and texture visible on the surface.
EFTA00008631-p-25.jpg
The image is a scanned document with some redacted information. It appears to be a record of an interview or testimony, possibly legal in nature, as indicated by the structure and language used. The content includes questions and answers formatted in columns. Some text has been redacted with black lines to obscure sensitive information. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects other than the printed document itself.
EFTA00008631-p-20.jpg
The image displays a document that appears to be a court transcript with portions redacted for privacy or security reasons. The text is typed and organized into numbered sections, indicating different questions or topics addressed in the proceedings. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects other than the text itself. Due to the redaction of certain information, it's not possible to provide details about the content of the conversation recorded in the transcript.
EFTA00008631-p-19.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text on it. The handwriting is somewhat small and difficult to read due to the quality of the image. It appears to be a transcript of an interview or a written record of a conversation, as indicated by the presence of questions, responses, and possibly other notes related to the content of the discussion. There are also numbers like "21" at various points on the paper, which could indicate the section number or perhaps a page number in a larger document. The specific details of what is being discussed or who it involves cannot be confidently determined from this image alone.
EFTA00008631-p-13.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document that appears to be the transcript of an interview or conversation. The text on the document is partially obscured and redacted for privacy reasons, with some words blacked out. There are numbered lines indicating separate statements or questions. The visible parts of the text suggest that this might have been a recorded exchange, possibly relating to a legal or investigative context, given the structured format. At the bottom right corner, there is a signature, which may belong to either the interviewee, witness, or interviewer. However, due to redaction, no specific names are visible.
EFTA00008631-p-10.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with handwritten responses on it. The text is black and written with ink that has faded slightly over time, indicating the document might be older or has been exposed to light. There are lines crossed out in red, which suggests corrections or deletions made by the person who filled out the form. At the top of the page, there's a date and an illegible signature followed by "AUTHORIZED AGENT" printed in bold letters. The document seems to be a formal record with numbered questions on the left side and corresponding responses written down the right side. It looks like an interview or survey form due to the structured format of question and answer.
EFTA00008631-p-06.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten text and markings. It appears to be a legal document or court record, given the context provided by the visible questions and answers. The text includes references to photographs, individuals' statements, and other elements typically found in legal proceedings. There are multiple sections with question numbers and corresponding answers, suggesting an interrogation or testimony transcript. The handwriting is somewhat messy and difficult to decipher entirely, indicating that it might have been rushed or written in a hurried manner.
EFTA00008631-p-05.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes and marks made by a person. The document appears to be an official court record or transcript, indicated by the header that includes the word "COURT" in capital letters. There are lines through certain sections of text, suggesting it has been redacted or deemed confidential. Handwritten annotations include underlines, circled words, and margin notes, likely indicating areas of interest or concern for the person reviewing the document. The focus is on the content of the document rather than its aesthetic qualities.
EFTA00008631-p-04.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The top of the page is partially obscured by black marks, likely intended to conceal certain information. There are numbered lines indicating questions, some of which have been crossed out or altered with handwriting. One visible question reads "Did you just decide to help?" followed by an answer that seems to be a combination of typed and handwritten text, but it's not fully legible due to the quality of the image. The document appears to be an interview transcript or some form of legal record based on the context provided.
EFTA00008631-p-02.jpg
The image is a blurry photograph of what appears to be an official document, possibly a court record or transcript due to the presence of a header with redacted information and questions listed under sections labeled "Q" for questioner and "A" for answerer. The text within these sections is too small and blurred to read clearly. The quality of the image does not allow for detailed descriptions of specific texts or objects, but it conveys the sense of an official legal document that has been partially obscured by redaction.
EFTA00008599-p-27.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a faded appearance, making it slightly difficult to read the details clearly. The top part of the document includes what seems like a title or header followed by some information that is partially obscured and redacted. There are various fields with entries such as names, dates, locations, and account numbers which have been blacked out for privacy. The visible text includes words like "NAME," "ADDRESS," "AMOUNT," and other similar terms related to financial or administrative records. Due to the image quality, the exact content of the document is not fully legible.
EFTA00008585-p-14.jpg
The image appears to be a copy of a document with redacted areas, likely a certificate of authenticity for some form of recorded material. At the top left corner, there's a small watermark or logo that reads "COURT OF APPEALS NEW YORK CITY," indicating the jurisdiction this document is associated with. The body of text includes phrases such as "CERTIFICATE," and the date "DECEMBER 6, 2005." There are handwritten annotations in black ink, including the words "TRUE COPY," which suggests that the person making the copy has verified its authenticity. The bottom left corner contains a redacted section, and there is a partially visible name that reads "DAVID EISENMANN."
EFTA00008585-p-10.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes with questions and answers, possibly from an interview or investigation. It is marked "Page 12" at the top right corner, indicating that this is part of a larger document. The text is written in black ink on lined paper, and various sections are covered by lines to indicate they've been redacted or removed for privacy or legal reasons. The visible text includes questions like "Did you discuss phone records with any member?" and answers such as "Yes, I would not have known to ask for them if it was not discussed." There is also a question about someone who worked at a location in New York, with the answer stating that they did not know them or recall receiving messages from there. The overall style of the image suggests it might be related to legal proceedings, given the formality and structure of the written questions and answers.