Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "yes"

Found 214 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027133.txt

The document appears to be a chat log from an iMessage conversation between two individuals, one of whom mentions they are meeting with Jared Kushner and would like some advice on whether or not to discuss the topic of the surgeon general. The other participant suggests asking about Tom Barrack instead. There is also mention of House Oversight and Vernon Jordan, Josh Bolton, and Me. The conversation takes place over a span of approximately 7 hours from 01/27/17 at 07:51:01 AM (507225061) to 01/27/17 at 08:22:52 PM (507270172).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027128.txt

This document captures a conversation between two individuals regarding dinner plans on the sender's birthday. They discuss their shared admiration for James Watson, the discoverer of DNA, and his controversial views. The participants also share personal stories about their children, with one person acknowledging that they have more in common than they realized.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026508.txt

The document discusses the topic of ranked choice voting and its impact on voter turnout and political representation. It mentions an article from Cato Unbound that argues that ranked choice voting may lead to lower turnout and more errors, but does not have a significant effect on ethnicity. The writer expresses skepticism about this claim and suggests that ranked choice voting could increase the diversity of candidates by allowing for the election of centrists who are closer to the median voter's preferences. However, the document also mentions an argument that ranked choice voting increases turnout, but only if voters are given the option to rank as many or as few candidates as they like. The writer concludes that this topic is a "big nothingburger" and not worth discussing in depth.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt

The document is a series of emails discussing the topic of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) and its potential effects on political outcomes. One person mentions that there are empirical studies showing RCV increases turnout, while another notes that extremists may run under RCV but centrists could defeat them. Another person discusses how RCV could have impacted the 2016 US presidential election, suggesting that Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent without risking a Trump victory if RCV had been used.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026237.txt

In the document, Jeffrey and another person are discussing their travel plans for New Year's. They mention going to Dubai with family and waiting for a trip to New York. The other person is also interested in updates about a Saudi project they had discussed earlier. Jeffrey mentions bringing a special cake from New York, but his interlocutor declines the offer, preferring a more private celebration at Jeffrey's house.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026123.txt

The email chain discusses a situation where someone has accused another person of betraying them 15 years ago. The accuser claims that there was a lawsuit in which they asked the other person to get involved and help, but they refused. The person being accused denies this accusation and asks for more information or insight into the matter.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt

The document is a series of emails between two individuals named Jeffrey E. and Nicholas Ribis. The topic of the conversation revolves around Donald Trump's claim that Jeffrey betrayed him 15 years ago by refusing to help with a lawsuit. Nick seems to be trying to find out more information about this situation, while Jeffrey is initially hesitant to discuss it further. Ultimately, the correspondence suggests that the two individuals have differing opinions on the matter and may not see eye-to-eye on certain aspects of their relationship or interactions with Donald Trump.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026106.txt

Nicholas Ribis and Jeffrey E. are having a conversation via email regarding meeting times and locations, with some discussion about phone numbers as well. The tone of the conversation is informal and friendly. They appear to be discussing plans for a shared project or event.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026100.txt

The document consists of a series of email exchanges between two individuals. The key people mentioned are Nicholas Ribis and Jeffrey E. They discuss various topics such as the timing of phone calls, sharing inside information, and potential legal implications. It is important to note that the communication contains sensitive information intended for the recipient only, and any unauthorized use or disclosure is strictly prohibited.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026098.txt

The document appears to be a series of emails between Nicholas Ribi and Jeffrey E. The content of the emails is confidential and contains information that may be attorney-client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the addressee and unauthorized use, disclosure, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. There is mention of a bad time and an invitation to call at 8 or early tomorrow.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026096.txt

This document is a series of emails between Nicholas Ribis and Jeffrey E. The emails discuss scheduling phone calls and making references to Jarred and DJT. The content appears to be confidential and may be attorney-client privileged, inside information, or intended only for the addressee. It also includes instructions on how to handle receiving these communications in error.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026094.txt

Nicholas Ribis and Jeffrey E. exchange messages about a time to talk. Nicholas mentions Jared and DJT in one of his messages, which may be related to the topic at hand. The message from Jeffrey E. contains confidential information that is intended only for the recipient and may be attorney-client privileged or contain inside information. It also warns against unauthorized use, disclosure, or copying of the communication.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt

The document is an email conversation between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. regarding the topic of giving up an apartment in New York due to high rent costs. The key people involved are Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., who provide advice and discuss their feelings on the matter. They mention that they will consider calling Eric for a data point before making a decision.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025814.txt

In this exchange of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., Kathy expresses her hesitation about giving up her apartment in New York. Jeffrey suggests that she wait until Sunday to make a decision. The conversation also touches on topics such as the Jewish faith, politics, and public transportation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025734.txt

The document is a transcript of an iMessage conversation between two individuals named Jee and another person whose identity is not revealed. The conversation takes place over several days from August 25 to September 3, 2018. The topic of the conversation appears to be related to political issues, specifically the situation in the White House under President Trump. The people involved express their opinions about the president's actions and character, with Jee suggesting that he is a smart individual but also has serious flaws. The other participant agrees with this assessment but believes that it's important for others to recognize the crisis at hand. The message IDs of some messages are mentioned in the document, such as 19748 and 556889478.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025707.txt

The document is a chat transcript from an iMessage conversation between "jee" and another participant whose name is not visible in the source entry. The conversation spans from August 17 to August 23, 2018. The participants discuss topics such as scheduling and work-related events. The message "How did it go?" was sent by jee at 08/17/18 09:07:05 AM (556214825), and the last message visible in the source entry is from jee at 08/17/18 03:14:32 PM (556236879).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025479.txt

This document contains a series of messages from an iMessage chat room between two participants: jee and another person with the email address e:jeeitunes@gmail.com. The conversation discusses material they received, scheduling for a potential trip to the island, a possible deal with Darren, and other topics. Key pieces of information include names like Dan and Darren, as well as references to schedules and an article from Unherd.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025429.txt

The document appears to be a chat log from an iMessage conversation that took place between two individuals on February 27th, 2019. The chat includes various messages discussing topics such as grades, college transcripts, outfits, and the House Oversight Committee (HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025429). There are also some non-sequitur messages that do not seem to relate to a coherent conversation. The participants' names, presentity IDs, and message timestamps are visible in the chat log.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025426.txt

The source document is an iMessage conversation between two participants, jee and another individual whose identity is not revealed in the conversation. The conversation covers a range of topics including planning for an interview, discussion about editing and staging, the juxtaposition of political events, and personal feelings related to the situation. There are also references to specific people like Johnnie and Woody. The overall tone of the conversation seems professional and focused on achieving high-quality results for their project.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025368.txt

This document appears to be a transcript of an iMessage conversation between two individuals named Jee and a participant whose identity is unknown from the document. The messages cover various topics such as movie reviews, travel plans, and political events involving the New Yorker Festival. The conversation took place over several days, with the last message sent on September 7, 2018. The source entry for this transcript includes information about its creation, such as the date it was created and where it can be found on a Macintosh HD system.

PreviousPage 10 of 11Next